SEC Private Funds Rule Challenged in 5th Circuit

The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments Monday in National Association of Fund Managers v. Securities and Exchange Commission, which challenges the SEC’s private fund advisers rule, finalized in August 2023.

Three judges heard oral arguments in New Orleans on Monday from the SEC and from the plaintiffs, a group led by the National Association of Private Fund Managers that also includes the American Investment Council and Managed Funds Association, according to court documents.

According to those present and to news reports from the courtroom, the judges asked pointed questions that cast doubt on whether the SEC has the authority to regulate private funds. They also suggested that the fast-growing private funds market is a sign of success, not that it requires sweeping regulation. Reports also noted, however, that one judge did not think the plaintiff’s arguments were strong enough to throw out the entire rule, only parts.

The SEC’s rule, which had received widespread industry pushback, requires private fund advisers to give their clients quarterly statements on the performance of the fund, as well as its fees and other expenses, and obtain an annual audit for every fund they advise. Advisers must also provide a valuation and fairness opinion for adviser-led sales of holdings in the private fund. Advisers are also forbidden under the rule “from providing investors with preferential treatment regarding redemptions and information if such treatment would have a material, negative effect on other investors.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

Lastly, advisers may not pass on expenses incurred as a result of regulatory or judicial sanction for a violation of the Advisers Act and can only pass on investigation-related expenses if their clients consent to it.

A coalition of trade groups led by the National Association of Fund Managers filed a petition for review with the 5th Circuit in September 2023. The groups argued that “the new rules would fundamentally change the way private funds are regulated in America.” The petition describes the rule as arbitrary and capricious and states that it exceeded the SEC’s statutory authority to regulate private funds, which are typically invested in only by sophisticated and deep-pocketed investors who do not require the same disclosures as retail investors.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a business advocacy group, filed an amicus brief in November which argued that the SEC has effectively “claimed the authority to erase the fundamental distinction between public and private funds” and is acting beyond its authority under the Investment Company Act and Advisers Act.

The 5th Circuit hears appeals from cases in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. In the petition, the trade groups wrote that the venue for the review was appropriate because at least one petitioner has a “‘principal office or place of business’” in the circuit. The judges assigned to the case are all Republican appointees: Circuit Judge Leslie Southwick was appointed by President George W. Bush, and Circuit Judges Kurt Engelhardt and Cory Wilson were appointed by President Donald Trump.

Tags: private funds, SEC

The Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund announced on January 31 a return of 9.1% for its 2023 fiscal year, which ended June 30, 2023.

The results were released as a part of the fund’s annual comprehensive financial report. The pension fund, the oldest in Illinois, has released this annual report since 1915.

Assets under management increased to $12.1 billion at the end of the fiscal year, an increase from $11.8 billion at the end of fiscal 2022. The fund reported one-, five- and 10-year returns of 9.1%, 7.3% and 8.0%, respectively.

The fund reported the following asset class returns:

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

Domestic equity – 18.9%;
International equity – 16.5%;
Infrastructure – 10.6%;
Fixed income – negative 0.3%;
Private equity – negative 1.1%; and
Real estate – negative 4.1%.
The fund allocated 30.5% of its portfolio to domestic equity and another 30.5% to international equity. Fixed income made up 18.7% of the fund, and real estate had an allocation of 11.4%. The rest of the fund was comprised of private equity (8.2%), infrastructure (2.0%), public REITs (0.9%) and cash equivalents (0.0%).

Despite underperforming its benchmark performance of 9.5%, the fund’s annual return was beneficial in boosting the pension’s funded status. The CTPF reported that the funded ratio of the fund increased to 47.2% at the end of the fiscal year, up from 46.8% at the end of fiscal 2022. The funded status remains down from 53.2% in fiscal 2021 its 10-year high of 55.6% in fiscal 2014.

The CTPF, like many Illinois pension funds, is woefully underfunded. In December 2023, the state contributed $6.2 billion to the Teachers’ Retirement System of Illinois, a similar fund for teachers on a state level that does not include Chicago-area educators, which has a funded ratio of 44.8%.

According to the CTPF’s statutory funding policy, the fund projects a 90% funded ratio in the year 2059, which the fund notes is a plan “heavily dependent on the state and board of education contributing the statutory required contributions each year until 2059.”