Why Fed Rate Hikes May Be Over

Mission accomplished: Tightening probably won’t continue at the central bank’s meeting next week, says economist Ian Shepherdson.


The U.S. had a blow-out jobs gain in May, adding 339,000, with the previous two months revised upward. That’s evidence that the Federal Reserve will keep on pumping up rates to slow the economy and bring down inflation, right?

Likely not, according to Ian Shepherdson, founder and chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. In his latest report, the noted economist argued that the big payroll increases are the last vestiges of employers’ frantic push to fill vacancies. Those job-count expansions, he wrote, stand a good chance of getting revised downward.

In Pantheon’s view, loss of momentum on restaurants, airlines and hotels revenues show that economic growth is “flattening.” What’s more, wage growth is decelerating. Average hourly earnings went up at a 3.8% annualized rate in the three months ending in May, versus the comparable year-before period’s 4.9%.

Fed policymakers have raised their benchmark rate 10 times between March 2022 and last month, totaling 5 percentage points. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other top Fed officials have hinted they might skip a rate increase at their next policy meeting, scheduled for June 13 and 14. If so, the question is: What happens after that?

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The futures market believes the Fed will stand pat at next week’s conclave and will either maintain the current level (a band of 5.0% to 5.25%) or reduce it by a quarter percentage point by December. The Consumer Price Index, the most publicly watched inflation metric, will be announced for May on the first day of the coming Fed meeting. As of April, the CPI had fallen to 4.9% from its 21st-century high of 9.1%, set in June 2022.

The Pantheon report, which Shepherdson co-authored with Kieran Clancy, the firm’s senior U.S. economist, argued that, using “historical experience,” the Fed has “done enough” to slow the economy and diminish inflation. It commented: “The tightening since March last year is the fastest since the Volcker Fed in 1980-to-81 and ought to be more than sufficient to drive up the unemployment rate.”

Fed actions often take a while to show results, the report noted. “As a rule of thumb, rates totaling more than about 300bp across a year usually are enough to kill economic growth,” the report declared.On this reading, the Fed should not hike again, and should just wait for the impact of its prior actions to work through.”

The Pantheon report stated the possibility that the Fed will enact another rate increase up ahead, but “we expect no further hikes.”

Related Stories:

When the Fed Stops Hiking, What Happens to the Stock Market?

U.S. Asset Managers Fear Federal Reserve Rate Hikes Will Cause Recession

‘No Landing’ Economy? Can’t Happen, Says LPL Savant

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Why AI Craze Is Eerily Reminiscent of Dot-Com Era

Nobody yet knows how to monetize artificial intelligence, BCA Research warns.



If a tech company has anything to do with artificial intelligence these days, it is golden. The biggest example: Stock in Nvidia Corp., which makes chips used in AI, has tripled in price this year, briefly topping $1 trillion in market value this past week and sporting a lofty price/earnings multiple of 208.

 

This craze has surfaced several skeptics who think AI is overhyped. Chief among them is BCA Research, which issued a report comparing the AI enthusiasm to the late-1990s dot-com boom, which did not end well for investors.

 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Just as with the excitement over internet companies back then, investors are overlooking the fact that AI’s utilization is unclear, the research note said, so betting now is premature: “The economy-wide productivity gains from the rollout of the internet accrued before most firms figured out how to monetize it. The same could happen with AI.”

 

True, Nvidia is profitable, which could not be said about most of the 1990s dot-com bunch, a ragtag crowd of startups fueled by venture capital. But BCA’s note pointed out that the AI beneficiaries are largely big companies such as Microsoft. That will not last, BCA predicted, saying these few will get competition, which will complicate their ability to dominate the AI field.

 

“Although they are loath to admit it, most of the profits that today’s internet companies earn stem from the quasi-monopoly power that they enjoy,” BCA observed. “It is possible that AI will have the opposite effect, leading to more competition, not less.”

 

What’s more, the AI frenzy ultimately could produce problems for bond investors, BCA reasoned: “The surge in IT spending during the late 1990s extended the business cycle and pushed up bond yields. However, once the boom turned into a bust, yields fell more than they would have otherwise. AI could have a similar effect on yields—higher in the short run, lower in the long run.” 

 

Still, on the plus side, stock fads in one category have a way of touching off rallies elsewhere, BCA counseled. It noted that after the dot-coms bombed, commodities took off, particularly oil. One reason was that investors, stung by internet losses, wanted to find another place to put their money. Oil was a good prospect at the time because China was expanding.

 

“The AI revolution could similarly drive up commodity prices, with metals being the biggest beneficiaries,” BCA’s note stated.

 

Certainly, beyond computer chips, AI does not need much in the way of raw materials. But it likely will make other areas of finance more efficient, BCA declared. For instance, McKinsey & Co. argued in a recent paper that AI will aid commodities traders in predicting pricing and other factors involved in the highly complex futures market for metals and other items.

Related Stories:

 

AI Will Send Profits Skyward Over the Next 10 Years, Goldman Says

AI Application ChatGPT Beats Stock Market, Study Says

What Artificial Intelligence Can—and Can’t—Do for Investors

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«