UK Launches Pension Freedoms Inquiry

Parliament seeks to ensure freedoms aren’t liberating Britons from their savings.

The British Parliament’s Work & Pensions Committee has launched an inquiry into whether the pension freedom and choice reforms enacted in 2015 are achieving their objectives, and if policy changes are needed.

In April 2015, tax rules changes, known as the “pension freedoms,” were launched to give Britons greater access to their pensions by taxing the withdrawal of pension income at marginal rates, rather than the previous 55% rate. The changes also gave participants access to free and impartial retirement planning guidance through a program called Pension Wise.

The committee said that one of its major concerns about the new freedoms is the potential for fraud to be committed against people who are considering accessing or moving their pension pots. It cited police data showing that more than £43 million ($58 million) in retirement savings have been lost to fraud since the policy change was announced.

“It is vital that adequate support ensures people are equipped to ensure they don’t make decisions they subsequently regret,” said Frank Field, MP and chair of the committee. “I am particularly concerned that savers are more vulnerable than ever to unscrupulous scam artists. This policy must not become the freedom to liberate people of their savings.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The committee said it is also concerned that people are not making educated decisions about accessing their pension pots, citing research that shows that only 7% of people aged 55 and older who are planning to retire in the next two years have used the Pension Wise guidance service.

The committee said it wants to hear from people about their experiences with scammers, as well as any suggestions as to what might be done to prevent others from getting scammed. It is calling for written evidence by Oct. 23. Some of the questions it is asking the public include:

  • What are people doing with their pension pots and are those decisions consistent with their objectives? Is there adequate monitoring of the decisions being made?
  • Are the government and Financial Conduct Authority taking adequate steps to prevent scamming and mis-selling?
  • Is there evidence of product market competition resulting in cheaper, clearer, or wider products for consumers? Are people switching from their pension provider in accessing their pots? Is an adequate annuity market being sustained?
  • Is Pension Wise working? If not, how should it be reformed?
  • Are there persistent gaps in the advice and guidance market, and what might fill them? Is automated advice and guidance filling gaps as expected?

Tags: , , ,

Colorado Retirement Board Endorses Reforms

Proposed changes would reduce benefits and require more contributions.

In an attempt to reach full funding faster, the Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association’s (PERA) board of trustees voted in favor of a raft of changes that would reduce retirement benefits and require public employees and taxpayers to contribute more.

The recommended changes, which are intended to reduce the overall risk profile of the plan and improve its funded status, include benefit reductions for current and future members and retirees, as well as contribution increases for members and employers.

“The recommendations from the PERA Board reflect our commitment to ensuring the long-term health of the fund,” said Timothy O’Brien, board chairman of the PERA. “We understand that these recommended changes will not be easy, but we believe shared impact across the membership and with employers are absolutely necessary.”

The package of changes, which must be approved by the Colorado general assembly, includes recommendations that will significantly alter the benefit provisions and contribution structure of the plan. The proposal incorporates three major changes:

1) Benefits Reduction: 

The number of years used to calculate the highest average salary would be raised to five years from three for most participants. For new hires starting in 2020, and for members with less than five years of service credit as of January 1, 2020, more years of salary will be considered to calculate an average salary used to determine the total retirement benefit.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The proposal would also reduce the cost of living adjustments (COLA)The 2% annual increase for most current retirees would be lowered to 1.5%. For members who joined after 2006, the annual increase, which is based on the CPI, would be cut to 1.5% from 2%. It also suggests suspending the annual increase for two years for current benefit recipients, while future retirees would have a three-year waiting period before their annual increase begins.

Additionally, the new rules would change the age of eligibility for full-service retirement benefits to 65 for new hires starting in 2020. For state troopers, the minimum age for full-service retirement eligibility would be raised to 55.

2) Increase Contributions into the Fund: 

The changes also call for an increase in employee contributions for members hired before Jan. 1, 2020, by an additional 3% above current contribution rates. They also seek to increase employee contributions for members hired on or after Jan. 1, 2020, by an additional 2% percent, and raise employer contributions by an additional 2%.

3) Ensure the Equitable Alignment of “Input” and “Output:”

The package would change the definition of PERA-includable salary so that PERA contributions would be made on gross pay rather than net pay. It would also change the definition of full-time service accrual. Under the Board’s proposal, PERA future members will earn service credit for part-time work based on the percentage of full-time employment they are actually working.

The board also suggested instituting an automatic mechanism by which employer and employee contributions, as well as annual increase amounts, will adjust based on the financial condition of the fund.

“PERA will be working with members of the general assembly to ensure the board’s proposal receives serious consideration in the 2018 legislative session,” said PERA Executive Director Gregory Smith. “These changes impact every member, whether they are still working or retired, and will require difficult sacrifices.”

Tags: , , ,

«