Skin In the Game, No Longer

A list of six funds whose managers have pulled their entire $1M+ personal investments.

The gold standard—or some would say, baseline—for firm-client alignment of interest is a manager’s personal assets invested in the fund they run. 

And if it ever was the case, it is no longer universal, according to Morningstar. 

The firm’s Director of Manager Research Russel Kinnel dug up data from regulatory and marketing filings to find managers whose personal allocation had dropped from at least $1 million to zero.  

PIMCO and Wells Fargo led the pack with two funds each in this situation. 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“I’d feel better if his co-managers showed more enthusiasm for these funds.” —Russel Kinnel, MorningstarAt the Newport Beach bond giant, Managing Director Curtis Mewbourne no longer has any allocations to two funds under his direction, Kinnel said: PIMCO Floating Income and PIMCO Diversified Income. Reached by CIO, the firm did not provide comment by press time. 

Wells Fargo Managing Director Charles Rinaldi had similarly taken all of his skin out of the firm’s Advantage-brand small/mid cap value and small cap value funds, both of which he has managed for years. Wells Fargo said the move was motivated by estate planning, according to Kinnel. 

“That makes me wonder if he is nearing retirement; he’s now likely in his 70s, as he graduated from college in 1965,” the Morningstar research head wrote. “I’d feel better if his co-managers showed more enthusiasm for these funds.” One of Rinaldi’s two deputies has between $10,000 and $50,000 in each fund, Kinnel said, while the other co-portfolio manager has nothing in either. 

LSV Asset Management and Scout Investments also made the Morningstar list. 

LSV’s CIO Josef Lakonishok has dissolved his $1 million-plus stake in the firm’s small cap value mutual fund, while retaining large allocations in four other strategies. 

Finally, Milwaukee-based Scout told Morningstar that Managing Director Mark Egan had liquidated his shares in its unconstrained bond program for tax reasons, but was now reinvested. Two of his co-managers have upwards of $1 million each in the fund, as of the latest available filings. 

In most instances, asset management companies did not explain why portfolio managers had liquidated their own investments, Kinnel wrote in his Morningstar post. 

“There are some plausible excuses, such as divorce or home purchases, to explain why they might have sold their holdings,” he continued. “Other possible reasons could include managers moving their money to other funds that they think focus on a more appealing asset class.”  

“Still, it’s pretty discouraging to see managers selling” these funds, which Kinnel described as all having  “some appeal.”

Read Russel Kinnel’s full post for Morningstar: “Fund Managers Who Spit Out Their Own Cooking.” 

Deutsche Bank To Pay $55M, Ending Derivatives Probe

The German banking giant settles yet another investigation while shareholders demand a revamp of the management board.

Deutsche Bank has been fined $55 million by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for misstating the value of a complex derivatives portfolio during the financial crisis.

According to the regulator, the banking giant neither admitted nor denied allegations of underestimating “a material risk for potential losses estimated to be in the billions of dollars.”

“Deutsche Bank failed to make reasonable judgments when valuing its positions and lacked robust internal controls over financial reporting,” said Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC’s division of enforcement.

By incorrectly valuing its derivatives portfolio, the bank underestimated its risks by anywhere between $1.5 billion and $3.3 billion, the SEC said.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“Deutsche Bank failed to make reasonable judgments when valuing its positions and lacked robust internal controls over financial reporting.” —SECIn a response to the SEC’s statements, Deutsche Bank said these risks “never materialized” and it never experienced any losses from the misrepresentations in the financial accounts.

Furthermore, it maintained that there was no “reliable method” for measuring risk in the portfolio following the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

Tuesday’s settlement is the latest in Deutsche Bank’s legal woes.

The bank was fined $2.5 billion last month to settle charges of manipulating interest rate benchmarks with regulators in the US and the UK. And according to the company’s 2014 annual report, it still faces fines related to foreign exchange and mortgage and asset-backed securities.

Deutsche Bank also suffered major shareholder criticism last week as UK fund manager Hermes called for an overhaul of the management board following large fines and falling profits.

“We urge the bank’s supervisory board to review the composition of the management board, taking its performance over the last three years and its new strategy into account,” Hermes said in a statement on May 20.

The firm voted against Deutsche Bank’s reshuffling plan, as a way to express “our lack of confidence in the management board.”

Hermes said the bank had wasted time and credibility by failing to recognize the need for “changes to [its] structure and business model required to sustainably create value in a changed regulatory environment.”

The firm also criticized Deutsche Bank’s recent settlement for LIBOR rigging and said the fine shone light onto the “severity of the misconduct” of the bank’s employees.

Related Content: Six Banks Fined $5.8B Over FX Rigging; Deutsche Bank Censured for Shoddy Reporting

«