Will High Inflation Do a Number on Stocks? You Bet, Says Goldman

Its 50-year study documents just how an escalating CPI is no friend to the market.


So, inflation is coming in hot, relatively speaking. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for May showed a remarkable jump of 5% annually, the largest increase since August 2008, in the heady days right before the financial crisis. It was just 1.2% in 2020 and 1.8% in 2019. The first big question now is: Will this peppery inflation rate persist and run even hotter?

For investors, the second big question is: What will higher inflation mean for stocks? The answer, according to Goldman Sachs, is that if inflation stays muted, stocks will do well. If the CPI takes off, though, they won’t, or at least their returns will be mediocre.

“The stock market tends to perform better during periods of low inflation than when inflation is high,” Goldman’s chief US equity strategist, David Kostin, told clients. While that sounds like conventional wisdom, the Goldman study documents how this works.

Everything depends on the sustainability of the current inflationary surge, for sure. At the moment, standard expectations are that the recent jump was due to temporary factors, such as pent-up demand, supply constraints, and federal stimulus outlays. The Philadelphia Federal Reserve, in its latest survey of forecasters, shows an average annual 2.3% CPI rise over the next 10 years.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The market seems to be siding with this benign conclusion. The five-year breakeven rate, the difference between Treasurys and Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS), has inflation at 2.4% yearly between now and 2026. Meanwhile, investors are piling into the benchmark 10-year Treasury, whose yield dipped to 1.46% on Friday, down from 1.56% the week before and from the 2021 peak of 1.72% in March. If investors’ inflation expectations were for a major up-trend, a yield decrease wouldn’t be happening.

Since the end of double-digit inflation in the early 1980s, the pattern has been for full-year CPI to stay in the low single digits, around 2%. Whenever it came in at a high point, which was never much more than 5%, it quickly fell back.

The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation indicator, the core personal consumption expenditures index, or PCE, moved up 3.1% annually in April (the next reading, for May, is due in a couple of weeks). That was above the 2.9% consensus estimate.

Since 1962, Goldman’s study found, when inflation was high, stocks had a median market return of 9% annually, and when it was low, stocks gained 15%. The firm defined “high” and “low” by the CPI’s movement in comparison to forecasters’ projections.

More granularly, Goldman indicated, stocks rose a so-so 4% when inflation was low and rising—that’s the case now—and a gratifying 19% when the CPI was low and falling. Further, equities nudged up just 2% annually when inflation was high and rising, versus 15% when the CPI was high and falling.

Certainly, the performance varies by sector. Health care, energy, real estate, and consumer staples do best with mounting inflation. But tech and materials shares do the worst.

And there’s another way of culling out the best performers when inflation is high, the Goldman study stated. Stocks with large and stable gross margins fare the best. Gross margin is what’s left over after production costs are subtracted from sales revenue. Those with high margins, therefore, have pricing power. Goldman’s roster of these companies includes Adobe, Aspen Technology, Activision Blizzard, Etsy, and Williams Companies.

Related Stories:

Is Higher Inflation Coming? Yeah, a Whopping 20%, Says Jeremy Siegel

Here’s Why Inflation Isn’t a Threat: Money Velocity

Morgan Stanley: Buy Inflation-Sensitive Stocks

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

PSERS Trustees Yank Their Request to Oust Executive Director, CIO

Board members at the beleaguered pension fund withdrew their call for a vote of termination at Friday’s meeting.


A call for the removal of the executive director and chief investment officer at the troubled Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) was pulled by board members, a fund spokeswoman said. 

On Thursday, a group of six out of 15 trustees had asked the board chairman to hold a vote of no confidence and termination at Friday’s board meeting, against Executive Director Glen R. Grell and CIO James H. Grossman Jr. The trustees sought the hiring of an interim executive director, as well as hiring Verus Investments as a temporary outsourced CIO. 

But then the board members who called for the ousters removed their demand, according to a fund spokeswoman. “The chair complied with that request, and therefore no vote occurred,” she said. 

Since March, the pension plan leaders have been embroiled in a financial reporting scandal that is the subject of both an internal and federal investigation. A mistake in the fund’s recent annual investment return would have passed the cost of the pension fund contributions to the state’s taxpayers. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Now, a recertification of the member contribution rate will mean thousands of teachers will have to pay more in employee contributions this year. 

The pension fund said an outside consultant has admitted to the error, though leaders have not named the consultant. 

Last week, a lawsuit was also filed against PSERS, seeking access to financial records at the pension fund. The complaint was filed by a board member, state Senator Katie Muth, with the support of two other board members, who say the withholding of documents is “outrageous.” 

In response, the pension fund has said that it has developed a methodology to ensure that “each board member has complete access to all of the information necessary for the execution of his or her fiduciary duties.” 

The six trustees also cited a decade of underperformance at the pension fund, resulting in higher payroll deductions for about 100,000 school employees, as contributing to the need for a management change. 

Related Stories: 

FBI Said to Seek Evidence of Kickbacks, Bribery at Pennsylvania PSERS

Pennsylvania PSERS Hires Law Firms to Probe Reporting Error

PBGC to Shoulder Defunct Law Firm’s Pensions

Tags: , , , , ,

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.