SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Shkreli Lawyer

Evan Greebel allegedly drafted bogus consulting agreements to fend off disgruntled hedge fund investors.

A federal court has entered a final consent judgment against Evan Greebel, the former lawyer for Martin Shkreli’s Retrophin, who had been charged with aiding and abetting fraud orchestrated by Shkreli.

According to the complaint, which was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Shkreli used Retrophin, a pharmaceutical company where he was CEO, to pay off disgruntled investors in unrelated hedge funds he controlled. 

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleges that Greebel, who was outside counsel and served as Retrophin’s corporate secretary, drafted agreements that falsely stated that the payments to the investors were for consulting services, when they were actually for dropping potential claims against Shkreli. The complaint alleges that the bogus consulting agreements failed to disclose to Retrophin’s board of directors the real purpose of the agreements.

Shkreli was the founder and portfolio manager of hedge funds MSMB Capital Management LP and MSMB Healthcare Management LP. He was also the managing member of MSMB Adviser and MSMB Healthcare Adviser, the investment advisers to the hedge funds. The SEC alleges Shkreli made material misrepresentations and omissions to investors and prospective investors in MSMB Capital Management; lied to an executing broker about the hedge fund’s ability to settle short sales Shkreli had made; and misappropriated funds from the two hedge funds.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

MSMB Capital Management began trading securities in November 2009, but just a year later the value of assets in the hedge fund’s brokerage and bank accounts was only about $331, which the complaint against Shkreli attributes mainly to his poor trading. The hedge fund was able to continue operating because Shkreli successfully solicited an additional $2.35 million in investments in late 2010 and early 2011.

However, by the end of January 2011 more than half of the new money invested was gone due to trading losses, and the net asset value of MSMB Capital Management’s brokerage and bank accounts was only a little more than $1.1 million. Shkreli then allegedly took a short position in a company that resulted in losses of more than $7 million, and by the end of February 2011 the hedge fund’s bank and brokerage accounts had a negative value.

The SEC also alleges Shkreli lied to investors and told them the hedge fund was doing far better than it was. The complaint cites an email Shkreli sent to an investor that claimed that as of July 23, 2010, MSMB Capital Management had “returned +35.77% since inception,” when trading at that point had in reality generated losses of about 18%.

Shkreli, who had also been CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, is best known for raising the price of Turing’s antiparasitic drug Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 a tablet overnight after acquiring the drug in 2015. In 2018, Shkreli was sentenced to seven years in prison for securities fraud and for lying to hedge fund investors and manipulating shares in Retrophin.

Greebel, who was convicted in a related criminal case, consented to a final judgment enjoining him from violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and barring him from serving as an officer or director of a public company. Greebel was convicted in a related criminal case, so the federal court says in light of that conviction, its final judgment does not impose civil monetary penalties. The SEC’s litigation against Shkreli is continuing.

Related Stories:

SEC Charges Biotech Co-Founders with $60 Million Fraud

Health Care Stocks, Once Celebrated, Face a Grim Diagnosis

SEC Charges Biotech Head with Using Pandemic to Defraud Investors

Tags: , , , , , , ,

A New Tech Bubble Is Poised to Pop, Warns Bernstein

Profitless companies with soaring stocks, like Pinterest and Snap, are flirting with trouble, the firm’s analysts say.

Seems like déjà vu all over again, to quote that great sage, Yogi Berra. Alliance Bernstein is warning that a batch of unprofitable stock-market superstars from the tech world is in danger of going south.

If so, it could be painfully reminiscent of the 2000-02 tech wreck, when hot internet companies flamed out spectacularly. Primo example: profitless Pets.com, which had a big ad buy during the Super Bowl back then and was defunct 11 months later.

While the situation now is hardly as bad as two decades ago, current high-fliers that have been in the red for three years are likely to take a dive in coming months, according to Bernstein tech analyst Toni Sacconaghi and his team.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

On his watch list are such earnings-free companies as online pinboard purveyor Pinterest, social media concern Snap, data-analysis software maker Palantir Technologies, and cybersecurity vendor CrowdStrike Holdings.

Today, more than a third of all unprofitable tech stocks trade at greater than 15 times revenues, Sacconaghi wrote in a client note. Tech names with such high multiple and no earnings, he added, historically have shown returns that are “very poor.”   

Right now, this bunch is doing extremely well. And the report found that the group tends to romp as long as growth stocks are climbing, which is still the case now (albeit with a little less exuberance lately). Pinterest, for instance, has gained 380% over the past 12 months. The stock’s price/sales ratio is a lofty 31.1, by Bernstein’s count, as of April 8.

Alas, things tend to go badly after the market turns against growth. Bernstein examined unprofitable tech stocks over the past 50 years that sported price/sales ratios of more than 15. Conclusion: They on average lost 18% over three years and 28% over five years.

Bernstein indicated that the worst results tend to visit the most richly valued tech stocks, as determined by price to sales.

If Sacconaghi is right, then the momentum that has propelled tech stocks for a while now could be flagging. The biggest tech names, such as Apple and Amazon, have prodigious profits, of course.

Although the same can’t be said for the likes of Pinterest and its ilk, at least their revenues are mounting. In last year’s final quarter, revenue soared 76% for Pinterest. And it’s true that the 21st century’s tech titans had their own rough starts. Amazon was in the red for years back in the 1990s.

Related Stories:

Ned Davis: Tech Titans Could Fall 20% This Year

Valuations for Tech Make ‘Less and Less Sense,’ Says Dan Parker

How the Stock Market’s Tech Leaders Will Be Ousted

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

«