SEC Questions Strategy for Thinly Traded Securities

‘One-size-fits-all’ equity market structure ‘may not be optimal’ for low-volume trades.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is soliciting ideas from the public for improvements to the secondary market structure for exchange-listed equity securities that trade in low volume, or thinly traded securities.

The issue is fundamentally rooted in the equity market’s static structure, which follows a “one-size-fits-all” philosophy and consequentially materializes a relatively unfavorable situation for securities traded in low volumes.

“Although the Commission believes that the current equity market structure generally works well for securities that trade in higher volume, the Commission has concerns that the current ‘one-size-fits-all’ equity market structure…may not be optimal for thinly traded securities.”

Issues regarding the difficulties typically paired with thinly traded securities, such as “wider spreads and less displayed size relative to securities that trade in greater volume, often resulting in higher transaction costs for investors,” pose a concern for potential investors who might worry about liquidity issues. This might potentially lead to hesitancy to invest in the issuer’s securities, subsequently hampering the issuer’s financing efforts.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

According to an October 2017 Capital Markets Report published by the US Department of the Treasury, “the current ‘one-size-fits-all’ structure of the equity markets is not operating effectively for smaller companies that experience lower levels of liquidity today…liquidity requires a large pool of investors who want to buy and sell securities, as well as venues that allow them to interact.”

As a result of the report, the Treasury requested the SEC look into the issue to consider whether to bring about regulatory changes “aimed at promoting improved liquidity for these companies by tailoring regulation more appropriately to improve the market for less liquid stocks.”

One culprit is equity market regulation that encourages competition among multiple trading venues, intended to benefit trade execution pricing and market innovation. While this works well for heavily trade stocks because the trading volume can support many trading venues, it’s not so great for thinly traded stocks, because relatively small volumes of securities are spread out among different areas.

The Treasury noted that “this fragmented volume makes finding the contra side to a trade more difficult and can disincentivize market makers to quote in large size on any given trading volume as they limit their quoting size to better manage their risk.”

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said, “As we have heard from issuers, exchanges, and other market participants, a one-size-fits-all approach to market structure does not work for many of our public issuers, particularly small and medium sized companies. We want to know if more can be done to improve secondary market quality for thinly traded securities, and we look forward to seeing proposals geared to enhance trading and liquidity for this segment of the market while maintaining or improving market integrity.”

Related Stories:

SEC Stops $1.7 Billion Unregistered Digital Offering

Blockchain Firm to Pay SEC $24 Million for Unregistered ICO

SEC Finalizes ‘Test-The-Water’ Policy Expansion, Allowing Companies to Solicit Investor Interest Before IPOs

Tags: , , ,

Judge Axes Pension Fund Lawsuit over Healthcare Shift

Pension participants filed suit after program’s pullout from healthcare coverage.

A judge threw out a class action lawsuit against the Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund over its shucking of  a group health insurance plan in favor of a flat fee for retirees to use in finding their own care.

The suit, filed in December in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, claimed the Ohio Police and Fire Board breached a contract by altering rules to retirees’ healthcare plans. The plaintiffs complained that they were saddled with high deductibles and a limited network of doctors.

But Judge Richard Frye dismissed the action, ruling that the pension plan’s board was not responsible for furnishing retirees with healthcare coverage. “Despite these difficulties, it is abundantly clear in the record that the OP&F Board was thorough and conscientious in trying to accomplish the transition,” the judge wrote.

Starting in 2019, Ohio police and fire retirees were moved from a group insurance plan to a stipend system that forces them to buy private, individual plans. This mainly affected retirees who were not yet eligible for Medicare, which begins at 65. The new system only distributed monthly stipends to retirees to assist in paying for coverage purchased in the private marketplace.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Retirees accused board members of failing to adequately investigate the healthcare platform AON, which provided the private insurance marketplace. They said AON representatives had meetings around the state and made promises they could not deliver.

Related stories:

Ohio Public Pension Seeks Legislative Approval to Reduce COLAs

Ohio School Pension Fund Tilting to Infrastructure

Kentucky Pension Lawsuit Alleging Hedge Fund Fraud Dismissed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

«