Steve Schwarzman Knocks Beijing, as Business Chiefs Grow Leery on Trade Tiff

The Blackstone head, on old China hand, argues that the challenge to Chinese conduct is justified.

Chinese trade practices are hurting the US, so the White House should soldier on with its trade war, says Blackstone Group chief Steve Schwarzman. His criticism of China comes at a time that his fellow business titans are growing chary about the Washington-Beijing clash.

Schwarzman makes the case that the conflict is worthwhile because otherwise the West will continue to be victimized. That’s essentially the Trump administration line, although Schwarzman delivers it in a less strident manner than the president.

A confidante of President Donald Trump, Schwarzman has been involved in the trade talks now set to resume again, as a low-key, unofficial liaison. In a similar capacity, he also has helped renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico.

During a CNBC appearance Tuesday, he argued that China needs to change its business and trade methods, such as its filching US and other Western nations’ intellectual property. And China’s unfair practices have damaged ordinary people across America, he went on, declaring that “the developed world has suffered. We’ve got 40% of our people who are really hurting in this country.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“That leads the developed world to say to China: ‘We’ve got to rebalance this. It’s working for you. It’s not working for us,’” he said.

Right now, the trade war has the reluctant asset of the US population, polling shows. A recent Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll, for instance, finds that 63% of registered voters say tariffs on Chinese goods harm the US more than China.  Nevertheless, 67% also say it’s necessary to confront China over unfair trade practices.

At the same time, business leaders are starting to question Trump’s aggressive stance toward Beijing. For a long time, many were quiet about the issue, but as the conflict has dragged on, important skeptics among the C-suite set have become more vocal.

When the president jacked up tariffs on a range of Chinese items this month, Joshua Bolten, head of the Business Roundtable, an organization representing the largest companies, warned that the step might “disrupt trade and commerce in a way that would cause huge damage—not just to the Chinese economy, but to the global economy and the US economy.”

Meanwhile, the chief of the National Association of Manufacturers, Jay Timmons, tweeted that “America’s manufacturing workers will bear the brunt of these retaliatory tariffs, which will make it even harder to sell the products they make to customers in China.”

In his new book, Schwarzman freely recounts his efforts to bring the two sides together. The memoir-cum-career-advice volume, called What It Takes: Lessons in the Pursuit of Excellence, describes how to he took eight trips to China in 2018, meeting with top Chinese officials, including President Xi Jinping.

His involvement in China is long and deep. He founded the Schwarzman Scholars program at Tsinghua University in Beijing. China’s sovereign wealth fund made a $3 billion investment in Blackstone in 2007, right before its initial public offering. The fund, which had a 10% stake in Blackstone, sold its interest last year. Blackstone has made a number of large real estate transactions in China.

So in a way, Schwarzman is well-positioned to be the bridge between the business world and the president. Whether he’ll be able to do that with China is another question.

Related Stories:

Despite Trump Gesture, the Trade War Will Worsen, BofA Warns

Schwarzman: This is Why Blackstone is Successful

Why Long-Vilified Private Equity Does So Well

Tags: , , , ,

Japan GPIF’s ESG Portfolio Outperforms Market

Fund reports that four out of five ESG investments outperformed their benchmarks.

Japan’s $1.47 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) reported that four out five ESG indices selected by the fund outperformed their parent indices and market averages over the past two years.

The fund has approximately ¥3.5 trillion ($32.4 billion) in assets under management tracking ESG indices. The ESG indices selected by the fund include the MSCI Japan ESG Select Leaders Index, the MSCI Japan Empowering Women Index, and the FTSE Blossom Japan Index. The indices are mainly composed of medium and large-cap stocks.

The fund said in its most recent ESG report that market conditions led the MSCI Japan ESG Select Leaders Index, and the MSCI Japan Empowering Women Index to underperform the Tokyo Stock Price Index (TOPIX) over one year beginning April 2017. However, they outperformed the benchmark over two years beginning on the same date.

According to the report, performance of ESG indices can be significantly affected by factors unrelated to ESG, such as the so-called small cap effect, in which small cap stocks tend to outperform larger ones over the long-term.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The number of stocks included in the MSCI Japan ESG Select Leaders Index rose to 700 from 500 as coverage of ESG evaluation expanded for the parent index in December 2018.

“As the scope of ESG scoring expands to small cap stocks,” said the report, “ESG index performance will be able to benefit more from the small cap effect and smaller companies will have an incentive to improve their ESG scores.”

The fund measures the ESG score of its equity portfolio by using ESG ratings by FTSE and MSCI, and calculating the weighted average ESG scores for each according to the market capitalization weight of each issue in GPIF’s portfolio. The GPIF then compares these scores to those for the whole market by calculating the ESG scores of market representative indices, using TOPIX for domestic equities and the MSCI ACWI (excluding Japan) for foreign equities.

According to GPIF, results showed that the fund’s equity portfolio’s ESG score for both the FTSE and the MSCI continued to improve for domestic and foreign equities. The results also showed that there was little difference between the ESG scores of the index portfolios and those of the GPIF holdings for both domestic and foreign equities for the FTSE and MSCI.

“These results were most likely mainly due to the fact that GPIF’s assets are largely allocated to passive investment funds, whose performance tracks the performance of their benchmarks,” the report said.

Because large companies tend to perform better in ESG information disclosure they receive higher ESG scores. As a result, a market cap-weighted average ESG score is likely to be higher than a simple average. For example, FTSE’s market cap-weighted average ESG score for Japan’s TOPIX stock benchmark is 2.61, while the simple average ESG score for domestic equities is 2.18. The difference in values is mainly attributed to the difference between weighted average and simple average calculation methods.

Although GPIF calculated the country-level average ESG score for all surveyed companies, ESG scores vary widely among companies within the same country. Japanese companies rank at the top among major countries in terms of the percentage of companies contacting MSCI over the course of the index provider’s ESG scoring process, which indicates an increased interest among these companies with respect to ESG scores. They are expected to further improve their handling of ESG issues and information disclosure going forward, which will help elevate their ESG scores even higher, said the fund.

Related Stories:

PLSA Issues ESG Compliance Guide for UK Pensions

Myth-Busting ESG Investing Concerns: It’s Not Just for the Tree Huggers

ESG Matters (Part 1): Diversity Measures

Tags: , , , ,

«