SEC Halts Brothers’ Alleged Cryptocurrency Offering Fraud

Sean and Shane Hvizdzak are accused of pocketing $26 million of investors’ funds.


The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed an emergency action and obtained a temporary restraining order and asset freeze against two brothers and three firms they control to stop an alleged offering fraud and the misappropriation of investor proceeds.

The regulator has accused Sean Hvizdzak and Shane Hvizdzak of fraudulently raising and misappropriating millions of dollars from the sale of limited partnership (LP) interests in High Street Capital Fund USA LP, which they claimed would invest in cryptocurrency assets for the benefit of the investors. The two allegedly lied about the fund’s performance, fabricated financial statements, and forged audit documents.

High Street Capital Partners LLC (HSCP) was the fund’s general partner (GP) and was exclusively responsible for managing the fund. Pursuant to an investment management agreement between the fund and High Street Capital (HSC), HSC agreed to serve as the fund’s investment manager. The Hvizdzak brothers solely owned and controlled both HSC and HSCP and were alone responsible for the operations and management of the fund and its investments, the SEC said.

The fund’s private placement memorandum (PPM) stated that the fund operated as a “pooled investment vehicle through which the assets of its general partner and the limited partners” were “invested in a wide variety of cryptocurrency investments.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

According to the SEC’s complaint, the Hvizdzaks pocketed approximately $26 million of the $31 million they collected from investors by moving the investors’ money from the fund’s accounts to their personal bank accounts, and then transferring the assets on multiple blockchains to themselves and others.

The complaint alleges that the Hvizdzaks misrepresented in marketing materials that the fund earned 100.77% and 92.9% on its investments during the third and fourth quarters of 2019, respectively, when the fund actually lost 17.12% and 24.5%, respectively. For all of 2019, the High Street Capital Fund lost approximately $477,000 from its digital asset investments, for a net loss of approximately 25%, according to the complaint.

The PPM explained that the investment vehicle was an “algorithmic quant fund that intends to take advantage of the volatility of the cryptocurrency market,” and its “primary investment objective is to achieve capital appreciation with above average returns” for its limited partners using various predictive indicators.

In addition to granting a temporary restraining order and an asset freeze, the court ordered an accounting, expedited discovery, and an order prohibiting the destruction of documents. A hearing is scheduled for June 30 to consider continuing the asset freeze and the issuance of a preliminary injunction.

“As alleged in our complaint, the Hvizdzaks touted exceptional, but false, performance to potential investors when offering their fund,” Adam Aderton, co-chief of the SEC’s Asset Management Unit, said in a statement. “Investors should be skeptical of claims that seem too good to be true.”

Related Stories:

Supreme Court Reigns in SEC’s Disgorgement Powers

Chinese Nationals Charged with Laundering More Than $100 Million in Cryptocurrency

Blockchain Firm to Pay SEC $24 Million for Unregistered ICO

Tags: , , , , ,

DOL Proposal Will Chill ESG Corporate Pension Investing, Advocates Say

The proposed federal rule takes a dim view of sustainable investing that’s not focused solely on returns.


Advocates of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing have decried the US Department of Labor (DOL)’s newest proposal as poison for sustainable investments in pension plans. 

On Tuesday, the DOL proposed a rule that said company defined benefit (DB) retirement plans have a fiduciary duty to beneficiaries, not to social causes advanced through ESG investing that could reduce returns or increase risk. 

“Private employer-sponsored retirement plans are not vehicles for furthering social goals or policy objectives that are not in the financial interest of the plan,” Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia said in a statement. 

Scalia added: “Rather, ERISA [Employee Retirement Income Security Act] plans should be managed with unwavering focus on a single, very important social goal: providing for the retirement security of American workers.” 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The proposal would only affect private employer plans, which have not been as active or outspoken about ESG investing as have some of their peers in endowments and foundations or in public pension funds. 

But ESG supporters say the proposal targets a growing trend in sustainable objectives, such as climate change and diversity, that they say do not run contrary to fiduciary considerations. 

“The DOL proposal is out of step with professional investment managers, who increasingly analyze ESG factors precisely because of risk, return, and fiduciary considerations,” the Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (US SIF), an advocacy group, said Wednesday in a response

“Generating more hurdles to the incorporation of ESG criteria will have a chilling effect, leading to plan participants losing access to ESG options—many of which have outperformed their indices over time and especially during the market shock related to COVID-19,” the response continued. 

“You’re obliged as a fiduciary to take these issues into account, and the DOL is questioning whether you should do that,” said Tim Smith, director of ESG Shareholder Engagement at Boston Trust Walden. 

Experts say that the DOL may want to tamp a trend many have touted as the future of investing. At the start of this year, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink said in his influential annual letter to chief executives that his firm would make sustainability a core goal for investments

But that may have spooked the Department of Labor, which has urged caution to investors in the past against relying on ESG ratings or including ESG considerations in investment policies. If passed, the proposal could have far-reaching consequences on the broader industry, including ratings agencies and ESG products. 

“The Department of Labor is clearly worried that ESG is politicized and they’re worried that participants’ assets are jeopardized if plan fiduciaries are pursuing ESG investments for reasons other than investment performance,” said George Michael Gerstein, co-chair of fiduciary governance at Stradley Ronon Stevens and Young. 

Experts also say that public pension plan leaders should take note of the rule. The regulation and the preamble commentary could inform analysis on potential fiduciary breaches under state law. The proposal is currently open for a 30-day comment period.

“This is a fairly aggressive regulation proposal that could have a real, significant impact on the ESG industry,” Gerstein said. 

Related Stories: 

Pandemic Spurs Investor Interest in Social Bonds

Vatican Calls for Catholics to Divest from Fossil Fuels

Supreme Court Reigns in SEC’s Disgorgement Powers

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«