Steelworkers Ratify Pension Deal with ArcelorMittal

United Steelworkers (USW) at steel and mining company ArcelorMittal’s operations in Fermont and Port-Cartier, Quebec, have agreed to a four year collective agreement with the company that includes maintaining and improving the employees’ defined benefit pension plan.

The deal averts a strike, which the 2,000-worker strong union overwhelmingly voted for last week after it rejected a contract offer from the company that required a two-tier pension concession by the employees. However, ArcelorMittal dropped its two-tier pension demand, and a tentative deal was then agreed upon.

Other issues of contention that had separated the two sides included union demands that contracted-out positions be returned as unionized jobs, and the resolution of discrepancies in working conditions and standards between workers at ArcelorMittal’s Mont-Wright mine and its Fire Lake mine.

The agreement includes annual wage increases ranging from 2.2% to 3%, an increase in basic pension benefits, and restrictions on subcontracting that will bring back unionized jobs. Improvements will also be made to health benefit plans, and to non-monetary clauses. Office employees will return to a 40-hour work week, which reversed a reduction in hours last year.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

“It’s an excellent contract,” said Nicolas Lapierre, Steelworkers Area Coordinator for Quebec’s North Shore region in a statement. “Thanks to the mobilization and determination of our members, they have ensured younger workers will benefit from the same pension plan that previous generations fought for and, in fact, they have improved the plan for all current and retired workers.”

The deal also provides ArcelorMittal’s Fire Lake Mine workers with contract parity with their counterparts at the company’s MontWright mine. Previously, the wage gap between workers at the two mines was as high as $8 an hour.

“There are clear improvements and no concessions,” said Lapierre. “This was made possible by very strong mobilizing and solidarity on the workers’ part.”

By Michael Katz

Tags: Canada, Pension, Quebec, steelworkers, strikes

The board of the San Diego Municipal Employees Association (MEA) has voted to seek a review from the state Supreme Court to overturn a Court of Appeals ruling that upheld pension cutbacks.

MEA’s board of directors voted unanimously to appeal to the California Supreme Court last month’s Proposition B ruling by the Fourth District Court of Appeals. The board said that if left unchallenged, the court decision would not only prevent San Diego city employees hired on or after July 20, 2012, from being put back into a defined benefit pension system, but it could also undermine future bargaining.

Proposition B replaced guaranteed defined-benefit pensions with 401(k)-style defined contribution retirement plans for all new city employees, except police officers.

The appellate court ruling in April overturned a 2015 state labor board ruling that found that the pension cutbacks were illegal because of then-Mayor Jerry Sanders’ involvement in the initiative that made the changes.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

MEA alleged that the city was required to meet and confer with employees before putting Proposition B on the ballot in 2012. Mayor Sanders and the city’s attorney argued that they were acting as “private citizens” and therefore did not have to comply with the meet and confer requirement. An administrative law judge ruled in 2013 against the “private citizen” designation, which the MEA called a ruse.

“Though he characterized his initiative campaign as the activity of a private citizen, the mayor pursued pension reform in his capacity as an elected official, and could not disown his statutory obligation,” the judge said in his ruling.

The union, which represents about 4,000 city workers, said that the process for pursuing a review with the California Supreme Court will take several months, and that a decision on whether or not the court will even hear the appeal won’t come until late summer.

“This decision condones the opt-out scheme which Mayor Sanders and his allies adopted – and in which the City Council became complicit – to defeat rights guaranteed to all public employees under California’s statewide collective bargaining law, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA),” said the MEA in a statement after the April appellate court ruling. “This decision is a disheartening setback in MEA’s righteous battle to gain the City’s compliance with this important statewide bargaining law.”

The MEA also said that if the ruling is not overturned, it will make it hard for the city to hire quality employees because many will take jobs with other cities that still offer defined benefit pensions.

If the California Supreme Court sides with the MEA and overturns the appellate court decision, it could mean that the city of San Diego will have to shell out millions of dollars to create retroactive pensions for more than 3,000 workers hired since 2012.

Tags: appeals, MEA, Municipal Employees, San Diego