With Goldman Lawsuit, Populism Reaches Pension Funds

Financial giant Goldman Sachs has been sued by a $5.8 billion union pension plan over its alleged use of TARP and FDIC-backed funds to pay executive bonuses.

(December 17, 2009) – A union pension plan has sued financial giant Goldman Sachs over its 2009 bonus pool.


The lawsuit, brought by law firm Grant & Eisenhofer at the behest of the Michigan-based Security Police and Fire Professionals of America Retirement Fund (a $5.8 billion fund), alleges that the record bonus payments set to be distributed to Goldman Sachs—estimated at $22 billion—are the result not of executive performance, but of fund received in the government’s support of the financial industry. By paying such bonuses, the suit claims, the firm is breaching its fiduciary duty to its shareholders. According to a press release, Goldman Sachs’s bonuses were the result of “a trillion-dollar investment made by the American taxpayers that was meant to stabilize the financial industry, [and]…not based on the hard work of the executives.” The lawsuit has been brought in the New York State Supreme Court.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.


Not surprisingly, Goldman Sachs has rejected the premise of the lawsuit: “We think the suit it entirely without merit,” said firm spokesperson Lucas van Pragg, according to Bloomberg News.


Goldman Sachs received $10 billion from the federal government in the fall of 2008 through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (known as TARP); it also, through a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation program that guaranteed debt, was able to accumulate $29 billion in cash. However, the firm returned the $10 billion in June of this year.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

Dubai, Again, Gets Bailout from Abu Dhabi

 

Not for the first time in 2009, Abu Dhabi—the federal seat of government for the United Arab Emirates—has been forced to step in and provide an injection of funds for a debt-ridden Dubai.

 

(December 17, 2009) – Abu Dhabi once again has come to the rescue of its neighbor Dubai with a $10 billion bailout aimed at easing pressure on the poorer Emirate’s debt load.

 


Earlier this year, Abu Dhabi—the federal seat of the United Arab Emirates and the owner of the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund (SWF), the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority—agreed to purchase upward of $10 billion in Dubai-backed bonds following hints that Dubai’s sovereign wealth vehicles were having issues repaying debt. (To see ai5000’s June article on the problems at Dubai’s various investment vehicles, click here .) However, the debt issuance seemingly did little to stop Dubai’s hemorrhaging: In late November, the state admitted that it needs to restructure $26 billion in debt.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

 


In response, Abu Dhabi has had to step in again, this time offering up a direct injection of $10 billion. Among other things, the injection will be used to repay a $3.5 billion Islamic bond issued by Nakheel, the state’s real estate development arm, according to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

 


Experts expect that the cash infusion will allow Abu Dhabi to retain more control over Dubai’s assets, and also will do little to change the basic issue of leverage in the diminutive Emirate. “Moving away from the debt repayment uncertainty, we focus investors’ attention back to fundamental economic and systemic challenges which have not changed materially,” Saud Masud, head of research at UBS in Dubai, told the WSJ. Furthermore, some are suggesting the Dubai Holdings—the private investment vehicle of the Emirate’s Sheikh, as opposed to Dubai World, which is ostensibly for the public—could be facing similar but unstated debt issues, having upward of $2 billion in debt due in 2010.




To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

«