- Introduction & Methodology
- Survey
- Vendor Ratings
- BlackRock
- Goldman Sachs
- J.P. Morgan Asset Management
- Morgan Stanley
- Russell
- Buyer's Guide
Past Surveys
Vendor Ratings
Goldman Sachs
Client Satisfaction
VERY SATISFIED |
SOMEWHAT SATISFIED |
NOT VERY SATISFIED |
NOT AT ALL SATISFIED |
|
Overall service | 69% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
Investment results | 62% | 31% | 0% | 7% |
Value for fees | 54% | 38% | 0% | 8% |
Ancillary services | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
Top 3 Reasons Why Goldman Sachs Was Selected
1. | Reputation/track record | 75% |
2. | Management experience | 67% |
3. | Client service | 50% |
Investment Outsourcing AUM
ASSETS | CLIENTS | |
Recommends~ | $40.9B | 23 |
Full discretion | $60B | 227 |
~ Recommends manager selection or replacement subject to prior client approval. |
OCIO AUM by Client Type
Corporate pensions | $26.3B |
Public/government pensions | $4.1B |
Endowments/foundations | $6.7B |
Educational institutions/health care | $2B |
Other | $21.4B |
OCIO AUM by Fund Type
Defined benefit pensions | $30.4B |
401(k), 403(b), or other DC plans | $175M |
Endowments/foundations | $8.2B |
Health care pools* | $451M |
Other | $21B |
*Board designated, funded depreciation. |
OCIO AUM by Investment Vehicle
Separate Accounts | n/a |
Pooled vehicles (proprietary to clients)** | n/a |
Pooled vehicles (outsourcer selected)*** | n/a |
Other | n/a |
**Managed by outside managers; ***Securities are selected by OCIO. |
Revenue by Fee Structure
Flat fees | 0% |
Sliding asset-based | 100% |
Performance-based | 0% |
Other | 0% |
OCIO Executive(s)
Kane Brenan |