The Securities and Exchange Commission this week decided not to pass a controversial proposal that would have required swing pricing and a related hard-close pricing policy for mutual funds that are popular in employer-sponsored retirement plans.
The SEC Wednesday did approve, by a 3-to-2 margin, amendments to require timelier reporting of portfolio holdings, monthly instead of quarterly, filing for open-end and closed-end funds, as well as exchange-traded funds. It did not move ahead with previously related swing pricing and hard close mandates for open-end funds. Though it also did not say it would never implement them, mutual fund managers and 401(k) investment providers should be feeling relief, according to Jay Baris, a partner in Sidley Austin LLP’s investment funds group.
“The headline here is what they didn’t do,” Baris says of the ruling. “In that sense, the industry dodged a bullet.”
Baris notes widespread industry opposition to the proposal in the form of letters and pushback the SEC received throughout its information-gathering process. The swing pricing proposal would have required funds to report pricing information related to the size and frequency of price adjustments with the goal of protecting investors from major swings, along with implementing a hard close of trading for funds at 4 p.m. ET.
Opponents of the proposal included the Investment Company Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, both of which noted that the proposal would significantly limit investment management discretion and be both costly and challenging for mutual funds and intermediaries to implement—costs that would then be passed on to investors.
The SEC and its chairman, Gary Gensler, however, have argued for the provisions to protect investors from market volatility. Gensler has noted that the 2020 market hit from the COVID-19 pandemic caused concern that funds might not be able to meet redemption requests due to the heavy flow of traffic.
Gensler has also suggested in public remarks, however, that the SEC may opt for a liquidity fee to be imposed for open-end funds, instead of the swing pricing and hard close proposal. The regulator instituted a liquidity fee on money markets in 2023, going into effect in October, to combat runs on those investments.
Pushback Noticed
Baris says the industry pushback was so widespread that the SEC may have been “surprised by the intensity of the opposition.” While the proposals were not taken off the table, Baris notes it is telling that the SEC specifically said it was avoiding implementation in its 136-page final ruling.“We also are not adopting proposed reporting amendments relating to funds’ use of swing pricing or to liquidity classifications in this release, as we are not adopting amendments to the underlying rules at this time,” the regulators wrote.
Baris said he would be “surprised” if the SEC moved ahead with the proposals again without some kind of public comment period.
In Wednesday’s voting, the SEC opted to amend the requirements for filings known as Form N-PORT and N-CEN, which will go into effect on November 17, 2025.
The Form N-PORT amendments require funds to report monthly within 30 days of the end of the month, as opposed to within 60 days of the end of each quarter. Form N-PORT also now requires funds’ monthly reports be made available to the public within 60 days of the end of each month, as opposed to on a quarterly basis.
This reporting will give the SEC more information on funds, particularly during times of market volatility, according to Douglas McCormack, a counsel in Sidley Austin’s investments funds group. That will add additional time and cost for fund managers.
Related Stories:
Gensler Defends SEC Proposals at House Oversight Hearing
Gensler Defends Swing Pricing Proposal Despite Growing Bipartisan Pushback
Tags: Gary Gensler, Mutual Funds, SEC. swing pricing, Securities and Exchange Commission