Seth Klarman Outfoxes Wildfires with Canny Insurance Bet on Utility

Billionaire hedge fund operator offsets equity stake in woebegone PG&E with purchase of liability claims against it.

Now we know how it looks when hedge funds successfully play the ends against the middle. Check out billionaire Seth Klarman’s canny move to cover his misbegotten flier on PG&E.

This comes as the California utility announced Monday that it will file for bankruptcy protection due to its admitted responsibility for the most destructive wildfire in state history last fall.

Klarman’s hedge fund, Baupost Group, loaded up on 14.5 million of PG&E shares in the third quarter, before the fires started in November. His stake was worth just under $900 million at the end of September.

Worth about $49 per share in early November, before the wildfire ignited, PG&E’s stock traded at just above $8 at Monday’s close. That implies that Klarman’s stake has plunged in price by about 83%. What’s unclear, though, is if he sold any of his stock holdings since then.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Cleverly, Klarman has hedged his equity bet on PG&E by buying $1 billion in insurance claims against the power company, according to Bloomberg News. Baupost specializes in this esoteric field, known as subrogation. The hedge fund bought the claims for up to 35 cents on the dollar, Bloomberg reported. The claims were in connection with previous wildfires, in 2017.

As the state’s largest utility declared its plans to file for Chapter 11, PG&E faces billions of dollars in potential liability. That’s as a result of the fires, many of them started by the company’s equipment amid a drought that left woodlands extremely flammable.

Baupost recently reported that it was up 2.8% for the year through November. That’s a good bit better than its peers—global hedge funds lost 0.1% for the period, Hedge Fund Research found. Baupost benefited from its large equity position in Twenty-First Century Fox, which surged in price after the entertainment firm’s deal with Walt Disney.

The hedge fund could not be reached for comment.

Tags: , , ,

Bill Proposes Creation of Pension Rehabilitation Administration

Proposed legislation aims to save critical and declining multiemployer pension plans.

Rep. Richard Neal, a Massachusetts Democrat, has reintroduced a bill intended to help save struggling multiemployer pension plans.

The Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pensions Act seeks to establish a new agency within the Department of the Treasury that would be authorized to issue bonds to finance loans to “critical and declining” status multiemployer pension plans.

According to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC), projections for its multiemployer program “show a very high likelihood of insolvency” during fiscal year 2025. Additionally, approximately 130 of the multiemployer plans that PBGC insures have declared that they will be unable to raise enough contributions to avoid insolvency within the next 20 years.

“We all know retirees with failing multiemployer pension plans who now find themselves in a devastating predicament,” said Neal in a release. “In fact, there are 1.5 million Americans who are in plans that are quickly running out of money … there’s no time to waste in addressing this crisis.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The bill proposes to establish the Pension Rehabilitation Administration (PRA), which would be funded from within the Treasury Department’s appropriated budget. The PRA would be authorized to issue bonds to finance loans to critical and declining status multiemployer pension plans, plans that have suspended benefits, as well as some recently insolvent plans receiving financial assistance from the PBGC.

The bond proceeds would be kept in a separate Treasury fund known as the Pension Rehabilitation Trust Fund (PRTF). The PRA would be authorized to make loans from the PRTF to struggling multiemployer defined benefit plans, and the amount of the loan would equal what the plan needs to fund its obligations for the benefits of participants and beneficiaries in pay status at the time the loan is made.

The terms would require any plan receiving loans to make interest payments for 29 years, with final interest and principal repayment due in the 30th year.

The bill also calls for a presidentially appointed director who would have a term of five years, and who would have the power to appoint deputy directors, officers, and employees.

“This is not a bailout,” insists Neal. “These plans would be required by law to pay back the loans they receive from the PRA—the federal government is simply backstopping the risk.”

Neal added that the bill does not allow for any cuts to the benefits workers and retirees earned while on the job.

Tags: , , , ,

«