The January Effect: A Good Time to Buy Small Caps?

Research from State Street Global Advisors, shared exclusively with aiCIO, has found the last two weeks in December are the optimum time to buy small caps.

(December 16, 2013) — Investors considering buying small cap stocks should do so in the next fortnight to achieve the best returns for the following year, according to data from State Street Global Advisors (SSgA).

Studying annualised returns from the past 90 years in the US, Marc Reinganum, senior managing director and quantitative strategist at SSgA, found that the end of the calendar year was the best time to invest in small cap stocks to achieve the highest returns.

Consistently over the 90-year period, small cap stocks’ performance in January dwarfed that of large cap stocks. They also did well in February when compared with large cap stocks—indeed, the first quarter showed outperformance from small caps when compared with large cap stocks.

This “January effect” was most pronounced in the period between 1960 and 1979, when small caps outperformed large caps by more than 1100 basis points. Even during the weakest January effect period—found between 1940 and 1959—the small market caps outperformed their larger peers by 675 basis points on average.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The trend was also evident in Europe. Reinganum assessed data from the MSCI Europe large and small cap indices between January 2000 and September 2013 and found small caps again outperformed large caps across the board.

The largest differential between the two groups’ returns was in January 2000, when small caps outperformed large caps by 900 basis points. Reinganum noted there was perhaps an extra incentive to invest in European small caps, as European equities are forecast to do well in 2014.

Many other economists have noticed this trend. Arthur Hill of the ChartWatchers blog, highlighted this week that the Russell 2000, an index for US small caps, was up almost 3% in the last four weeks compared with a 1.9% increase on the S&P 100.

As to what drives this phenomenon, Reinganum has a few theses. “One theory is that it’s because of individuals’ tax-loss selling,” he said.

“Small caps are more likely to be held by individuals, and for many December marks the end of their tax year. There could be tax incentives for disposing of stocks that have recently made some losses. We know that behaviourally, these investors tend to realise their losses at the end of the year.”

Reinganum also cited mutual funds’ “window dressing” by dropping underperforming small cap stocks in December, which led to a depression in small cap stocks.

Thirdly, the end of the calendar year represents a period of information uncertainty, as many companies put out fewer statements of public information in the run up to their annual statements. This uncertainty can lead to price depressions, Reinganum said.

On the potential impact of future policy decisions, such as rising interest rates, Reinganum said he felt a rising rates market wouldn’t adversely affect small caps compared to large cap stocks.

“While I cannot comment about all potential policy changes and their impact, early this year we did a study on the impacts of rising interest rates on the relative performance of small cap versus large cap companies,” he said,

“From 1979-2012, the evidence clearly suggested that in a rising interest environment, small cap stocks outperformed large cap stocks on average and this relationship held in two-thirds of the occasions in which we measured rising rates.”

In addition, aiCIO asked for data on the performance of small cap stocks during the taper tantrum period of May and June 2013, when stocks, commodities, and bonds all fell. During this period, small cap stocks outperformed large cap stocks by about 250 basis points in the US and by about 210 basis point in Europe.

“For most of our clients, we are not recommending a position that tries to arbitrage the returns between small cap and large cap stocks,” Reinganum said. “However, for clients that intend to allocate to small cap stocks because of their longer term return and risk profiles, history suggests that the next several months represent a particularly opportune entry point.”

Not everyone is convinced by the January effect however. Hamish Galpin, head of small and mid-sized caps at Hermes Fund Managers, told aiCIO that while he often saw some of the better quality stocks sold off at the end of the year in favour of more “racy stocks”, the performance of the better quality ones tended to be recovered within three to four months, prompting many investors to return.

On the impact of rate rises on the sector, Galpin said he was not overly concerned about whether an interest rate increase could result in a number of small cap zombie companies collapsing—a name given to companies which are only surviving thanks to the low rate environment—adding there was likely to be more zombies hiding in the large cap sector.

“Small caps are still pretty big corporations, and generally they’ve restructured effectively since the start of the financial crisis,” Galpin said. “Looking at MSCI indices and the gearing figures, you can see that large caps are more highly geared than small caps.

“Although there will definitely be pockets of gearing in the sector, it’s likely to be in the usual suspects, such as property and pub companies. An active manager will be able to avoid these.”

Related Content: International Small-Caps Re-emerge as a Shiny New Asset Class, Alternative Indices Strategies Rise, But Are Investors Buying it? and Are Institutional Investors Fueling Stock Market Liquidity?

Danish Pensions Dump UNPRI over Governance Concerns

Scandinavia’s largest investors fear the UN’s sustainable investment body has governance problems of its own.

(December 13, 2013) — Six of the largest European pension funds have dumped the United Nations-backed Principles of Responsible Investment (PRI), citing continued fruitless attempts at improving the organisation’s overall structure.

The national fund ATP, Industriens Pension, PensionDanmark, PFA Pension, PKA, and Sampension, released a joint statement this morning saying they would continue to invest using the principles, but would “remain outside the organisation until it again lives up to basic requirements for good corporate governance—including restoring membership democracy in the organisation”.

The PRI was established to embed six basic environmental, social, and governance principles in investment decisions. Some of the world’s largest investors have signed up to the principles, including pension and sovereign wealth funds, along with large asset managers and insurance companies.

The principles were launched by a group of international investors with the support of the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative and the Global Compact in 2006.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The Danish funds said today: “The UN-backed PRI have an important role to play in promoting responsible investment—including emphasising the importance of good governance in companies around the world. We have, nonetheless, over a sustained period of time observed with concern that the governance of the PRI organisation does not live up to the basic standards we as investors would expect of the companies in which we invest. Despite numerous attempts to improve the conditions within PRI, we must, unfortunately, acknowledge that these attempts have not been successful.”

This week, ING Investment Management said western Europeans were the most concerned of all institutional investors about incorporating ESG issues into their portfolios. Some 86% responded to the asset manager’s survey to say it was an important consideration when making decisions.

The Danish funds did not shut the door on the organisation completely. “Should the PRI organisation at a later stage endeavour to substantiate that the governance of the organisation has improved to a satisfactory level, we will as individual investors give serious thought to re-entering the organisation,” the statement added.

“The PRI is deeply disappointed that this has occurred,” said PRI Managing Director, Fiona Reynolds. “At our annual Signatory General Meeting in Cape Town in September, the PRI committed to undertake a review of its governance. The Council’s Governance committee has already begun to define the scope of this review, which will be led by a new Council Chair expected to be appointed in early 2014.

Reynolds said accountability and transparency were fundamental to all of the PRI’s work and it have recently launched a new mandatory public Reporting Framework for its 1,200 signatories to ensure both they and the PRI itself continued to lead by example.

“We had previously arranged to meet with our Danish signatories in Copenhagen on  January 13 and we plan to continue with this meeting and hope all of the funds concerned attend,” she added. “Given the important work of the Danish pension funds in responsible investment, we hope that the funds concerned will reconsider their decision at some point in the near future.”

Related content: CIO Profile: Why Zurich wants to Lead the Way on Impact Investing & Blood & Gore: Invest for Climate Change, or Pay the Price Later  

«