The Benchmark Causing Headaches for High Yield Investors

Indexes focused on downgraded emerging market corporates could cause high yield bond investors problems, a manager has warned.

Investors in high yield fixed income could face added complexity when selecting funds and benchmarks following a recent index review, a fund manager has warned.

Andrew Wilmont, European high yield portfolio manager at Neuberger Berman, said investors could see “elevated risk” in some markets for “many months” as bond issuers and buyers adapt to a new set of indexes to be launched later this year by Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BoAML).

“Portfolio managers and their clients have a big decision to make regarding their choice of index.” —Andrew Wilmont, Neuberger BermanBoAML updated its high yield indexes at the end of last month, introducing a new category that only contains issuers “with a developed markets country of risk”.

The decision followed downgrades of a number of large issuers based in emerging markets, such as Brazilian oil and gas giant Petrobras and Russian gas company Gazprom. The companies were subsequently moved from investment grade to high yield indexes, where the size of their debt in circulation meant they dominated the benchmarks.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

BoAML’s new indexes mean investors can chose global high yield benchmarks in which emerging market companies do not feature, but they are not forced to exclude emerging market securities. BoAML previously opted to exclude Latin American companies from US high yield indexes in 2010 and 2011.

However, Neuberger Berman’s Wilmont said the move still created a “major new headache” for investors.

“While not all of the world’s BoAML-benchmarked high yield money is about to dump emerging market bonds, at least some of it will likely migrate to the new indexes,” Wilmont said. “Portfolio managers and their clients have a big decision to make regarding their choice of index.”

He said the benchmarks, while initially similar in construction, could diverge “possibly quite rapidly”, as the emerging market names in the legacy indexes make up a large proportion of issuance and create additional volatility. He cited the example of Petrobras, which he said was “about to try to auction off its offshore oilfields”, while Russian companies are focused on buying back bonds.

“Before this compromise, many portfolio managers expected to face an uncomfortable few weeks of elevated risk between the announcement that emerging markets would be excluded from BoAML’s high yield indexes and the actual implementation in October,” Wilmont said. “Now, having been given a choice over which benchmark to use, they arguably face similar uncertainty for many months more.

Related: What Price Yield? Fund Managers ‘Taking Excessive Risk’

«