Scary Similarity: The Roaring Twenties and Today

Then resembles now a lot, says State Street’s Arone.  And we know how the 1920s ended.

An eerie thought: The decade that began 100 years ago, known as the Roaring Twenties, was awash in prosperity amid a booming stock market—and came to a nasty end.

“Can’t repeat the past?” asked Michael Arone, chief investment strategist for State Street Global Advisors US Intermediary Business Group. “Why of course you can!” Writing in a recent market commentary, Arone sketched out the parallels between the decade we’re now entering to the one from a century before, with its financial excesses.

Arone emphasized that just as now, the 1920s started with a surge of new technology, such as radios and vacuum cleaners. Electricity use became widespread. So did automobile ownership. More important, that decade’s soaring stocks had three catalysts: low inflation, tax cuts, and an easy-money Federal Reserve. That’s the same as now.

Inflation at the outset of the 1920s was similar to today’s, at 1.4% annually. Congress cut taxes, which had been hiked to a top rate of 75% during World War I, in several stages to 25% by the 2025 tax year. For 2020, the highest level is 37%, following the late-2017 tax reduction. Back in the day, the Fed chopped rates from 6% at the decade’s outset to 2% by 1925. The current Federal benchmark range is 1.5% to 1.75%.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

And the market loved all this, then and now. “Low inflation, tax cuts, and an accommodative Fed supported the market in the 1920s, obscuring the asset bubble forming beneath the surface,” Arone recounted. “With the same forces bolstering today’s market, major US stock benchmarks are at all-time highs and market volatility remains low.”

The Fed made some big mistakes, of course, at the end of the 1920s. In mid-1929, to take the momentum out of rampant market speculation and escalating debt, the central bank lifted rates to 6%. That action proved to be disastrous. As the saying now goes, the Fed often causes recessions by over-reacting.

The 1929 stock market crash followed, with stocks losing half their value in one month. The Great Depression hit soon.

The present-day Fed seems to have learned the lesson of 100 years ago, although last year it needed a reminder, as President Donald Trump, other pols, and many on Wall Street protested. The Fed interrupted its campaign to raise rates, and in three successive moves, it lowered them to where they are in 2020. As the market surged anew on the monetary loosening, the Fed said it won’t consider raising them unless excessive inflation shows up.

Ben Bernanke in 2002, then a Fed governor and four years away from becoming chairman, stated, “Regarding the Great Depression … we did it. We’re very sorry. … We won’t do it again.” The occasion was the 90th birthday party of economist Milton Friedman, a Nobel Prize winner who was critical of the Fed intervention in general and its policies in the late 1920s in particular.

To State Street’s Arone, “At the dawn of a new decade, governments and central banks seem committed to keeping the party going, but risks seem heavily skewed to the downside.” In his commentary, he evoked the distant green light at the end of a dock in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, a novel that chronicled the wild times of the Roaring Twenties. The green light symbolized dreams for the future.

“Yes, the light on the horizon is still green,” Arone wrote, “but it could soon start flashing yellow.”

Related Stories:

3 Changes in American Investing that the Crisis Brought

Who Smashed the Up Ramp to the American Dream? Wall Street

So, the Federal Reserve Doesn’t Care About the Stock Market? Baloney

Tags: , , , , , ,

More Than Half of UK Public Universities Commit to Divest Fossil Fuel

Divestment campaign gathers steam with 79 universities signing on since 2014.

The rate at which UK public universities are abandoning investments in fossil fuels has accelerated during the past few years, and now more than half have either divested or pledged to divest from the fossil fuel industry, according to student-led campaign group People & Planet.

The group said 79 of the UK’s 154 public universities, as well as two universities in Ireland, have joined the fossil fuel divestment campaign and have committed to divest an estimated $14.3 billion from fossil fuels in some form. Divestment has become a key feature of environmental, social, and governance investing, or ESG.

The divestment crusade started in 2014 when Glasgow University committed to fully divest $23.5 million from fossil fuel companies over the next 10 years, and another 13 universities followed suit the following year. Another 20 universities made promises to divest in 2016, 14 more made divestment commitments in 2017, and another 30 pledged to divest in 2018 and 2019. Earlier this month, Aberystwyth University became the 79th university when it committed to full divestment.

The activist group’s aim is for all educational institutions to “exclude the fossil fuel industry from their investment portfolio, introduce publicly accessible ethical investment policy excluding the fossil fuel industry. ” It seeks full divestment by the universities within three years.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“That universities across the sector are now divesting so fully and quickly demonstrates how far the fossil fuel industry’s social license has been eroded over the last seven years,” Chris Saltmarsh, People & Planet’s co-director, climate change campaigns, told the Guardian newspaper. “It is increasingly common sense on UK campuses that these companies can play no productive role in solving the climate crisis.”  

The UK is among the more progressive countries divesting from the fossil fuel industry, and not just because of its university students. Last May more than 250 current and former members of the UK’s Parliament called for their pension fund, the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund (PCPF), to disclose its carbon-intensive investment, and to quickly phase out fossil fuel investments.

In 2018 the Church of England voted to divest £12 billion in holdings of fossil fuel companies if they are not fighting global warming quickly enough. The Church said that oil and gas companies that have not aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement by 2023 will see divestment from the $10.9 billion Church Commissioners investment fund, the Church’s $3 billion retirement fund, and an additional $2.6 billion in other Church funds.

Related Stories:

Church of England Votes to Divest from Fossil Fuels

University of California Endowment, Pension to Divest All Fossil Fuels

UK MPs Call for Parliament’s Pension Fund to Divest Fossil Fuels

 

Tags: , , , , ,

«