As Virus Punishes Stocks, El-Erian Warns: Don’t Buy the Dips

Pummeled shares will take a lot longer to recover than normal, Allianz economist says.

Buy the dip has been the oft-repeated advice during the 10-year-long bull market. But as exchanges worldwide reel from the baleful economic effects of the coronavirus, economist Mohamed El-Erian warned investors to back off the practice.

While scooping up declining shares cheaply worked in the past, because they promptly sprung back, he told CNBC, “I would continue to resist, as hard as it is, to simply buy the dip.” And that’s especially true for the stocks that have been the worst hammered amid the current rout, added El-Erian, the chief economic adviser at financial powerhouse Allianz.

The scourge of COVID-9, as the disease is also known, will be so thorough that recovery “will take time,” he said. “Economic sudden stops are hard to restart.” Previously, he had predicted that the virus would “paralyze China” and the results would “cascade throughout the world.”

As fears mounted about the spreading contagion, the S&P 500 on Tuesday plunged slightly more than 3% for the second day in a row. Airline, cruise ship, technology, and financial services stocks have suffered. Those with ties to China such as Apple (which uses Chinese factories to assemble iPhones) and Starbucks (whose coffee shops do big business in the world’s second largest economy) were slammed. Over the past two days, Apple is down 8% and Starbucks fell 5.7%.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Other economists are echoing El-Erian’s pessimism. Oxford Economics says that a global health crisis could erase $1 trillion from the global economy, estimated to be $86.6 trillion in 2019. Reasons for such a major loss include higher workplace absenteeism, lower productivity, reduced travel, disrupted supply chains, less international trade, and muted investing.

To David Levy, chairman of the Jerome Levy Forecasting Center, “at best, the economic effects of the COVID-19 outbreak are likely to be much worse than widely anticipated.”

Earnings forecasts are trending lower, at least partly as a result. The US consensus estimate for first-quarter domestic growth has dipped to 1.5%, down from 1.7% at year-end 2019, FactSet Research announced. Goldman Sachs recently warned that shrinking, virus-related earnings could lead to a market correction, which is a 10% slide from its peak.

Related Stories:

Goldman Warns Coronavirus Could Bring a Market Correction Soon

Chinese Virus Could Be a ‘Black Swan Like No Other’: Moody’s

Economic Harm from Virus: 0.4% Off World GDP

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

JP Morgan Chase Commits $200 Billion to Sustainability Financing

Often cited as a climate offender, the bank has capped lending to coal mining and Arctic drilling projects.

JPMorgan Chase said Tuesday that it’s committing $200 billion in financing this year to expand its sustainability goals, which include imposing restrictions on lending to coal mining companies and ending direct funding of Arctic drilling projects.

The bank said it will no longer lend to capital markets or give advisory services to companies that get a majority of their revenues from coal extraction. By 2024, the bank said it will phase out its remaining credit exposure to those businesses.

The financial firm will also cap funding for any new coal power plant “unless it is utilizing carbon capture and sequestration technology.” Additionally, the bank said it will no longer finance new oil and gas projects in the Arctic.

JPMorgan Chase has often drawn the ire of climate activists, who argue that the second largest global bank—with $2.7 trillion in assets—has remained the biggest funder of fossil fuels.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Environmental groups point out that the commitment closely mirrors similar pledges recently made by European banks and Goldman Sachs, which have also restricted funding for coal, oil, and gas. Climate advocates argue that the targets may be too small. 

The restriction “is a long-awaited signal that JPMorgan Chase may be ending its outsized level of fossil fuel financing in the face of growing climate concern,” Danielle Fugere, president of shareholder advocacy group As You Sow, said in a statement.

“Yet, JPMorgan has not agreed to bring its full carbon footprint into alignment with the Paris goal. Until it agrees to do so, its fossil fuel funding remains a clear threat to the global goal of avoiding catastrophic warming,” Fugere added. In 2016, the Paris Agreement set a global target to bring greenhouse emissions to net zero by 2050. 

Previously, the bank in 2017 set a $200 billion clean financing target for 2025, as well as a commitment to source renewable energy for its global power needs by this year. The firm said it will meet both targets.

A quarter, or $50 billion, of this year’s commitment will also satisfy the 2017 clean financing goal, which goes toward projects such as clean water and health care initiatives in the developing world.

Other commitments include an increased focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) solutions, such as a group to advise clients on how best to reduce their carbon emissions. The bank plans to create ESG indexes focused on fixed income.

Related Stories:

Davos Report Says Climate Change Striking Harder than Expected

Europe’s Largest Pension Fund Vows to Be Climate Neutral by 2050

Op-Ed: Why CIOs Should Engage on Climate and Take Action

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«