Wilshire Trust Universe Reports Best Quarter Since 2009

Quarterly return of 8.26% provides strong rebound from 2018’s dismal Q4.

Institutional plan assets tracked by the Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service earned median returns of 4.21% for the year ending March 31, and 8.26% for the first quarter, which was the largest quarterly gain since the third quarter of 2009.

The Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index, which measures the performance of US equities, rose 14.11% during the first quarter and 8.93% for the year, while the MSCI AC World ex U.S., which tracks international equities, rose 10.31% for the quarter but was down 4.22% for the year. US bonds, represented by the Wilshire Bond Index, increased 5.17% during the first quarter, and 4.03% for the year.

“Nearly all asset classes delivered healthy returns for institutional investors during the first quarter,” Jason Schwarz, president, Wilshire Analytics and Wilshire Funds Management, said in a release.  “Government bonds were buoyed by expectations of lower interest rates extending for a longer period of time. This was also supportive of riskier assets such as high yield bonds and equities, which rallied substantially higher off low valuations at the end of 2018.”

Large plans, defined by Wilshire as those with assets of more than $1 billion, posted median gains of 7.34% for the quarter, and 4.60% for the year. Meanwhile small plans—those with assets of less than $1 billion—outperformed large plans for the quarter, returning 8.69%, but underperformed for the year ending March 31 with a 4.06% return. However all plan types underperformed a 60% stock, 40% fixed income portfolio, which gained 10.08% during the quarter.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Median ranges across plan types for the quarter range from gains of 6.32% to 8.93% for Taft Hartley Health and Welfare Fund and multiemployer defined benefit plans, respectively. One-year medians ranged from gains of 3.87% to 4.70% for foundations and endowments, and for corporate funds with assets of more than $1 billion.

The performance was a big turnaround from the previous quarter when Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service assets lost 7.05% during the fourth quarter of 2018—its worst performance since the third quarter of 2011—and lost 4.05% for the year ending Dec. 31, 2018.

Related Stories:

Public Pension Plans Funding Grows in 2018, Assumed Return Rates Dip

Q4 Market Swings Trim Corporate Pension Plans’ Funding in 2018

Tags: , ,

European Commission Fines Banks €1 Billion for Currency Rigging

Barclays, RBS, Citigroup, JP Morgan, and MUFG allegedly participated in forex cartels.

The European Commission (EC) has fined Barclays, The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Citigroup, JP Morgan, and MUFG Bank €1.07 billion ($1.19 billion) for participating in foreign exchange spot trading cartels.  

The fines involved two settlement decisions in which the five banks allegedly took part in two cartels in the spot foreign exchange market for 11 currencies.

The first decision imposes a total fine of nearly €811.2 million against Barclays, RBS, Citigroup, and JPMorgan. The second decision imposes a total fine of approximately €257.7 million on Barclays, RBS, and MUFG Bank.

UBS is an addressee of both decisions, but was not fined because the company revealed the existence of the cartels to the European Commission.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“Foreign exchange spot trading activities are one of the largest markets in the world, worth billions of euros every day,” Margrethe Vestager, European Commissioner in charge of competition policy, said in a release. “These cartel decisions send a clear message that the Commission will not tolerate collusive behavior in any sector of the financial markets.”

The EC said its investigation revealed that some individual traders in charge of forex spot trading of the currencies on behalf of the relevant banks exchanged sensitive information and trading plans, and occasionally coordinated their trading strategies through professional chat rooms.

The EC said the information exchanged in these chat rooms was commercially sensitive, and related to outstanding customers’ orders, such as the amount that a client wanted to exchange and the specific currencies involved, as well as indications on which client was involved in a transaction. The information also pertained to bid-ask spreads applicable to specific transactions, as well as the currency they needed to sell or buy in order to convert their portfolios into their bank’s currency.

“The information exchanges, following the tacit understanding reached by the participating traders, enabled them to make informed market decisions on whether to sell or buy the currencies they had in their portfolios and when,” said the EC.

The EC said that the information exchanges also allowed the traders to identify opportunities for coordination, such as through a practice called “standing down,” in which some traders would temporarily refrain from trading activity to avoid interfering with another trader in the chat room.

The EC said most of the traders participating in the chat rooms knew each other personally—for example, one chatroom was called Essex Express ‘n the Jimmy because all the traders except one named James lived in Essex and met on a train to London. Some of the traders created the chatrooms and then invited one another to join.

The traders, who were direct competitors, allegedly typically logged in to multilateral chatrooms on Bloomberg terminals for the whole working day, and had extensive conversations about a variety of subjects, including recurring updates on their trading activities.

“The behavior of these banks undermined the integrity of the sector at the expense of the European economy and consumers,” said Vestager.

Related Stories:

European Commission Says More Needs to Be Done to Ensure Adequate Pensions

Pension Sues Banks over Euro Bond Scandal

Tags: , , , , ,

«