- Summary & Methdology
- Industry Trends
- Transition Manager League Tables
- Global
- USA
- Canada
-
Europe/
UK/MENA -
Asia/
Pacific - Transition Manager Profiles
- Abel Noser
- BlackRock
- BTIG
- Citi
- Fidelity Investments
- Maquarie
- Northern Trust
- Pavilion
- State Street
Past Surveys
Transition Manager League Tables
Number of Regions Qualified and Responses
(Asia/Pacific Providers)
Qualified providers | Number of responses |
Citi | 12 |
Macquarie | 12 |
State Street | 13 |
All Respondents | 41 |
Percentage of “Extremely Satisfied” Clients
(Asia/Pacific Providers)
Rank | “Extremely Satisfied” | |
1 | Citi | 83.3% |
2 | Macquarie | 72.7% |
3 | State Street | 58.3% |
All Respondents | 72.0% |
Transition Complexity (Asia/Pacific Providers)
(5 = “extremely complex”; 1 = “very simple”)
Rank | Transition complexity | |
1 | Citi | 3.58 |
2 | Macquarie | 3.45 |
2 | State Street | 3.23 |
All Respondents | 3.52 |
Disclosure of Performance vs Benchmarks
(Asia/Pacific Providers)
5 = “complete disclosure”; 1 = “no disclosure”
Rank | Disclosure of performance vs benchmarks | |
1 | State Street | 4.67 |
2 | Macquarie | 4.64 |
3 | Citi | 4.42 |
All Respondents | 4.60 |
Assessment of Performance vs Pre-trade Estimate
(Asia/Pacific Providers)
5 = “always below”; 1 = “always above”
Rank | Performance vs. central point estimate | |
1 | Citi | 3.80 |
2 | Macquarie | 3.55 |
3 | State Street | 3.50 |
All Respondents | 3.53 |
Overall Satisfaction (Asia/Pacific Providers)
5 = “extremely satisfied”; 1 = “not at all satisfied”
Rank | Overall satisfaction | |
1 | Citi | 4.83 |
2 | Macquarie | 4.73 |
3 | State Street | 4.42 |
All Respondents | 4.67 |