This Local Pennsylvania Police Pension Fund Is About to Run Out of Benefits. How Did That Happen?

The pension board is accused of opening the doors for pension spiking.

Pennsylvania pension funds are not having a good time right now. Pennsylvania’s Public School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) recently saw its CIO resign in November amid a scandal regarding the fund’s performance calculations. The Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System (Penn SERS) CIO also resigned in June for reasons that were not made immediately clear to the public.

But of all the struggling pension funds in Pennsylvania, the pension system in the city of Chester was shown to be the most underfunded municipal public pension plan in the entire state in 2019. And now, that situation has gone from bad to worse.

Reports say the pension will run out of money in less than four months, according to Philadelphia’s PBS station, WHYY. One of the primary reasons for this situation appears to date back to 2009, when the pension board adjusted the pension calculation procedure. These adjustments seem to have made it easier for some police officers to spike their pensions.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Under the 2009 change, police officer pensions in Chester were calculated using the salary of the final year of service, which may have encouraged some officers to work overtime as much as possible in their final year in order to inflate their pensions, according to the state’s appointed receiver. In October 2021, this rule was changed so that calculations will now be based upon the last three years of service. 

This one-year policy, combined with the practice of spiking among approximately 80 police officers, appears to be the cause of the pension system’s lack of funding. Officials are hoping to recoup some of the overpayments to retirees, and they are expecting future payments to be reduced significantly.  

The city of Chester has been dealing with major financial issues for over a decade. In July, it was put under receivership, which means the state of Pennsylvania appointed a manager to help control local finances to prevent bankruptcy. However, now even staff members at the office of the receiver say bankruptcy is an option.

“There’s a lot of significant action that we’re going to need to take in order to try and get the city back on its feet—and bankruptcy has to be on the table,” Vijay Kapoor, chief of staff to the receiver, told WHYY.

Related Stories:

What Public Pensions Can Learn From Puerto Rico’s Bankruptcy Crisis

California Pension Spiking Case Nears End in Court Showdown

CIO, Executive Director Resign From Embattled Pennsylvania PSERS

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Fed Isn’t Planning to Lift Rates High Enough, Says Summers

The central bank seems too timid to really dampen today’s high inflation, the former Treasury secretary warns.

Go big or go home—that’s what former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers advises the Federal Reserve. The central bank isn’t planning to escalate interest rates sufficiently to combat the current inflationary explosion, according to economist Summers.

“The Fed and the markets are still not recognizing what’s likely to be necessary,” Summers said on Bloomberg Television. “The market judgment and Fed’s judgment is that you can somehow contain this inflation without rates ever rising above 2.5% in terms of the fed funds rate.”

The Fed’s own projections put the federal funds rate—the key short-term benchmark, which the agency controls—at just below 1.0% by the end of this year, and 2.5% in 2025. That implies four quarter-point hikes in 2022, with the rate now just above zero.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Of course, that same forecast has inflation (using the Fed’s favorite gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures, or PCE, index) moderating starting in 2023: to 2.6%, and just above 2% after that. The most recent reading was 5.7%.

Summers’ remarks come just before the Wednesday release of the most widely known inflation metric, the consumer price index (CPI), up 6.8% in November, from 12 months before. Many expect the December CPI to top 7%.

Summers, a Harvard professor, did not specify how high he thinks the Fed should boost rates. Regardless of the degree of policy tightening, he said, the economy might react negatively.

The US economy will face a test as rates rise, he stated. While most indicators show continued robust economic growth, there’s always a fear that high rates will scuttle the expansion. In addition to boosting the fed funds rate, the Fed is reducing its bond buying, known as quantitative easing and aiming to lower longer-term rates, with March the target for total cessation.  

“What we’re going to find out is what the vulnerability of the economy is to rate increases,” Summers said. “It may be, as some argue, that because of greater levels of debt, because asset prices are substantially inflated, the economy is more vulnerable than usual to rate increases.”

He pointed to current strong job growth and wage gains as “consistent with accelerating inflation,” Still, these benefits are unlikely to persist, Summers warned. He added that “no path” to more muted inflation exists without a weaker labor market.

What’s more, stocks may be in for a rougher road ahead in an era of increasing rates, he contended. “The challenge for the Fed is that they’re likely to see some amount of fluctuation in financial markets and concern about growth before they see the declines in inflation that are substantial,” he said. “We’re heading into a very challenging period for the Fed in terms of executing a soft landing.”

Related Stories:

Dalio’s and Summers’ Dim View on Inflation, Markets, the Economy

Fading Inflation? Here Comes a Wage-Price Spiral, BCA Says

Why Inflation Might Not Be Temporary

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«

Close