SSgA Study: Australian Institutional Investors to Up ETFs

A report by State Street Global Advisors (SSgA) shows that exchange-traded funds (ETFs) will play a larger role among Australian superannuation funds.

(May 31, 2011) — Following Cooper Review recommendations, Australian institutional investors are expected to increase their use of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), says State Street Global Advisors (SSgA).

According to SSgA, ETFs — which offer specific market access — should flourish among superannuation funds amid the Cooper review’s recommendations emphasizing low-cost-for-value investment outcomes.

A recent study by Connecticut-based Greenwich Associates provides further evidence in support of the investment vehicle on a global basis, noting that while ETFs encompass a fraction of institutional investor portfolios, a burgeoning number of institutions plan to increase their use of these investing instruments in the future. “Perhaps even more telling than those findings is the fact that not a single asset manager reported plans to cut ETF allocations in the coming two years, and less than one in 10 institutional funds plan to reduce allocations to ETFs in that period,” says Greenwich Associates consultant Andrew McCollum.

According to the firm, nearly one-half of the asset management firms and one-third of the institutional funds taking part in the study of current institutional ETF users plan to increase the share of portfolio assets that they invest in ETFs over the next two years.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Click here to see the new GC Australia — a sister publication to aiCIO — that focuses on the Australian superannuation and alternative fund industry, from a securities services perspective.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Citi Urges Dismissal of $1.3 Billion Lehman Suit

Citigroup is aiming to dismiss efforts by Lehman Brothers to recover $1 billion in collateral that the investment bank was forced to post when it was approaching bankruptcy in 2008, Bloomberg is reporting.

(May 30, 2011) — Citigroup, the third largest US bank by assets, has asked a judge to dismiss a $1.3 billion Lehman Brothers lawsuit.

The lawsuit was brought by a trustee overseeing the liquidation of Lehman.

According to a court filing obtained by Bloomberg, Citigroup lent Lehman’s brokerage more than $15 billion after Lehman went bankrupt in September 2008. In a March lawsuit, trustee James Giddens demanded that Citigroup return more than $1.3 billion in cash and other assets that he said the bank seized or froze in violation of bankruptcy law, in order to cut its risk during the financial crisis. Specifically, Giddens asserted that Citibank seized $1 billion that the brokerage pledged to it for settling foreign exchange trades, and froze another $300 million of the brokerage’s assets around the world, the news service reported.

Citigroup has claimed that the trustee’s efforts to recoup most of the money “fail on multiple independent grounds” of the law. Also according to Citigroup, Lehman’s collapse led to $1.26 billion in unpaid expenses related to FX clearing.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Lehman’s claim against Citigroup follows efforts by JPMorgan Chase & Co’s earlier this month, when it urged a bankruptcy court to throw out Lehman’s claim demanding that it pay $8.6 billion in cash taken as collateral in the weeks before Lehman imploded in September 2008.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«