Trump to Investigate the ‘Hidden Risks’ of Investing in Chinese Companies

The president pledges to ‘protect American investors’ by studying the operational behaviors and guiding principles of the Chinese companies that they invest in.

President Donald Trump has pledged to instruct his Presidential Working Group on Financial Markets to study the operational behaviors of Chinese-based companies in American markets, citing potentially abnormal behaviors that may be adverse to the interests of the American investment firms that allocate capital to them.

The announcements came in a package of repercussions directed toward the Chinese Communist Party in relation to its treatment of the coronavirus pandemic, which the president alleges was diligently protected from spreading to other parts of China, but not the rest of the world.

The administration’s group will be instructed to “study the differing practices of Chinese companies listed on the US financial markets, with the goal of protecting American investors,” Trump said. “Investment firms should not be subjecting their clients to the hidden and undue risks associated with financing Chinese companies that do not play by the same rules.”

Trump noted that American companies should be granted additional modicums of corporate transparency when dealing with Chinese companies.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Whether or not this investigation could be a prelude to decisionmaking related to American investments in Chinese companies, the president’s statements come soon after the White House and the US Department of Labor (DOL) instructed the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) from moving forward with previously approved decisions to invest in global public equity indices inclusive of Chinese state-owned companies.

The idea was originally propagated by congressional lawmakers who detested the merits of investing in Chinese companies, citing that engaging in such capital allocations in Chinese companies infringes on American national security interests.

“It is well-known that the Chinese government uses state-owned and state-directed enterprises to control production, compete in global markets, and serve the Chinese Communist Party’s military, political, and economic goals,” said Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Marco Rubio in a letter to FRTIB Chairman Michael Kennedy. “Many of these Chinese companies may soon receive investments directly from the paychecks of members of the US Armed Services and other federal government employees because of your decision.”

The index in question is the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI, which includes a selection of securities deviating between industry and region, including a significant allocation to China.

Related Stories:

Ray Dalio Says China Virus’ Market Impact Will Be Minimal

Senators Rebuke Federal Pension’s Criticisms of China Investment Ban

Federal Pension Balks at Bill Banning China Investments

Tags: , , , , ,

Why Did Bill Ackman Unload His Berkshire Stake?

A self-proclaimed acolyte of Warren Buffett, the hedgie isn’t loudly applauding the Oracle of Omaha like before.

Why has Bill Ackman dumped Warren Buffett? Specifically, the hedge fund impresario has sold all his holdings in Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate that investing guru Buffett runs.

Perhaps the answer is that Berkshire, which trails the market, lacks the get-up-and-go that Ackman wants to see in a stock. Perhaps Ackman doesn’t like what he sees in the Buffett portfolio, such as limited exposure to health stocks. Perhaps Buffett is simply too stodgy for the much-younger Ackman, who claims to adore the legendary investor.

In a conference call last week with his Pershing Square investors, Ackman did not explain why he was unloading his stake in Berkshire’s B shares, which investment service GuruFocus valued at $449 million. This constituted of 6.9% of Pershing’s $6.5 billion portfolio. Pershing enlarged its Berkshire position significantly just last year.

Ackman during the call labeled Berkshire a “strong investment,” although that seems like damning with faint praise, in light of his choosing to ditch the stock. Missing was Ackman’s one-time gushing over Berkshire. He only indicated that he wanted to deploy his capital into areas he considered having growth potential amid the ongoing cornavirus-influenced market. One such area is health care, which now is 14% of his assets.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Berkshire, aside from its operational companies in businesses ranging from insurance to railways, is essentially a giant mutual fund. Health care makes up just 2% of its investment assets. Buffett could not be reached for comment.

The odd part of all this is how much Ackman ordinarily says he worships Buffett. Indeed, the hedge operator once was dubbed “the baby Buffett,” perhaps because he said the older man had guided his investing career.  Ackman credited his Berkshire stock for Pershing’s 2019 turnaround, after four losing years when he pursued losing bets on Valeant Pharmaceuticals and a short-selling campaign against Herbalife Nutrition.

Ackman effusively crediting Berkshire holdings as a key ingredient of Pershing’s stellar 2019 turnaround sounded like hype: Buffett’s company stock did rise 15.4% for the year, but that was about half of what the S&P 500 delivered. Pershing itself was up 58.1%. Still, the Berkshire contribution helped to some small degree. 

Maybe, despite his one-time genuflecting toward Buffett, Ackman is disappointed in his Berkshire assets nowadays. Lately, Berkshire stock hasn’t exactly torn up the track. Both the A shares and the less expensive B shares are down around 19% this year, versus negative 5.8% for the S&P 500.

Buffett’s significant stakes in airlines, energy, and banks were no help: They have taken a hammering. He also is sitting on $137 billion in cash, and although he hasn’t done a major deal since 2016, he finds nothing very appealing to buy at the moment. That doesn’t send a note of forward momentum to investors.

Meanwhile, Pershing Square, which is publicly traded, is up a whopping 26% in 2020. As a hedgie, Ackman makes moves that are a lot more daring than those of Buffett, who is content to maintain his existing portfolio as is, with only occasional adjustments, such as his recent selling of his airline positions. Ackman’s portfolio turnover is much larger than Buffett’s. Indeed, there is a large age gap between the two men: Ackman is 54 and Buffett 89.

In March, Ackman sagely predicted that credit spreads would widen, so he bought $27 million in credit protection on corporate bonds globally, which paid off when fixed income markets panicked over the pandemic. Along with his divesting of Berkshire, he also unloaded positions in two other companies whose stock performances was less than exciting: Blackstone Group (flat this year) and Park Hotels & Resorts (off 60%).

Related Stories:

Ackman Scored $2.6 Billion on Bond Bets as Markets Sank

Ackman, Buying a Stake in Idol Buffett’s Firm, Finally Turns a 2019 Profit

Lock Down the US to Save It from Virus, Ackman Says

Tags: , , , , , ,

«