What Makes an Attractive Private Equity Firm?

Jonathan Grabel, CIO, New Mexico PERA, on what great private equity firms are—and are not.

“Fundamentally, you want to put money with firms with great cultures. This is true across the asset management industry. And the same is true when a private shop is looking at a deal: the most important thing is management.

Most good private equity investors tell you they will pick a great team over a great idea. A great team can make a good idea great; a bad team can make a great idea not great. The firm should be collaborative; it should be judgment-free. People should learn from their mistakes. Mistakes happen; mistakes shouldn’t be institutionalized or siloed. They need to be a learning organization.

GPs should encourage a certain amount of openness. There should be opportunities for merit and to grow the next generation. There should be cross-pollination of ideas. You don’t want to see firms that are too structured or siloed. You want to see a firm that understands all aspects of the business. You don’t want someone focusing on originating a deal and not living with that portfolio company; you don’t want people structuring deals and not being involved with the origination or execution; you don’t want people who are just focused on the transaction. You want people who are focused on every aspect of the organization because it makes them better for it. It makes them better at it.

You want a firm that is open to change; times evolve. You want a firm that is hungry. You don’t want a firm that takes imprudent risk, but we as asset owners pay a heck of a lot of money to these firms. We want firms that are populated with people who are super smart, that are goal-aligned, and who want to make a lot of money. You want firms that have the most passionate people about their investments and what they do. At the same time, you want firms that are dispassionate. They don’t fall in love with the portfolio companies and know that if it isn’t working, rather than putting in more money or changing out management, they look to sell and potentially limit their losses. That dispassionate nature of investing needs to exist.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

You want firms to understand whose capital it is that they are investing. That their fiduciary duty to their partners is aligned and they don’t fall in love with being on corporate boards and being best friends with CEOs of portfolio companies.

I am going to keep going because I think there are a lot of things that make great firms. You want diversity in firms. You don’t want sameness. Similar backgrounds produce similar thinking. Multi-dimensional diversity at GPs is healthy. You want diversity of age, training, gender, and race—you name it. That is very important.”

Jonathan Grabel1Jonathan Grabel is the CIO of the Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico.

Have a brilliant idea? CIO welcomes original contributions from asset owners. Send op-eds, research drafts, rants or raves to Managing Editor Leanna Orr at lorr@assetinternational.com.

Fidelity Terminates Transition Management Head

Kevin Byrne, a well-respected industry veteran, lost his job over “failure to supervise,” CIO has learned.

Fidelity Investments has dismissed its head of transition management Kevin Byrne due to his “failure to supervise” junior staff, multiple sources with knowledge of the situation told CIO

According to insiders, a subordinate on Byrne’s team executed an unauthorized transaction on a trader’s unlocked workstation in May, resulting in the immediate dismissal of one Fidelity employee. Byrne was said to be traveling during the incident. 

His nearly five-year tenure at the corporation ended on June 12 with his termination, sources said.

A Fidelity spokesperson would only comment on the current status of the team’s leadership, and the division’s role with the company going forward.  

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“John Donahue, the senior vice president and head of equities for Fidelity Capital Markets, is currently serving as the head of the transition management group and we remain committed to this business,” she said.

Byrne led the division as a vice president since August 2010, according to his LinkedIn profile, which still lists him as a Fidelity executive.

Several industry insiders described Byrne as a well-respected transition management professional. 

Prior to joining Fidelity, Byrne spent four and a half years as a managing director with BNY ConvergEx. 

That firm’s transition management business later saw its own controversy. In 2012, well after Byrne had departed, CIO first reported that the firm was charging clients both a commission and a spread on transitions, among other transactions. The former global head of execution has been banned from the securities industry for five years and ConvergEx itself admitted wrongdoing when charged by regulators in 2013. 

Fidelity’s spokesperson would not confirm nor comment on any of the circumstances surrounding Byrne’s departure. “As a matter of policy, we don’t comment on personnel matters,” she said.

Related: 2014 Transition Management Survey; Ex-JPM Transitions Chief Joins New Market Entrant ConvergEx Hit with $150M Fine for Overcharging Clients

Additional reporting by Elizabeth Pfeuti

«