Royal Mail Pension Trustees Agree to Changes

Board “reluctantly” agrees to close sections of the pension plan.

The board of trustees for the UK’s Royal Mail Pension Plan has agreed to the Royal Mail’s proposal to close sections B and C of the pension fund.

“This was a difficult decision for the board to take, but it was taken, reluctantly, after having heard arguments from all sides and weighing up all the relevant issues,” said Joanna Matthews, chair of Royal Mail Pension Trustees Limited in a letter to plan participants. “The trustees’ advisers found that if the plan remained open and benefits continued to build up there was a risk that the plan would be unable to pay all the benefits that have been built up by the members once the current surplus is used up.”

Matthews added that “the advice was that the plan should not rely on Royal Mail being able to afford to provide any additional funding in future.”

Section B provides benefits for members of the plan who joined after November 30, 1971, and section C provides benefits for members who joined since April 1, 1987.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The plan, which has more than 121,000 members, will be closed to future accrual on March 31, 2018, and it will only affect Royal Mail employee members of the pension. Until then, the company’s contribution rate will remain at 17.1% of members’ pensionable pay. But from April 2018, members would no longer build up future pension on a defined benefit basis, but on a defined contribution basis.

The decision came just after Royal Mail said in its most recent pension plan valuation that the cost of benefits are out clipping the the total annual contributions by £900 million ($1.16 billion). It also said that the actuarial funding surplus would be depleted during 2018 if the plan remained in its current form. After 2018, Royal Mail said the annual cost would be more than double the current contributions.

“The cost of benefits being accrued each year, based on market conditions at the end ofMarch 2017, would currently be around£1.3 billion,” Royal Mail said in its 2018 pension plan valutaion. “This is significantly greater than the total annual contributions of around£400 millionthat the company and employees make.”

The Communication Workers Union (CWU) has condemned Royal Mail’s decision to close its current defined benefit pension plan.

“In place of the current defined benefit scheme, Royal Mail plan to put all members into inferior money purchase alternatives,” said the CWO in a statement. “On average, employees face losing up to a third of their future pensions. For a 50 year old Section C member earning £25,000 a year and retiring at 65, this would equate to a loss of £4,392 a year (£109,800 over 25 years).”

Tags: , ,

MPs Call for Parliament’s Pension to Divest from Fossil Fuels

50 members of Parliament join environmental campaign.

Fifty members of Parliament from various political parties have expressed their support for an environmental campaign that is seeking to divest Parliament’s £612 million pension fund from fossil fuels.

The campaign, called Divest Parliament, which was initiated by environmental activist group Fossil Free UK, is calling on all election candidates to commit to reducing the UK’s use of fossil fuels.

“We congratulate these 50 MPs for their commendable leadership on climate change,” said Daniel Selwyn, a member of the Divest Parliament campaign. “Any candidate asking for our vote at this election should recognize their responsibility to not only uphold the UK’s international climate commitments, but also to protect people’s jobs, pensions, and livelihoods, as well as the health of our planet for future generations.” 

Following pressure from constituents and MPs, Parliament’s pension fund, the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund (PCPF), made its top 20 holdings public for the first time in March. The top 20 investments also account for 20% of the total fund. Among the top investments for Parliament’s pension fund that are seen as environmentally unfriendly are oil companies BP and Royal Dutch Shell, tobacco company British American Tobacco, and mining company Rio Tinto.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“Climate change represents a serious financial risk to pension savers and investors across the UK,” said Conservative MP Laura Sandys in a statement. “Climate change represents a serious financial risk to pension savers and investors across the UK.”

According to Divest Parliament, more than 700 institutions and 58,000 individuals have joined the global campaign for fossil fuel divestment, representing $5.46 trillion in assets.

For its part, the PCPF said in its 2016 annual report that it is developing an engagement policy that will set out the terms of their engagement on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues in relation to investments.

“The trustees have agreed to formally incorporate the fund’s position on responsible investment into a separate statement within the fund’s investment principles,” said the report. “The trustees believe that [ESG] issues can have a material impact on the long-term performance of its investments.”

 

Tags: , , ,

«