With Stellar Investments, Texas Endowment Hands Out Robust Bonuses to Managers

After investments beat benchmarks for three straight years, Texas’s public university endowment has shelled out $7.2 million in bonuses to 29 managers.

(November 10, 2011) — Texas’s public university endowment has awarded $7.2 million in bonuses to 29 managers, with the biggest award of $1.88 million going to University of Texas Investment Management Co.’s (UTIMCO) chief executive, Bloomberg has reported.  

The bonuses come as managers at the second-largest US college fund beat benchmarks for three straight years, the fund’s top executive told Bloomberg. President Cathy Iberg received approximately $1.08 million, according to the news service, while the smallest payout was $25,000. In comparison, the fund paid $5.1 million in 2010 bonuses.

In July, the University of Texas revealed that its five endowment funds were up 20% in the year ended June 30, and up approximately 17% for the fiscal year to date.

“I’m not surprised the Texas fund would pay $7 million total, and around $2 million to the head,” Jeff Visithpanich, principal at Johnson Associates, told aiCIO. “It’s a highly objective industry, where performance is significantly linked to pay…Given 20% returns, $2 million incentives does not appear off the charts,” he said.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The news follows a May 2010 report by compensation consulting boutique Johnson Associates, which noted that money management compensation should increase by up to 20% during the year. The pace of economic recovery, industry activity, business mix, and evolving legislation are key bonus drivers for 2010, the report said.

“There’s been so much scrutiny with compensation and the big question is what execs are going to do at the end of 2010,” Visithpanich told aiCIO last year. “Last year, top management at financial firms took big cuts in incentive pay, but since then, companies including Goldman Sachs have implied ‘business as usual,’ likely meaning a return to massive bonuses and other incentives.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

JP Morgan Survey: Despite Obstacles, European Institutions Remain Committed to Fixed-Income

A new survey by JP Morgan Asset Management shows that despite concerns of low interest rates, political risk, and portfolio risk among European institutional investors, fixed-income allocations will not be reduced. 

(November 10, 2011) — European institutions are faced with concerns over interest rates, political risk, and portfolio risk in their fixed-income portfolios, according to a new survey by JP Morgan Asset Management.

However, these concerns will not cause institutional investors to reduce their fixed-income allocation, the firm found. 

Ravi Rastogi, a London-based director at Towers Watson Investments, supports the commitment to fixed-income among European institutional investors. “Many investors hold fixed-income allocations for risk mitigation reasons. In today’s environment, that need to have fixed-income hasn’t changed,” he told aiCIO, adding that the commitment to bonds is also being reshaped by the growing realization of the false definition of ‘risk-free.’ Sovereign bonds, once considered risk-free, clearly have risk, driving investors to apply diversification principles across the fixed-income universe, he asserted.  

Furthermore, Rastogi noted that the bond universe is sufficiently larger than European investors have initially accessed. “In line with many institutional investors worldwide, many investors in Europe have typically had home-biased fixed-income portfolios, but with changing regulations such as Solvency II, institutional investors are realizing that they are less tied to domestic investments, expanding globally.” 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

According to JP Morgan’s survey, respondents noted that their main objective for allocating to fixed-income was stable returns, with 22% of those surveyed noting that they are concerned about the current low-rate environment. Meanwhile, 19% of respondents said sovereign/political risk is a worry. In addition, 19% said they are worried about managing portfolio risk and 13% are concerned about inflation/rising rates. However, despite their concerns, 73% said they would maintain or increase allocations by the end of 2011.

Nick Gartside, International CIO of Fixed Income at JP Morgan Asset Management said: “2011 has seen the almost unthinkable prospect of sovereign default arising in European markets including Greece, Ireland, Italy and Portugal. Meanwhile, concerns over the US economy and its level of borrowing have seen Standard & Poor’s downgrade US sovereign debt from triple-A for the first time in the country’s history. Against this backdrop, it is clear that fixed income investors are being taken into uncharted territory, which makes this report all the more timely.”

Additionally, the survey found that on average, European institutions allocate 56% of their overall portfolio to fixed income (twice their allocation to equity). More specifically, life companies hold the highest fixed income allocation (74%), while public pension funds hold 42% on average.

In a statement, Gartside continued: “The concerns raised by investors indicate they are facing a unique confluence of factors – low interest rates, inflationary pressures, sovereign default risk – that present challenges across all parts of the yield curve and appear to leave few ‘safe haven’ fixed income assets to move to. Faced with high market uncertainty, but also stringent liability and regulatory obligations, many institutions may decide that the best course of action is to sit tight. But it is also important to acknowledge that the Eurozone crisis has also created new opportunities for fixed income investors. Compared to five years ago, there is much greater differentiation between the credit risks posed by different sovereign issuers in the Eurozone.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«