Towers Watson: Insurers Gear Up for Aggressive Investments

A survey from consultancy Towers Watson has shown that insurance companies are prepared to take more risks in investing, fueled by pressure from low interest rates.

(July 21, 2011) — A new survey by consulting firm Towers Watson has revealed that nearly half (46%) of North American insurers and reinsurers said they plan on being more aggressive in their respective investment strategies over the next year.

The firm’s Insurer Investment Practices survey — conducted among 38 insurers in April/May with general account assets invested of more than $1 billion — found that low interest rates represent the greatest investment challenge among insurance executives. Additionally, their investment goals focus primarily on liquidity and principal preservation.

“The survey reflected a large concern about inflation, yet, very little concern about foreign exchange,” Matt Stroud, Towers Watson’s head of strategy and portfolio construction, told aiCIO. “With inflation, the US dollar falls relative to everything else, so it’s interesting that foreign exchange wasn’t as apparent.” Looking ahead, Stroud asserted that he continues to see fixed-income as having a large role to play among insurance and pension funds in particular. “We also see alternatives as having a growing role among institutional investors seeking to broaden their portfolios, while they recognize that it’s not always easy within the regulatory framework.”

The consulting firm noted that while insurers are expected to focus on fixed-income investments, nearly 40% of respondents said they expect to increase their allocation relative to alternative investments and look to other high-risk, high-yield vehicles. Only 9% of respondents said they expect to be more conservative in their investment strategies.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

A total of 38% of respondents noted that low interest rates — which have hurt investment income while also increasing the expected cost of future liabilities — have become their greatest challenge. Still, more than half of the respondents (54%) listed the risk of rapidly rising interest rates as the second biggest challenge. Financial market volatility and inflation hedging (both 37%) and credit risk (31%) were also listed as challenges.

When questioned about the most important elements required for investment success, 37% said asset allocation, 26% adequate risk management, 14% good governance, 11% investment diversification, 8% portfolio construction process, and the rest cited costs.

“It’s meaningful that a substantial number of insurers expect to embrace a more aggressive investment strategy at a time when they are clearly worried about the economy and financial market volatility,” Towers Watson North America investment chief Christopher DeMeo said in a release.

A couple of other highlights of the survey, as outlined in the release, include:

  • Satisfaction levels with portfolios were roughly equivalent among respondents who outsourced and those who managed assets in house. Slightly higher percentages of respondents were satisfied with in-house management for principal preservation and total return.
  • Respondents tended to be more satisfied with their portfolio construction. They tended to be less satisfied with investment diversification. In terms of investment diversity, 71% of respondents said the most important factor is getting the best ideas into fixed income portfolios.


To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Mass Laborers’ Pension Fund Joins Growing List of News Corp Plaintiffs

The Massachusetts Laborers’ Pension and Annuity Funds has sued Rupert Murdoch and other News Corp directors over lack of oversight and a breach of fiduciary trust, adding to a growing list of investor lawsuits hitting News Corp in the midst of the phone hacking scandal.

(July 21, 2011) – The Massachusetts Laborers’ Pension and Annuity Funds (Mass. Labor) has filed a lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and the other directors of media giant News Corporation, adding to the list of shareholders who are suing the company for failure to act in the wake of the recent phone hacking scandal.

The Burlington, MA based Mass. Labor filed the suit in the Delaware Chancery Court on July 15. In the lawsuit, Mass. Labor accused Murdoch and the directors of “failure to take any action to investigate, control, and limit the fallout from the hacking scandal” that “caused the Company to lose billions of dollars in value,” according to the suit. The suit also alleges that Murdoch engaged in nepotistic business practices that bought companies run by family members for inflated prices and that the phone hacking scandal prevented News Corp from acquiring British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC, a move which would have helped increase the value of News Corp.

Mass. Labor joins a group of other pension funds seeking damages for News Corp’s break of its fiduciary agreement. All of the suits are being filed in Delaware because News Corp is chartered there.

On July 11, aiCIO reported that the original lawsuit filed in May 2011 had been supplemented with a suit whose plaintiffs included the New Orleans Employees’ Retirement System and the Central Laborers Pension Fund. The pension funds joined a trustee for several large investment funds in the suit.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The main claim of the plaintiffs in the suit is that Murdoch and the board of News Corp failed to intervene in response to the phone hacking allegations against the company. “These revelations should not have taken years to uncover and stop,” reads the amended complaint, which was filed on July 8, and was obtained by Bloomberg. “These revelations show a culture run amuck within News Corp. and a board that provides no effective review or oversight.”

According to the complaint, “Although the scandal first came to light in 2005…it is inconceivable that Murdoch and his fellow Board members would not have been aware of the illicit news gathering practices…And yet, the Board took no real action to investigate the allegations until July 7, 2011, when Murdoch selected two of his co-directors to deal with the imbroglio.”

The impetus for the amendments to the lawsuit was News Corp’s reported fall of $7 billion in market value since the scandal broke in early July.



<p><em>By Justin Mundt</em></p>

«