UBS: Why Emerging Markets Should Romp—and It’s Not All China

Changes in inflation, interest rates and the dollar are expected to factor into an EM resurgence.


Emerging markets have had a tough time and only recently have begun to, well, emerge again. Part of that owes to the reopening of China from its COVID-19 lockdown, as China makes up one-third of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

But China’s turnaround is not the only reason for the improvement in EMs’ fortunes, according to a UBS research paper. Abating inflation, the Federal Reserve’s slowing rate hikes, a weakening dollar and tech stocks’ impediments are other important elements, the bank’s report stated.

The EM index this year, through Monday, is up 6.7%, not far behind the S&P 500, the standard U.S. gauge, at 7.1%. That implies a rebound from a long stretch of underperformance for emerging-market shares. Among expected winners for 2023 are India, South Korea and Mexico.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

For many years before 2022 (when everything fared poorly), American stocks were doing far better, riding a wave of tech mania that less-developed nations did not possess. In 2021, U.S. names clocked 26.9%, compared with negative 2.5% for EMs. Over the past 10 years, ending in December 2022, the S&P skunked the MSCI EM, 12.6% to 1.5%.

China has come thundering back this year, to be sure, with the Shanghai Composite  increasing 4.1% year to date. Over the past 12 months, thanks to the lockdown, it was in the red, 5.4%. Now, however, the Chinese reopening is producing a “positive spillover effect into other emerging markets,” UBS observed. China’s stocks should outpace the rest of the world, thus further propelling EMs, the bank predicted.

Regardless of how China’s stocks do, EM stocks’ outperformance “has further to run,” UBS reckons. One strong influence is the peaking of U.S. inflation and a weaker dollar. The Consumer Price Index dropped to 5.7% in December 2022, down from a high of 6.6% in September. (The CPI report for January is due February 14.) As a result, the Federal Reserve is expected to slow its tightening campaign.

“This downshift speaks in favor of fading Fed hawkishness over the course of the year … [and] is supportive of emerging market assets,” UBS commented. “The U.S. dollar has started to depreciate, and longer-term interest rates have started to decline, thus helping to loosen financial conditions in many emerging economies.” Indeed, the dollar has dropped 8% from its September 2022 peak.

The EM nations often depend on dollar-denominated borrowing costs, and some even have their currencies pegged to the greenback.

Meanwhile, U.S. tech is coming back, but not strong enough to provide the pizzazz that fueled the American stock rally through 2021—good news for EM stocks, as the entire world is no longer passing them by to bet on the U.S. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite has a long way to go to make up lost ground: It has shed 14.9% over the last 12 months, down twice as much as the S&P 500 for the same period.

The UBS projection is that EM stocks will “deliver mid- to high-single-digit positive returns this year.”

Related Stories:

PIMCO Sees Opportunity in Emerging Markets Bonds

Where to Find the Best Emerging Markets Returns

Institutional Investors Take a Cautious, Long-Term Approach to Emerging Markets

EBSA Secretary Defends ESG Rule as Legislative, Litigation Battles Continue

The issue of considering ESG in retirement plans is becoming increasingly polarized.



The Department of Labor’s assistant secretary of labor for employee benefits security, Lisa Gomez, defended the DOL’s final rule allowing the consideration of ESG factors in retirement plan investments at a webinar hosted Monday by Ceres, a sustainability advocate.

The rule, which took effect on January 30, permits, but does not require, the use of ESG considerations in investment selection by retirement plan fiduciaries. There is a pending lawsuit in Texas challenging the legality of the rule.

Gomez explained that this rule is “not a per se requirement” to use ESG and clarifies that ESG factors may be considered as part of a fiduciary’s ordinary risk-return analysis. She also explained that this new rule does not allow fiduciaries to sacrifice the financial health of a plan to pursue other goals: A fiduciary may consider the risks and opportunities of climate change and other ESG factors.

Gomez dubbed the rule “a return to neutrality.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

According to Gomez, the previous rule, passed during the administration of President Donald Trump, which required only “pecuniary factors” to be used in investment selection, had a “chilling effect” on the consideration of ESG factors. Gomez said the word “pecuniary” neither appears in the text of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the governing statute for both rules, nor does it occupy a “long-standing place in employee benefits law.”

Gomez briefly discussed one of the more nebulous provisions of the new rule when she said participant preferences for investments can be considered in menu selection on the grounds that it can increase plan participation and deferral rates, thereby increasing retirement security. She did not comment on how fiduciaries should determine adequate participant interest or how much economic gain could be compromised in exchange for increased participation, if any.

Eric Pitt, a climate finance consultant at Ceres who moderated the webinar, asked Gomez how a fiduciary should consider a hypothetical ESG large-cap stock fund for a plan menu: Should the fiduciary compare it to other similar ESG funds or the entire universe of large-cap funds? Gomez answered that there is no special treatment for ESG funds, and a fiduciary should look generally at the risk and return for any and all large-cap equity funds available, whether they use ESG considerations or not.

Despite the branding of the rule as neutral, Republicans in Congress have increased their organized opposition to the use of ESG considerations in retirement-plan investing.

Representative Patrick McHenry, R-North Carolina, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, announced the creation of a “Republican ESG working group” on Friday. The purpose of the working group is to “combat the threat to our capital markets posed by those on the far-left pushing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) proposals.”

The working group will be chaired by Representative Bill Huizenga, R-Michigan, and is staffed entirely by Republicans.

Last month, Representative Juan Vargas, D-California, and Representative Sean Casten, D-Illinois, started the Sustainable Investment Caucus.

Casten said in a statement that, “Given the significant growth of assets under management in funds that prioritize ESG factors, Congress has a duty to craft policies that provide investor protections and transparency of information to market participants.”

Members of the Sustainable Investment Caucus are all from the Democratic Party.

Tags: , ,

«