UK Seeks Input on DB Superfund Consolidation Rules

Regulator will scrutinize all superfunds to identify potential risks.

Defined benefit superfunds seeking to enter the UK market will have to communicate to The Pensions Regulator (TPR) their plans before opening for business, according to new guidance from the regulator. The UK government is also seeking consultation on a new legislative framework for authorizing and regulating defined benefit superfund consolidation schemes.

In a move intended to help protect pension participants, TPR has outlined its expectations for defined benefit superfunds that intend to operate before an authorization regime is put in place, and while the authorization framework planned by government is under consultation.

Superfunds are defined benefit pension plans established to accept bulk transfers of assets and liabilities from other defined benefit plans. Instead of an ongoing employer covenant, member security comes from a capital buffer provided by the former sponsor and investors who expect to profit from the arrangement.

The guidance states that TPR will scrutinize all defined benefit superfunds that enter the market to make sure any risks are identified, assessed, and mitigated.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“We believe DB superfunds are potentially a force for good and can provide a secure and safe place for pension saving and help drive up standards,” David Fairs, executive director of regulatory policy, analysis, and advice at TPR, said in a release. “However, as these schemes come to market, we need to give savers confidence now that these schemes are well-governed, run by fit and proper people, and are backed by adequate capital.”

Fairs added that by coming to TPR now, superfunds can show the regulator how they plan to meet the regulatory and governmental standards, and prevent possible regulatory action in the future.

The UK’s Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) consultation on consolidation of defined benefit pension plans proposes a range of areas in which TPR will have to be satisfied. TPR said its guidance reflects the consultation proposals.

The consultation seeks views on a new legislative framework for authorizing and regulating defined benefit superfund consolidation plans. It gives an indication of the government’s policy intentions and likely focus of the legislation.

According to the DWP, the advantages of a superfund are that it can protect savers through a capital buffer, which will provide greater security by reducing the risks associated with future employer insolvencies.

A superfund can also provide an alternative way for employers in certain circumstances to separate themselves from legacy pension arrangements by moving closed pension plans into a superfund, allowing them to focus on the day-to-day running of their business. The DWP also said superfunds improve the likelihood of members’ benefits being paid in full.

Hard Brexit Could Raise UK Pension Deficit by £219 Billion

Report also says a ‘soft Brexit’ could reduce pension deficits and liabilities.

A hard Brexit will likely be difficult for UK pension funds, and could cause their aggregate buy-out deficit to increase by as much as 37%, or £219 billion, and their liabilities to rise 14%, according to a report from specialist risk manager Cardano. 

“Brexit presents a very different challenge to UK pension funds, financial markets, and the national economy,” Kerrin Rosenberg, Cardano’s UK CEO, said in a release. “Since the EU Referendum we have had this political event dominate the markets’ mood and attention—yet the quantum and characteristics of the potential market and economic impacts remain relatively unknown.” 

According to Cardano’s analysis, a hard Brexit scenario would initially lead to the Bank of England easing policy and lowering growth expectations, which would likely lead to lower gilt yields and a declining pound. Conversely, the firm said a so-called soft Brexit would enable growth and could increase the pace of Bank of England rate hikes, strengthen the pound, and send gilt yields higher. This could result in a 9% drop in liabilities, and reduce the buy-out deficit by 24% or £138 billion, said the report.

“As we enter into 2019, Brexit will be just one of a range of risk factors that schemes should be proactively addressing in their portfolio positioning,” said Rosenberg. “We have reached inflection points across a number of fronts: the potential impact of monetary tightening, the global growth trajectory, and rising protectionism should be front of mind for trustee and their advisers going into the New Year.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Cardano’s risk model indicates the 14% rise in aggregate UK pension liabilities would be spurred by the impact of falling gilt yields, a weakened sterling, and a corresponding rise in inflation on long-term pension obligations. However, it also showed that a hard Brexit scenario could lead to a 6% spike in UK pension assets due to “currency tailwinds” because the potential fall in sterling would be positive for the international constituents of the FTSE 100 and pensions’ allocation to global equity and debt. On the other hand, this potential improvement would be canceled out by a 14% rise in liabilities, thus expanding the UK’s aggregate funding gap.

“As we enter into 2019, Brexit will be just one of a range of risk factors that schemes should be proactively addressing in their portfolio positioning, said Rosenberg. “The risks to schemes’ funding positions should not be underestimated, and we would encourage UK schemes to think critically about the scale and scope of risks that Brexit may present and to act now—before it is too late.”

«