U. California’s Massive Cull: 100 PE Firms, All REITs, Coal, Oil Sands

The $98 billion fund has cleaned house, earning top-decile gains in the process.

The new investment team at the University of California (UC) has been very busy. 

It has sold off roughly 100 private equity investments—bringing total relationships down to 40—along with all REITs, coal and oil sands stocks, a third of its active equities strategies, and more than 6,000 individual securities.  

And the UC’s mission to streamline its $98.2 billion isn’t finished.

“We put the equities portfolio on a diet plan,” CIO Jagdeep Bachher—who is 15 months into the job—told his investment committee during a Wednesday meeting. “We went from 12,000 individual stocks to 5,700, and 60 active strategies down to 40. I could see it going down further.” 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“Organizations with small staffs will have hundreds of private equity relationships, and they cannot possibly manage them.” 

The overhaul aims to combat excessive diversification across the organization’s five funds: an endowment ($9 billion), defined benefit pension ($55 billion), defined contribution plan ($20 billion), and long-term and short-term working capital pools ($7.4 billion and $6.8 billion, respectively). 

Furthermore, UC’s team saw the heady asset prices of the past fiscal year as an opportunity to take profits amid mounting global risks. 

Liquidating $1.1 billion of real estate investment trusts (REITs), for example, earned the university system an extra $150 million relative to their current value.

Likewise for private equity, whose ultra-hot secondaries market allowed UC to sell off most of its investments without taking a haircut. 

“We rationalized the private equity portfolio over the last 30 months,” Bachher said, noting that the process was underway before his tenure began. “We had tons of investments sub-$5 million in size. This represents a systemic problem for the industry: Organizations with small staffs will have hundreds of private equity relationships, and they cannot possibly manage them. That can create over-diversification, where you’re earning market returns at a very high price point.” 

UC won’t be abandoning the asset class any time soon, however. Its $4.3 billion allocation outperformed both its benchmark and all other asset classes in the year ending June 30, 2015, with co-investments in particular driving returns. Potential partners, take note: Bachher predicted greater allocations in that style of private equity going forward. 

His most minor sell-off announcement (by dollar value) drew the most attention, from both the investment committee and external parties. UC has dropped all $200 million or so of its direct coal and oil sands holdings, following the team’s long-term view on commodity prices, structural demand, technology, and regulation. Economics ultimately delivered what an aggressive student-led divestment campaign hadn’t, although it is worth noting that UC explicitly factors sustainability into investment decisions. 

The UC endowment’s 7.2% returns in FY2015 ranked it 9th among peers, thus far. 

In comparison, UC’s largest reform—a total overhaul of the second-largest public defined contribution plan in America—arrived with little fanfare. COO Arthur Guimaraes took on the $20 billion defined plan and its 192 individual investment options, and cleared the deck. Members now have 16 to choose from, or default into custom target-date funds. And once again, the streamlining isn’t finished. According to Bachher, his team aims to implement automatic enrolment in the future. 

For the fiscal year as a whole, UC’s absolute net returns came in substantially lower than last year, but stacked up well next to peers. In 2014, bull markets had driven gains of 18.7% in the endowment and 17.4% for the pension—more than double the respective 7.2% and 4.5% earned this year.

These latest endowment returns placed UC 9th among peers reporting by September 8. The pension’s 4.5% topped all its counterparts except the State Teachers’ Retirement System of Ohio. Bachher predicted final peer-group results will place UC in the top quartile for endowments and top decile of public pensions. 

“This is the beginning of a new culture of the Office of the CIO,” Bachher concluded. “If you build a strong culture and set of values, and as an organization focus every day on those, the results will come.”

UC Pension Peers FY15

Related:U. California Hires Risk Guru Rick Bookstaber & UC Stacks Talent with Another CIO Hire

CalPERS, AIMCo Among Backers for ESG Infrastructure Benchmark

Some of the world's largest asset owners representing $1.5 trillion in total assets have backed a new standard for assessing sustainability within the asset class.

Major asset owners including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP) have backed a benchmark to measure sustainability of infrastructure investments.

“GRESB has an established and global track record in assessing and evaluating social and environmental factors, which will shed
more light on sustainability considerations for investors.”
The Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) Infrastructure will aim to help investors “collect and assess key environmental, social, and governance [ESG] factors, and related performance metrics.”

The coalition backing the benchmark includes CalPERS, Canada’s Albert Investment Management Corporation and OTPP, the Netherlands’ two largest pension managers APG and PGGM, ATP from Denmark, and asset managers Aviva Investors and Mirova. Together the group represents a total of $1.5 trillion.

“GRESB has an established and global track record in assessing and evaluating social and environmental factors, which will shed more light on sustainability considerations for investors,” Ted Eliopoulos, CalPERS’ CIO, said.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

GRESB already runs a sustainability benchmark for real estate. It was established in 2009 by Dutch investors—including APG and PGGM—and has the backing of a number of asset managers and owners, notably Norway’s $800 billion sovereign wealth fund.

CalPERS—currently invested in energy, power, water, and transportation sectors within its infrastructure portfolio—said it began exploring sustainability benchmarking with other investors in 2014. It has been involved in GRESB’s work in real estate since 2009.

“Infrastructure is a growing part of our portfolio,” Paul Mouchakkaa, CalPERS’ managing investment director of real assets, added. “This benchmark will give us a tool to integrate sustainable investment considerations into our real assets investment processes in line with our investment beliefs pertaining to the three forms of capital: finance, physical, and human.”

According to the pension plan, ESG factors are especially important considerations for infrastructure investments due to their long-term horizon, fixed location of physical assets, and societal impact.

APG’s Patrick Kanters, managing director of global real estate and infrastructure, added that the GRESB Infrastructure benchmark “provides insight, allows us to measure progress, and gives us the means to engage with our investee funds and companies.”

The initiative is expected to complete in early 2016.

Related: The Capitalists’ Guide to ESG & The ESG Takeover

«