WPP De-Risks £140 Million in DB Liabilities

The pension insurance buy-ins cover communication giant’s five pension plans.

UK-based communications company WPP has de-risked £140 million ($193.4 million) of defined benefit liabilities carried by its five pension plans with the Pension Insurance Corporation (PIC), a specialist insurer of defined benefit pension funds. The pension insurance buy-ins cover pensioner and deferred liabilities.

“This was a complicated transaction,” said Peter Docking of Independent Trustee Limited, the Trustee Chair for each of the five pension plans, in a release, adding that the move helps the company “achieve our aim of securing the benefits of pension scheme members.”

PIC said the “innovative transaction” simultaneously secures the pension payments of the five pension funds sponsored by WPP, continuing a trend of FTSE100 companies that have de-risked their pensions through insurance.

“The bulk annuity market is currently undergoing a period of intense demand,” said Mitul Magudia, PIC’s head of business development, “and we expect more such high-profile transactions in 2018, in what many believe will be an exceptionally busy year.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

PIC said that midway through 2017, the company had insured 145,400 pension fund members, and had £24.2 billion in financial investments accumulated through pension insurance buyouts and buy-ins to UK defined benefit pensions.

A report released last month by London-based consulting firm Lane Clark & Peacock forecast a run-up in pension de-risking actions in 2018, due to the improving funding levels of some of the UK’s largest pension funds. The number of FTSE 100 pension plans estimated to exceed an 80% funded level has nearly doubled over the past two years. The report also found that 20% of the pension funds among the FTSE 100 companies were more than 80% funded in 2017, up from 13% in 2016, and 11% in 2015.

“As a result of this improved affordability,” said the report, “we predict a marked increase in demand from pension plans to de-risk in 2018, but also an increase in insurer capacity to cater for higher volumes.”

Tags: , , , ,

ISBI Chair Explains Why Illinois Ditched Hedge Funds

State investment board cut nearly all of its hedge fund managers.

Marc Levine, chairman of the Illinois State Board of Investment (ISBI), didn’t mince words on why he decided to remove hedge funds from the board’s investment portfolio: they were confusing and underperforming, with unjustified high fees. Levine started the culling process two years ago, when he became chairman of the $22 billion entity.

“I had been reviewing the Board’s portfolio and noticed a lot of holdings labeled hedge funds. They were run by something called a “hedge fund manager,” whatever that was. Most bought and sold stocks—but so did other funds we owned that showed up under the category “stocks” and were run by “equity fund managers,”” he wrote in a column for The Wall Street Journal.

“I had been appointed in 2015 and we were taking a fresh look at the portfolio. We decided to reduce the allocation to hedge funds from 10% to 3%,” Levine told CIO, adding that the Board’s decision was unanimous. “We met with our hedge fund of fund managers during a two-day investment committee meeting.”

Although the hedge funds also bet on equities, as well as commodities, derivatives, and other vessels, they were underperforming, with fees feeling unjustified. In addition, their returns were only benchmarked against other hedge funds in the HFRI. After the ISBI applied the proper market benchmarks to that of the hedges, heads began to roll for the asset class, as the board proceeded to cut nearly all of the hedge fund managers. Some were moved to the equities side of the portfolio, newly christened as “equities managers,” but Levine, who favored the ISBI’s bonds and a long-only strategy, had made his interests clear. It was time to stick to passive in order to preserve the fund for future generations.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“Some of our equity guys were pretty good,” he said. “In maybe July or so of last year, we decided to just zero out the hedge fund category completely and then the guys who picked stocks, we just moved them along into our equity book, which is where they belong. The guys we retained have massive alpha. They all have at least 300 basis points, sometimes 1,000 over a long period of time, and they’ve kept those numbers up.”

As for where the remainder of the hedge fund portfolio went, the ISBI moved the money to its fixed income portfolio, mostly as bonds, which Levine still feels is underweighted. “We didn’t have any opportunistic credit, and now that category is 8% for us,” he said. “It’s basically unleveraged. We love that asset class.”

Levine says the board, which oversees the pensions of five pension plans (the State Employees’ Retirement System, the General Assembly Retirement System, the Judges’ Retirement System of Illinois, the Illinois Power Agency, and the State of Illinois Deferred Compensation Plan), has saved $75 million per year in money manager fees.  In the last fiscal year, ISBI saw 12.3% returns.

Illinois is currently undergoing a pension crisis, with a pension deficit of $129 billion. When asked of a recent concept of a titanic bond sale being introduced to state legislators, Levine suggested that rather than have a professor explain the idea, lawmakers need to speak with capital markets professionals. Although Levine admits that there are some silver linings in all of this, it’s more of an issue of reform and restructuring than just a simple bond buy.

“Who is going to buy these bonds?” he asked.

“I’ve spent my life in the financial markets [and] I cannot imagine that there are investors out there who are going to take all of the risk off of the taxpayers and pension beneficiaries and take it on themselves,” he said. “Having said that, I think it’s a worthwhile issue to look at—not in the context of $109 billion—but it’s certainly preferable…if some of that [state credit risk] could be shifted over to bond holders who are willingly doing it, that’s a good thing, but the only way that’s going to happen in my view is some kind of pension reform or restructuring.”

As for reform plans, Levine opined on his own behalf that it’s going to have to come to a Federal level for things to be on their way to restructure.

“The state supreme court voted 7-0 almost three years ago that took pension fiscal management out of the hands of the legislature, which is problematic. The only way I know of to get it back in the hands of the legislature is for the Federal government to pass a Puerto Rico-style restructuring type bill,” he said. “You really need your lawmakers to deal with these fiscal problems and where we’re sitting, ever since that decision, they can’t. Somehow that’s got to be fixed. You really need a federal bill to enable the state to utilize US bankruptcy laws to restructure its liabilities.”

“I’m not talking about a bailout, of course. That’s not going to happen,” he said.

Tags: , , ,

«