SEC: Private Equity Firms and Illegal Fee Collections

An examination of private equity firms the last two years revealed an “enormous grey area” of hidden fees and expense-shifting, costing investors proper monitoring of investments.

(May 7, 2014) — The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it found overwhelming evidence of illegal fee collection in an examination of private equity firms since 2012. 

“When we examined how fees and expenses are handled by advisers to private equity funds, we have identified what we believe are violations of law or material weaknesses in controls over 50% of the time,” said Andrew Bowden, director of the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE), at the Private Fund Compliance Forum. “This is a remarkable statistic.” 

The OCIE, the “eyes and ears of the commission” with over 900 examiners, said it has initiated examinations of more than 150 newly registered private equity advisers since 2012. The observations pointed to certain risks and temptations in the $3.5 trillion industry, Bowden said.

The most egregious problems were found in “an enormous grey area” of fees and expenses, according to the SEC.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“Many limited partnership agreements are broad in their characterization of the types of fees and expenses that can be charged to portfolio companies,” Bowden said. “Poor disclosure in this area is a frequent source of exam findings.”

The SEC discovered cases of accelerated monitoring fees that limited partners were often unaware of. Some private equity firms have caused their portfolio companies to sign monitoring agreements with fee obligations of 10 years or longer despite the fact that holding periods are usually around five years. 

And the termination of such agreements would also allow the private equity firms to collect a fee—one potentially exceeding eight figures. 

“There is usually no disclosure of this practice at the point when these monitoring agreements are signed, and the disclosure that does exist when the accelerations are triggered is usually too little too late,” Bowden said.

In his speech, Bowden also mentioned significant compliance shortfalls including lack of due diligence and transparency after an investor closes an investment. Limited partners are often left in the dark without sufficient information to properly monitor an investment, he said, due to opaque and imprecise language in partnership agreements.

A common flaw found in these agreements was the use of “operating partners” or consultants promoted by private equity firms, the SEC said. Often paid directly by portfolio companies, they are hired and used without the investors having full disclosure. Fees are billed to the companies owned by private equity firms in addition to management fees and carried interest, thereby reducing the overall profits and returns. 

“This effectively creates an additional ‘back door’ fee that many investors do not expect, especially since operating partners often look and act just like other [private equity] adviser employees,” Bowden said.

The OCIE recommended increased support from top management of compliance efforts to realign general partner and investor needs.

“Complexity and rapid growth have created governance and compliance issues that should be addressed as these firms mature and evolve,” Bowden said. “It all starts at the top.”

Related Content: SEC to Probe PE and Hedge Funds

L&G Distribution Head Joins Och Ziff

Hugh Cutler has moved from the passive investment giant to an asset-gathering hedge fund.

(May 7, 2014) — The former head of distribution for Europe and the Middle East at Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) has joined one of the world’s largest hedge funds, aiCIO has learned.

Hugh Cutler started at Och Ziff this month as head of European investor relations, according to sources close to the matter. He quit LGIM, one of the UK’s largest insurance-backed investment managers, last month after a five-year tenure. Previously he had spent nine years at Barclays Global Investors—departing around the time of its acquisition by BlackRock—but began his career as an consultant and actuary at Towers Perrin.

This month, Och Ziff announced its estimated assets under management had grown from $35 billion in March 2013 to $43.5 billion at May 1, 2014. This reflected year-to-date capital net inflows of approximately $3.6 billion and performance-related depreciation of $290.5 million. In contrast, LGIM revealed today that its UK assets under management had reached £462.6 billion by the end of March this year.

Chairman and CEO Daniel Och said the company was pleased with its progress in 2014 towards its “strategic objective of becoming a multi-product, alternative asset manager,” adding :“Our year-to-date net inflows through May 1st are the highest for this period that we have had since going public in 2007, and are reflective of the growing diversification of our platforms.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The inflows came despite a tough time for the hedge fund manager. On March 18, the firm’s stock slipped 6% in the first hour of trading after an admission it was under scrutiny by two US government agencies for possible breaches of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and related laws prohibiting public US companies from bribing overseas officials. In just two days, however, it has recovered the majority of those losses. Trading under the ticker symbol OZM, by close on March 20 the firm had regained all but 2% of its pre-disclosure value.

However, the firm faces stiff competition. 2013 was the most prolific year for hedge fund manager launches in the UK to date, with 38 new groups setting up business, data published today by Preqin showed.

Och Ziff had not returned calls for comment by the time of going to press.

Related content: Hedge Funds Off to Slowest Start Since 2008 & SEC to Probe PE and Hedge Funds

«