Why Apartment REITs Are Primed to Move Up

In the push for alts, the beaten-up multi-family segment is gaining popularity, says research shop Green Street.


Alternative investments are increasingly sought-after by institutional investors, and among alts, real estate—in particular, real estate investment trusts—have a lot of promise.

What kinds of REITs show promise? Apartments.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

So says Green Street, a commercial real estate analytics firm.  It noted in a report that apartment REITs are staging a comeback and should resume their spot as leading performers, following a horrible 2022. That’s because Federal Reserve interest-rate hikes appear close to an end.

Why are apartment REITs a big deal? Apartments as a sector have a built-in advantage, both economic and demographic: Renting multi-family housing—as apartments are also called—is more affordable than buying dwellings. Prices for single-family homes remain elevated, as do mortgage rates. Millennials, the nation’s largest generation, are moving into real estate, but most start first in rented apartments. Plus, many Baby Boomers are retiring and looking to downsize from empty-nest houses to apartments.

The Fed-engineered rate spiral that began last year slammed REITs, which are pools of properties traded like stocks. As real estate depends on borrowing, REITs were especially vulnerable to the Fed’s tightening. Construction of new apartment buildings require a lot of debt.

Apartment REITs’ revenue stream appears to be copious and expanding. A Franklin Templeton report on alts found that “apartment rents have surged in response to consumers demanding more living space as lifestyles adjust to a new, more home-centric post-pandemic normal.” REITs, the report argued, “have the potential to provide investors with higher returns, higher income, lower volatility and diversification benefits relative to traditional investments.”

Green Street sees apartments’ cap rate, which measures its yield from rents based on the property price, expanding at a solid 6% in 2023. Rent growth should be low but positive for the next five years, the firm’s analysts say.

Among REITs, apartments this year have staged a comeback from 2022, according to FTSE Nareit data. Thus far in 2023, multi-family is up 10.9%, trailing only lodging and industrials (meaning factories and warehouses), which are ahead 14.8% and 12.6%, respectively. By contrast, over the past 12 months, apartments were the second-worst REIT performer, down 21.4%. Offices was the cellar-dweller, off 28%.

The pummeling that apartment REITs took last year has, in fact, made them value plays. The trusts are priced about one-third less than their underlying properties, according to Green Street.

Real estate, especially in REITs, is very popular among alts. A 2022 Nareit survey found that REITs grew 22% to $34.2 billion among the 200 largest retirement plans. What’s more, over five years, REITs grew faster than directly owned properties among allocators, with REIT assets increasing 40.7% versus 40.5% for directly owned.

Institutional investors are embracing alts in a big way: 86% of them now have money in alternative investments, per a 2021 survey done by Nuveen, the investment manager for TIAA. Real estate figures high on their investment lists.

The New York State Common Retirement Fund, for instance, last month announced it would invest $15 million into a fund that aims to buy or develop apartments, among other commercial uses. The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board is in a partnership to construct apartments in Brazil, as well as in Boston, Miami and Denver.

Related Stories:

When Will Beaten-Up Real Estate Turn Around?

Real Estate Remains a Haven Asset Class Amidst Market Volatility 

How Did Alts, a Jumble of Different Things, Get So Popular?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Oklahoma Taking Names as It Seeks to Weed Out ESG Investors

State Treasurer Todd Russ is making a list of companies that break the state’s anti-ESG law.

 


Oklahoma State Treasurer Todd Russ has sent questionnaires to national financial institutions to determine which companies are in breach of a state law requiring the state to boycott companies that shun fossil fuel investments. 

Russ said sending out the questionnaires is the first step in compiling a legally mandated list of companies that Oklahoma government entities are now prohibited by state law from doing business with because of their environmental, social and governance policies.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The state law, called the Energy Discrimination Elimination Act of 2022, was passed in May 2022 and went into effect in November 2022, . It declares the oil-and-gas industry a vital part of the economy and that the state and companies that do business with the state should not boycott the oil-and-gas industry. It prohibits the state from signing a contract with a company unless the company submits a written certification that it is not currently engaged in a boycott of the oil-and-gas industry.

“I took office on Jan[uary] 9 and began compiling a list of companies, banks, and other entities that act against Oklahoma’s interests because of their ESG stance,” Russ said in a release. “It is my responsibility to ensure Oklahomans’ tax dollars will not be used to enrich organizations that act counter to our taxpayers’ interests and our values.”

Russ said the questionnaire provides companies an opportunity to attest to their business actions as they relate to Oklahoma and noted that other states are taking similar steps. Texas, Florida, Utah, Missouri, Kentucky, Louisiana and West Virginia, among others, have all either proposed or passed anti-ESG legislation. Last month, 25 states with Republican attorneys general sued the Department of Labor to overturn its rule permitting ESG considerations in retirement investing.

The Oklahoma law mandates that any company that does not respond to the letter and provide Russ with written verification that they do not boycott Oklahoma energy companies within 60 days from the date of the February 1 letter—April 1—is “presumed to be engaged in discriminating activities” and will be put on a public list of financial companies deemed to be in breach of the law.

“This list is crucial to provide accountability for our government entities, including organizations responsible for pension funds such as the Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System and Teachers Retirement System,” Russ said. “OPERS alone has more than 60% of their portfolio totaling more than $10 billion managed by BlackRock, a well-known adversary of energy businesses.”

BlackRock, which has become the anti-ESG movement’s favorite whipping boy, recently released a statement that it “does not boycott energy companies and will continue to be investors across the energy sector.” The world’s largest asset manager also said it has invested a total of approximately $276 billion in energy companies worldwide.

 

Related Stories:

Kentucky Treasurer Targets 11 Firms for ‘Energy Company Boycotts’

What Consultants Tell Clients About Navigating Treacherous ESG Shoals

25 States and 3 Fossil Fuel Industry Actors Sue to Block DOL Rule Permitting ESG Investing

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

«