Survey: With US Equities Unpopular, Corporate Bonds and Emerging Markets Hot

A recent survey by Bank of America Merrill Lynch shows that 30% of large pension plans, endowments, and foundations are reducing their exposure to much-maligned U.S. equities, choosing instead to enter corporate bonds and emerging markets.

(November 19, 2009) – A new report is claiming that 30% of large United States pension funds, endowments, and foundations are planning to increase their exposure to highly graded corporate bonds in 2010.


According to the study, conducted for Bank of America Merrill Lynch in September and October, only 16% of surveyed funds plan to reduce their exposure to such investment vehicles. Forty-eight percent are planning no changes in such allocations, while 6% are undecided. With just six weeks left in the year, corporate bonds have been some of the most stellar performers among any asset, with a 19.3% growth, the highest since 1995—possibly a result of such large funds moving into the asset class following severe equity losses in 2008.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.


In conjunction with the move toward corporate bonds, the survey found a decreased willingness to invest in U.S. equities. Thirty-nine percent of the funds surveyed disclosed plans to reduce their exposure to this asset class, which, despite a solid 2009, has harmed portfolios worldwide since the 2008 downturn. In turn, 42% of those polled expressed a willingness to increase their exposure to emerging market equities.


This projected shift toward high-grade corporate bonds could be a boon for the asset class. With more than $6.2 trillion in assets managed by such funds in America, even small allocation changes can raise or lower the demand for certain assets considerably.


The survey respondents included 111 funds, with a total of more than $1 trillion in assets under management.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

Facing Legal Pressure, State Street Ups Defense Reserves

 

Following on the news that CalPERS knew of forex overcharges as early as 2003, State Street has upped its battle fund in preparation for a drawn-out legal battle regarding this and other claims.

 

(November 12, 2009) – State Street, under assault for allegedly overcharging some foreign exchange clients and exposing others to sub-prime mortgages, has added millions to its legal defense fund.

 


The fund, established in 2007 to defend against claims that the bank had exposed clients to subprime mortgages through its fixed-income investment strategies, has received $250 million. The fund started with $618 million, but had since been drawn down to just $193 million. The funds will be used partially to settle a $90 million claim by fixed-income participants who were unwittingly exposed to the illiquidity of subprime markets. The excess funds will be used for any potential civil suit brought by regulators, according to Reuters.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

 


State Street is also on the defensive about potential overcharges for foreign exchange trades for two California pension giants. Recent reports suggest that the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) knew of such overcharges as early as 2003. The Wall Street Journal, refusing to cite sources, has reported that consultants advised the fund that they were overpaying for such services.

 


State Street is denying all charges.

 



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

«