The Best Debt: Corporate DB Plans

New research finds that compared to regular corporate debt, pension obligations are less expensive to carry and boost real investment. 

(September 26, 2012) – Like fat, not all debt is created equal, according to Söhnke Bartram of Warwick Business School. 

Defined benefit (DB) obligations would be the olive oil of the group: still hazardous in excessive quantities, but vastly superior to regular debt. 

In a research paper titled “Post-Retirement Benefit Plans, Leverage, and Real Investment,” Bartram investigated the role of pension and retiree health benefit plans on corporate capital structure and real investment. Bartram is a finance professor and, until last year, was the head of State Street’s quantitative analysis division in London. 

He based his analysis on a data set comprising the financials of more than 33,000 publicly traded non-financial firms from 50 countries between 2002 and 2009. 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

From this sample, Bertram found DB obligations have a negative effect on corporations’ capital expenditures. Furthermore, and perhaps surprisingly, pensions have a positive effect on research and development expenses, which he uses as a proxy for real investment. The effect, he writes, “is not only statistically significant, but also economically sizable.” 

For instance, a corporation with pension obligations valued at 10.5% of the firm’s total assets would enjoy, on average, 5% less capital expenditures and 12.3% more research and development than a similar corporation without a DB plan. 

“To the extent that larger post-retirement obligations entail more flexibility on the financing side, it induces more flexibility and optionality on the asset side, by creating more real options via R&D and by executing fewer options via capital expenditures,” Bertram writes. “Consequently, post-retirement plans are important not just for the capital structure, but also for the real operations of a company.” 

His analysis also revealed that substitution between DB obligations and regular forms of corporate debt by no means operates in a one-to-one ratio. In other words, consuming two tablespoons of olive oil can’t be counted as saving two tablespoons of butter.

Read Bertram’s full paper here

«