- Introduction & Methodology
- Survey
- Vendor Ratings
- BlackRock
- Goldman Sachs
- J.P. Morgan Asset Management
- Morgan Stanley
- Russell
- Buyer's Guide
Past Surveys
Vendor Ratings
Morgan Stanley
Client Satisfaction
VERY SATISFIED |
SOMEWHAT SATISFIED |
NOT VERY SATISFIED |
NOT AT ALL SATISFIED |
|
Overall service | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
Investment results | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Value for fees | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
Ancillary services | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
Top 3 Reasons Why Morgan Stanley Was Selected
1. | Reputation/ track record | 80% |
2. | Management experience | 60% |
3. | Breadth of services | 60% |
Investment Outsourcing AUM
ASSETS | CLIENTS | |
Recommends~ | $490M | 5 |
Full discretion | $18.2B | 251 |
~ Recommends manager selection or replacement subject to prior client approval. |
OCIO AUM by Client Type
Corporate pensions | $422M |
Public/government pensions | $0 |
Endowments/foundations | $4.8B |
Educational institutions/health care | $1.8B |
Other | $11.2B |
OCIO AUM by Fund Type
Defined benefit pensions | $9.8B |
401(k), 403(b), or other DC plans | $106M |
Endowments/foundations | $4.9B |
Health care pools* | $600M |
Other | $2.8B |
*Board designated, funded depreciation. |
OCIO AUM by Investment Vehicle
Separate Accounts | $10.9B |
Pooled vehicles (proprietary to clients)** | $7.3B |
Pooled vehicles (outsourcer selected)*** | $0 |
Other | $0 |
**Managed by outside managers; ***Securities are selected by OCIO. |
Revenue by Fee Structure
Flat fees | 10% |
Sliding asset-based | 90% |
Performance-based | 0% |
Other | 0% |
OCIO Executive(s)
Suzanne Lindquist |
Lisa Shalett |