Small Hedge Funds Get Dating Service

An introduction network to link investor capital with new hedge funds has been created in Europe.

(May 23, 2012)  —  A hedge fund seeding firm has created a forum for start-up funds to tap institutional investors who have been increasingly favouring larger players in the sector.

The IMQ Capital Introduction Network has been created by IMQubator, a platform that directs start-up capital to fledgling hedge funds. Funding of €250 million for that initial project was injected by Dutch pension investor APG in 2009.

Jeroen Tielman, CEO and Founder of IMQubator, said: “In introducing the global institutional industry to the new generation of hedge funds, IMQ has taken the inventive step of creating a proprietary, online intermediary network, whereby chosen agents can promote our underlying managers to their respective investor contacts.”

The platform will ‘host’ new funds and connect them with potential institutional investors through a network of advisers.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Tielman said the structure of the network would ensure streamlining and transparency throughout the process and a number of “best-of-breed agents” were already on board.

Although inflows have strengthened to the hedge fund sector, small companies have struggled since the financial crisis, with new investor money mainly heading to larger firms.

In the first quarter of this year $18.3 billion was allocated to firms managing over $5 billion while firms managing less than $5 billion saw almost a combined $2 billion in outflows, Hedge Fund Review said last month.

The IMQ Capital Introduction Network will also act as a physical office for these new firms. Fund managers will share headquarters in Amsterdam, interact and be monitored by the ‘incubator’ and their peers.

Why Wyoming's Pension System Lost Faith in Alpha

Jeffrey Straayer, a Senior Investment Officer at the $6.5 billion Wyoming Retirement System (WRS), says that the scheme's embrace of MSCI's risk-weighted index reflects an overall skepticism of active management and a propensity toward passive.

(May 23, 2012) — The $6.5 billion Wyoming Retirement System has lost faith in alpha — here’s why.

Its recent embrace of MSCI’s global ACWI Risk Weighted Index in December 2011 reflects the growing reality that 1. success in active management is increasingly rare, and 2. risk-adjusted returns are a growing focus for public schemes worldwide, according to Jeffrey Straayer, a senior investment officer at WRS.

The pension plan’s final strategic allocation after partnering with the index provider was 70% of the total equity allocation assigned to passive managers, and the other 30% mandated to active long-only managers and alpha strategies, according to a newly released paper by MSCI’s Raman Aylur Subramanian published this month.

“We wanted to do this all on a passive basis, since a lot of active managers do the same thing through active management but with much higher fees,” Straayer said, explaining the scheme’s use of MSCI risk premia mandates in its strategic allocation.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“If we ascertain that opportunities in the market for true alpha are rare, we’ll allocate to the high end of our systematic passive approach, but always with the ability to allocate more to active strategies should markets present the opportunity. We’re saying that in general it’s very hard to find alpha, and that we can capture different risk premia passively.”

The goal with the equity portfolio transition toward increasingly passive management was to lower volatility and correlations, Straayer said, improving risk-adjusted returns while decreasing fees. MSCI’s global risk-weighted index that overweights lower volatility equities, often defensive sectors, and underweights more volatile, often cyclical, sectors, was thus increasingly appealing.

Straayer described the transition to the MSCI mandate as one part of a three-level cake of passive beta, active alpha, and risk-adjusted Sharpe Ratio ratio-focused strategies. “The way we wanted to do passive was different compared to what we had previously been doing,” he said. The scheme introduced unique systematic risk premiums into its passive allocation through premium in size, with smaller-cap companies traditionally outperforming, value, with stocks with lower valuations traditionally outperforming, and low-volatility investments.

Describing the specifics of WRS’ final strategic allocation, the paper by MSCI’s Subramanian continued: “This allocation provided a strategic overweight of approximately 10% to global small caps (size risk premium) in addition to capturing the core global equity risk premium. They also elected to make two strategic allocations—each of 15%—to portfolios that passively tracked the MSCI ACWI Value Weighted and MSCI ACWI Risk Weighted Indices. The two portfolios aimed to capture the value and low volatility risk premia, respectively. By design, these two portfolios were tilted towards lower capitalization stocks, which led to approximately equal allocations to the size, value and low volatility risk premia in the overall strategic equity allocation.”

Following WRS’s decision to seek MSCI’s mandate, Taiwan Labor Pension Fund (LPF), the largest pension plan in Taiwan with assets totaling over $43 billion, chose MSCI in May as the benchmark provider for its new passively managed Global Minimum Volatility Equity Indexation portfolios totaling $1.5 billion.

Will other passive mandates such as MSCI’s become more commonplace as the reality sinks in among schemes that skill in active management may be similar to a diamond in the rough? Straayer noted that other schemes may follow in this Wyoming scheme’s footsteps as it becomes increasingly difficult to add active alpha over the long-term. “We continue to question the traditional sources of alpha,” Straayer said.

Related article: What Keeps Wyoming’s Pension CIO Up at Night?

«