UK Pensions Funded Level Accelerates in February

Total deficit for private sector DB plans shrinks 41% over the past year.

The funding level of all UK private sector defined benefit pension plans reached 94% at the end of February, which is up 1% from the previous month, and 4% from the same time last year, according to JLT Employee Benefits (JLT).

Meanwhile, the funding level of the defined benefit pension plans of the FTSE 100 companies climbed to 97% from 95% at the end of the previous month, and 93% at the end of February 2017. The funding level of the FTSE 350 companies’ DB plans was 96% as of Feb. 28, compared to 95% at Jan. 31, and 92% at the same time last year.

“Once again, markets have been reasonably benign for pension schemes this month and overall reported pension deficits have continued to drift downwards,” said Charles Cowling, director, JLT Employee Benefits, in a release. “However, this positive picture masks ongoing challenges for a number of companies with large pension schemes, evidenced this week by news that the Toys R Us pension scheme will soon be following Carillion’s scheme into the Pension Protection Fund (PPF).”

Cowling said one of the key problems for many companies is that the pension deficit calculated by its trustees is significantly greater than the pension deficit reported in the employer’s accounts.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“Moreover, actuarial valuations currently being conducted are likely to show a need for significant increases in cash funding,” he added. “This will come as a difficult message for both schemes and sponsors, at a time when the tension between funding deficits and paying dividends to shareholders has already spilled over.”

The total deficit of all UK private sector DB plans fell to £105 billion at the end of February, from £124 billion at the end January, and £180 billion at the same period last year. Meanwhile, the aggregate deficit for the DB plans of the FTSE 100 companies dropped to £24 billion from £35 billion a month ago, and was cut by more than half during the past 12 months from £52 billion. The deficit for the FTSE 300 DB plans declined to £32 billion from £44 billion as of Jan. 31, and £63 billion at the end of February 2017.

Although the overall value of total assets fell from last month, and the year-ago period for UK DB plans, they declined at a slower rate than falling liabilities, which allowed their deficits to shrink. Total assets for all UK DB plans dropped to £1.524 trillion from £1.555 trillion at the end of January, and £1.571 trillion at the same time last year. Meanwhile, their liabilities declined to £1.629 trillion from £1.679 trillion a month ago, and £1.751 trillion a year ago.

At Feb. 28, 2018

Assets

Liabilities

Surplus / (Deficit)

Funding Level

FTSE 100 Companies

£667 billion

£691 billion

(£24 billion)

97%

FTSE 350 Companies

£753 billion

£785 billion

(£32 billion)

96%

All UK Private Sector Pensions

£1.524 trillion

£1.629 trillion

(£105 billion)

94%

At Jan. 31, 2018

Assets

Liabilities

Surplus / (Deficit)

Funding Level

FTSE 100 Companies

£678 billion

£713 billion

(£35 billion)

95%

FTSE 350 Companies

£765 billion

£809 billion

(£44 billion)

95%

All UK Private Sector Pensions

£1.555 trillion

£1.679 trillion

(£124 billion)

93%

At Feb. 28, 2017

Assets

Liabilities

Surplus / (Deficit)

Funding Level

FTSE 100 Companies

£673 billion

£725 billion

(£52 billion)

93%

FTSE 350 Companies

£760 billion

£823 billion

(£63 billion)

92%

All UK Private Sector Pension

£1.571 trillion

£1.751 trillion

(£180 billion)

90%

Source: JLT Employee Benefits

Tags: , , ,

Reducing Personal Risk for ERISA CIOs

CIOs are personally liable for breaches, but there are steps to create more safety.

 

When we make the rounds in the CIO community, we find that CIOs know that investing plan assets means acting as an ERISA fiduciary and having a duty to act prudently and in the best interests of participants.

What many CIOs may not know, or perhaps would prefer not to think too much about, is that they are personally liable for breaches. Given the stakes, there are actionable steps CIOs should take today to reduce their legal risk.

  1. Stay Current with Your Peers

ERISA may be over 40 years old, but the law is constantly adapting to a changing system and changing best practices in the fiduciary expert community. For example, as defined contribution line-ups evolve and baby boomers face complex draw-down decisions, CIOs are shouldering important decision-making roles. Developments and actions taken by similarly situated peer experts will form the basis for what is prudent and appropriate under ERISA.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

An effective way to stay current is by participating in peer-to-peer webinars and conferences highlighting legal and investment developments, like those offered by CIEBA and other groups. It’s also wise to memorialize attendance at these events to create a record that the CIO is, in fact, staying current on what their fellow experts are doing.

Also, CIOs should consider periodic fiduciary training for their staff. Regular trainings create both a record of diligence and a culture that encourages staff to go back to their desks and review what they do every day. 

  1. Know Your Insurance and Indemnification

CIOs need to ensure that they are personally protected from liability claims and the cost to defend such claims. Most CIOs are covered by insurance policies and employer indemnifications, but the coverages can vary. Be sure you understand what is covered and how to use insurance policies. At the very least, know where to find your policy and what circumstances warrant a closer look. 

Similarly, CIOs need to understand whether their employer is providing an indemnity and what that indemnity covers. It is important to confirm that the company agrees to provide independent legal counsel in the event CIOs are personally named in a lawsuit or investigation.  Nine times out of 10, a CIO’s interests are in-line with the employer’s, but in the event they are not, CIOs need protection. 

  1. Document, Document, Document!

CIOs are not required to guarantee successful results, but they must employ a “prudent expert” process (not just a “prudent layman” process). The foundation of a prudent process is an effective governance structure.  CIOs should:

  • Periodically review governing documents (e.g., committee charters and guidelines) to make sure they are consistent and current;
  • Ensure investment committees meet regularly and that members are attending, even via conference call (just ask Enron’s lawyers how stellar member attendance records were when it came time to defend); and
  • Maintain committee decisions by preparing minutes that include rationales, options considered, and relevant expert materials.
  1. Don’t Ignore Warning Signs

The most direct risk for CIOs is the plaintiffs’ bar. Over the past decade, class-action litigation has increased dramatically. For example, there have been at least 80 lawsuits challenging plan fees and settlements ranging to upwards of $62 million.

There are typically warning signs months in advance and staying attentive can give lawyers a leg up when it comes to vigorously defending. Pay attention to announcements in newspapers or company bulletin boards and watch for unusual or overly broad document requests from participants. 

Consider immediately alerting relevant parties (e.g., insurer, corporate counsel) and conducting a review of the plan to proactively identify issues and allow a more effective response. It is also often worth beginning the process of retaining an attorney and consulting with the plan sponsor’s insurer as early as possible.

Dennis Simmons is the Executive Director of the Committee on Investment of Employee Benefit Assets (CIEBA), a trade group comprised of more than 100 of the country’s most experienced ERISA CIOs and fiduciaries.  Michael Kreps is a Principal at the Groom Law Group where he advises retirement plan fiduciaries and service providers.

 

Tags: , , ,

«