Virginia Pension in Worse Shape to Weather Crash than in 2008

Stress test finds state system remains at risk despite pension reforms.

Virginia’s pension fund is less prepared today for a market crash than it was before the Great Recession when its funding status tumbled nearly 25% in a single year, according to a recent stress test report analyzing the Virginia Retirement System (VRS).

“If a repeat of the five-year returns observed by the pension plan from fiscal year 2008 to 2012 were to occur beginning in fiscal year 2020, the state plan would be in a worse position to absorb the impacts of the investment losses than it was in 2009,” said the report.

The analysis said the state’s pension plan would see an increase in unfunded liability of approximately $6.9 billion, peaking at $12.5 billion in 2026. And because actuarial losses are amortized over 20-year periods, the plan could see increased contribution rates through 2047.

The report also said that employer rates could increase to over 22% of covered payroll within a few years of a market crash. And because the statewide plans have not paid down the legacy unfunded liabilities, an additional investment loss of the extent seen in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 would potentially put the state plan’s funded status below 55%.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Although that’s under a worst-case scenario, the outlook for the system is still rather subdued with less dire, but still undesirable, market returns.

If the VRS fund only returns 5% annually each of the next five years, the state plan would see an increase in unfunded liability of approximately $2.2 billion, peaking at $7.8 billion in 2027, according to the stress test. As a result, employer rates could increase to approximately 15.5% over the next 10 years.

Additionally, under this scenario of lower-than-expected returns, the plan’s funded status would lose approximately 10% of its value. The estimated additional funding that would be required to pay down five consecutive years of lower-than-expected returns would start at $5.5 million in fiscal year 2023, and gradually increase to approximately $280 million in fiscal year 2041.

The report also said that if lower-than-expected returns of 5% continued for 10 years, the impact would be even greater. It said the state’s pension plan would see an increase in unfunded liability of approximately $4.2 billion, peaking at $9.5 billion in 2032. And employer rates could increase to over 18% over the next 10 years.

In a sustained period of 5% in each of the next 10 years, the funded status would lose approximately 15% of its value, and the additional funding needed would start at $5.5 million in fiscal year 2023 and gradually rise to approximately $550 million in fiscal year 2041.

“In 2008-2009, financial markets crashed around the world resulting in the worst annual investment performance on record for VRS,” said the report. “Since that time, even with the pension reforms and more diligent funding of the state-wide plans by the governor and general assembly, the system remains at risk if another investment return shock were to occur.”

Related Stories:

Virginia Retirement System Returns 7.5%

Virginia Retirement System Releases Annual Oversight Report

Tags: , ,

Georgia County Manager Charged with Pension Fraud

Romantic interest allegedly led manager to mislead pensions.

A former county manager in Georgia has been charged with fraud for allegedly misleading pension boards to hire an unnamed investment adviser because of a romantic interest he had with one of the firm’s consultants.

The SEC says former Bibb County Manager Dale Walker misled three Macon-Bibb County public pension fund boards in connection with their selection of an investment adviser to manage a combined $402 million in pension fund assets. As county manager, Walker was a member of the board of directors of one of the three Macon-Bibb County pension funds.

“Walker had a personal conflict of interest which led him to provide a specific investment adviser with an unfair competitive advantage in the request for proposal process,” said the SEC in its complaint. “Walker had an undisclosed personal relationship with an individual associated with the adviser.”

According to the complaint, which was filed with the US District Court Middle District of Georgia Macon Division, Walker met someone in 2007 who worked for the state retirement system where he was a member of the board at the time. It said he “developed a romantic interest” in the individual, who the complaint identified as “Associate A.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

In late 2013, Walker learned that Associate A had become a consultant with the unnamed adviser, and reached out to Associate A to discuss a potential business opportunity. The complaint said during 2013 and continuing into 2015, Walker began to regularly contact Associate A and repeatedly expressed his romantic feelings. During that time, Walker also sent numerous personal gifts.

As chief administrative officer for the City of Macon, and as county manager for Macon-Bibb County, Walker had authority to hire an investment adviser to provide cash management services for certain non-pension fund related financial accounts of the city and county. In late 2013, Walker selected the unnamed adviser to provide these services to the City of Macon, and in early 2014, to Macon-Bibb County.

The SEC said Walker “undermined the integrity of the pension fund boards’ selection process in several ways.”  It said he allegedly allowed the adviser to review the confidential proposals of other investment adviser candidates and asked the adviser to draft a written analysis of the proposals and create a numeric ranking of all the applicants. The adviser ranked itself first above all other applicants.

According to the complaint, Walker then took credit for the adviser’s analysis and ranking and attached them to his own memos to the pension fund boards in which he recommended the adviser be selected for all of the pension funds.

“The three pension funds were given copies of all proposals submitted by all candidates, but were unaware of the Adviser’s role in the recommendation process and the associated conflict of interest,” said the complaint. “Each of the three pension fund boards followed Walker’s recommendation and selected the adviser as the investment adviser for their respective pension funds.”

Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Walker consented to pay a $10,000 fine, and is no longer allowed to advise any government entity on pension- or municipal security-related activities.

Related Stories:

SEC Charges Volkswagen with Defrauding Bond Investors

SEC Charges Four in Elaborate Microcap Stock Fraud

 

Tags: , , , , ,

«