Union Files Legal Challenge Over OMERS’ Early Retirement Policy

The Canadian Union of Public Employees is also calling for a review of the pension fund’s investment decisions.


A Canadian union has filed a legal challenge with Ontario’s independent pension regulator over the $82.4 billion Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS)’s policy for paramedic plan members’ access to early retirement options.

According to the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), OMERS has two classifications for its members: normal retirement age 65 (NRA 65) and normal retirement age 60 (NRA 60). NRA 65 members can retire with an unreduced pension at the age of 65 at the earliest, or 30 years of service, and the earliest retirement age is age 55. NRA 60 members can retire with an unreduced pension at age 60 at the earliest, or after 30 years of service, and their earliest retirement age is 50.

CUPE, which filed the legal challenge with the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario (FSRA), says OMERS had prohibited unions representing paramedics from negotiating earlier retirement options with employers from 2005 to 2020, despite police and firefighters in the plan already having earlier retirement options. OMERS extended the earlier retirement option to paramedic members beginning Jan. 1 of this year; however, CUPE said OMERS’ rules for transitioning paramedic members from NRA 65 to NRA 60 put members at risk of a reduced pension.

“Paramedics have been demanding that OMERS allow them fair access to earlier retirement options for over a decade,” Fred Hahn, president of CUPE Ontario, said in a statement. “Now OMERS is saying working paramedics can transition to earlier retirement options only at the risk of deep cuts to their pensions. This is completely unacceptable, and these front-line workers simply deserve better.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

CUPE also released a scathing report that criticizes OMERS for its investment portfolio’s underperformance for 2020 and over the longer term. OMERS reported a 2.7% loss for 2020, well off its benchmark’s return of 6.9%, marking the first time the pension fund has reported a loss since the financial crisis of 2008. As a result, the fund’s total net assets fell by C$4 billion to C$105 billion ($82.4 billion). The fund also reported three-, five-, 10-, and 20-year annualized returns of 3.7%, 6.5%, 6.7%, and 6.0%, respectively. The union has called for an independent third party to review OMERS’ investment policy and strategy.

“CUPE Ontario feels these issues are so serious that a fully transparent expert review of OMERS investment strategies, returns, and internal performance assessment is urgently needed,” said the report. “This review should be conducted by the plan sponsors and stakeholders themselves … and should be fully independent of OMERS staff, who have a clear conflict of interest in conducting a review of their own performance.”

The union said OMERS’ claim that its 2.7% loss was due to the economic impacts of COVID-19 is unsupported, and it points to other major pension plans that were investing in the same economic climate but had better returns.

“There are some undeniable, systemic, and long-standing issues,” Hahn said. “The serious longer-term underperformance of OMERS merits an expert, independent review, conducted by sponsors and other representatives of plan members. We’ll keep pushing for an independent review of OMERS’ poor long-term investment record.”

An OMERS spokesperson told CIO that the pension fund is aware of the announcement CUPE issued and that it will cooperate fully with any questions or insights FSRA needs. It also said that because the matter involves one of its sponsors and its regulator, it will not comment further.

Related Stories:

OMERS Takes 25% Stake in International Schools Partnership

OMERS Reports First Annual Loss Since Financial Crisis

OMERS Selects Infrastructure Veteran as New Chief Pension Officer

Tags: , , , , , ,

Apollo Might Launch $500 Million SPAC Fund

The private equity firm reportedly will use the investment vehicle to buy stakes in IPOs and founders’ shares.


Apollo Global Management is raising $500 million to launch a fund to invest in special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), according to reports from Reuters and Bloomberg. Although the amount accounts for just a fraction of the private equity firm’s $472 billion in assets under management (AUM), the proposed fund would be one of the first of its kind.

SPACs are shell companies that raise money for stock market initial public offerings (IPO) and then merge with a private company in order to take the company public. SPACs are considered a fast and relatively inexpensive way to take a company public. They are required to use the IPO capital to acquire a functioning company within two years, or they have to return the money to the investors. The proposed Apollo fund reportedly will use a broad strategy that includes buying stakes in IPOs and founders’ shares.

Although SPACs have become a popular way of taking companies public over the past year or two, the reports of the proposed Apollo fund come as SPAC activity has appeared to cool off a bit this summer after the SEC issued a warning about them. However, recent SPAC deals include digital publisher BuzzFeed, grocery courier Boxed, robotics platform Bright Machines, and vaccine developer Greenlight Biosciences.  

And the Apollo-sponsored Spartan series of special purpose acquisition vehicles have recently either announced or completed combinations with electric vehicle maker Fisker, residential solar financing fintech firm Sunlight Financial, and pan-European electric vehicle charging company Allego.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Apollo Global Management would not comment on the reports.

Related Stories:

Good SPAC, Bad SPAC: How the Jiffy IPO Method Is Regaining Favor

So, SPACs Are Dead Meat? Not a Chance

Bill Miller Isn’t Buying the Negative Take on SPACs

Tags: , , , , ,

«