Shareowners, FTC OK Amazon, Whole Foods Deal

Walmart to team with Google in response.

Whole Foods shareowners and federal regulators alike proved analysts right, voting “yay” on the $13.7 billion acquisition from online retail goliath Amazon on Wednesday. The deal is expected to close by the end of the year.

Shareholders voted for the merger in the earlier portion of the day, and the Federal Trade Commission —which regulates consumer protection as well as investigates anti-competitive marketplace practices— approved of the deal later in the day.

“The FTC conducted an investigation of this proposed acquisition to determine whether it substantially lessened competition under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, or constituted an unfair method of competition under Section 5 of the FTC Act,” acting director Hoffman said in a statement. “Based on our investigation we have decided not to pursue this matter further. Of course, the FTC always has the ability to investigate anticompetitive conduct should such action be warranted.”
At the time of the announcement in June, the deal rattled the market as grocery stocks shifted, boosting Amazon and Whole Foods stocks 2.44% and 29.10%, respectively.

The arrangement will cement Amazon more firmly in the physical retail world—most notably the grocery sector—in which it has been experimenting via AmazonFresh, Amazon Books, and the checkout-free Amazon Go stores. 

However, the competition is less than friendly, as Google and Walmart—the world’s largest company by revenue—announced a partnership Wednesday. Starting next month, Google will start selling Walmart products on Google Express. Google will also remove its $95 annual membership fee and will offer free delivery on orders above a minimum. Walmart will also implement Google’s voice-shopping technology into its 4,700 US stores.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Amazon says it does not plan to lay off any Whole Foods employees or implement any Amazon Go technology into stores—which will continue to operate under the Whole Foods name.

Tags: , , , ,

Fidelity: UK Pensioners Face 46% Lower Income Than Before ’07 Crash

Important not to abandon hope,” associate director says.

UK employees who retire this year  will experience a 46% reduction in their pension income compared to if they had retired in 2007, before the market crash, according to a new report from Fidelity International.

The report—which shows how pension income in the last 10 years has been affected by the financial crisis compared to the previous 10-year period (from 1997-2007)—found that after saving and buying an annuity at current market rates with their pension pot, those retiring this year have suffered a significantly more dramatic pension income loss in the post-credit crunch world than those that retired just before the crunch hit.

The average 2007 retiree had earnings that maintained their buying power, tracking at 0.9% above consumer price inflation (CPI). The opposite is true for 2017 pensioners, with wage growth a full percentage point under the 2.7% CPI.

As a result of lower earnings—and therefore lower contributions—combined with poor stock markets and annuity rates, post-crisis pensioners’ pension pots are three-quarters of their pre-crisis counterparts at an average of £139,110 vs. £180,106, Fidelity determined. When it came to securing guaranteed income, current-year pensioners walked away with only 46% of their buying power.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“This all makes grim reading for the 2017 cohort of retirees, yet it’s important not to abandon hope. In the period since the crisis, the pension freedoms reforms have freed many more people to access their pension pot using drawdown instead of an annuity,” Ed Monk, associate director at personal investing, Fidelity International, said in a statement. “This comes with greater risk, but at least provides an alternative to being locked into low-paying annuities, and gives you greater flexibility over how you manage your income. For those still with some years to go before they retire, there’s a chance to make more of the time available left to save.”

Fidelity International’s comparison chart can be viewed below.

Tags: , , ,

«