Survey: Pension Deficits for One in 10 FTSE Firms

The total disclosed pension liabilities of FTSE-100 firms has skyrocketed to £410 billion from £382 billion in the past 12 months.

(May 21, 2010) — Nearly one in 10 blue-chip FTSE-100 companies face looming pension scheme deficits that threaten the future of the business, a new survey finds.

According to the survey by Pension Capital Strategies in association with investment bank group JP Morgan Cazenove, only five FTSE-100 pension funds are in surplus with nine of Britain’s biggest listed companies facing pension liabilities greater than their stock market value, representing a “material risk” to its business.

Those nine companies include BAe Systems, Royal Bank of Scotland and insurance group RSA. British Airways and BT are in the biggest pension holes as they confront liabilities that are more than three times their equity market value.

The report titled “FTSE-100 and Their Pension Disclosures” predicts that final salary pension schemes at top companies could end within three years. And while total service cost — the cost of providing the current year’s pension obligations — continues to drop as the number of workers who are earning final salary benefits declines, final salary pensions in the private sector could be obsolete within six years.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Additionally, the survey discovered that pension funds did not take advantage of soaring equity markets in the year to the end of March because schemes have continued to switch their investments into bonds as employers strive to cut the investment risks in their pension schemes. While the average pension scheme allocated 34% to bonds three years ago, that percentage has now risen to 50%.

“Companies and trustees are continuing to switch pension assets out of equities into bonds despite the recent massive rally in equity markets. Liberty International is the latest company to report a big switch, increasing their bond allocations by 45%,” the report said. “Moreover, company disclosures reveal little of the extensive activity there has been by a number of companies to reduce mismatching risk by LDI (liability-driven investment) strategies, which frequently make use of derivatives and other financial instruments.”

Despite of mounting profit and cash flow pressures among pensions, the study also revealed there has been a significant rise in deficit funding. Last year, deficit funding totaled £11.1 billion, up from £4.4 billion the previous year, an increase of more than 150%. Nevertheless, total deficit of FTSE-100 companies stands at £66 billion, which has not changed in the past year.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Report: Growing Number of Consultants Offer Performance Measurement

Global custodians remain the largest vendors of performance measurement services to institutional investors, yet more and more investment management consultants are able to provide the same services.

(May 19, 2010) — A new report from financial market researcher Finadium reveals that while global custodians remain the largest vendors of performance measurement services to institutional investors, “advances in technology” have allowed consultants to compete more effectively with custody banks in reporting performance results for their clients.

Performance measurement is a critical part of the investment management process for institutions and asset managers, the report said. With institutional clients demanding increased granularity and transparency across asset classes, fueled partly by the passage of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (”ERISA”) in 1974 that compelled plans to disclose liabilities and funded status, a complete view of analytics, attribution, and risk exposures has become an essential part of performance reporting. Growing interest in outsourced arrangements has resulted in an array of vendors, including custodians, consultants, independent technology firms, spin-offs of asset managers and a variety of combinations of these firms.

“To meet client demand, consulting firms either developed performance capabilities internally or sought a performance vendor solution,” wrote co-authors Josh Galper, Finandium’s managing principal, and James McCann, senior consultant, in “The State of Performance Measurement for Institutions and Asset Managers.”

To compile the study, Galper and McCann targeted the investment performance capabilities of the 40 largest 150 US consulting firms overseeing about $14 trillion or more than 75% of the assets of 8,700 U.S. institutional investors. The study found that while 55% of the top 40 consultants use internally developed and maintained performance measurement processes, 45% use services from outside providers.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

According to the Finadium report, InvestorForce is the most popular of performance measurement outsourcers based on assets under advisement. InvestorForce provides services to five of the 10 largest investment consultants based on assets under advisory.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«