Report: Small Funds Outperform Larger Counterparts in Real Estate

Investors are flocking to smaller property funds of less than $1 billion in size due to their more focused strategies and better returns, Preqin has found.

(May 9, 2011) — New research by Preqin shows that North America-focused funds with a minimum of $1 billion in commitments are being outperformed by funds of less than $500 million in size for their more focused strategies and superior returns.

The research indicates a reversal of the trend in the years leading up to the financial crisis of 2008, when large property funds dominated the space.

“Given that many larger funds appear to have under-performed in recent years, investors might be expected to focus on the small to mid-size funds; the size of the funds which have been successful in raising capital in 2010 and 2011 certainly suggests that this is the case,” Preqin’s Andrew Moylan, manager of real estate data, says in a release.

The research firm’s findings reveals that 54% of small funds — or firms less than $500 million — are outperforming the median. Meanwhile, only 23% of $1 billion-plus funds are producing top quartile returns, and 60% are producing returns below the median. Preqin data shows 60% of the $8.2 billion capital raised in the first four months of 2011 was by funds managing less than $1 billion of assets. In 2010, these funds accounted for 53% of the $43 billion capital raised.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Furthermore, the report asserts that although several $1 billion-plus property funds were brought to market in Q1 2011, there has been a general decline in their number since September 2008.

The study also found several established firms launched new funds between January to April 2011, indicating that the fundraising market may be heading toward a recovery. “A number of mega funds were launched in Q1 2011, so these managers clearly feel that investor confidence is returning, but while Preqin’s conversations with investors do indicate that they are more likely to make new commitments, fundraising will remain challenging given the number of funds on the road.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

BP Aims to Dismiss Shareholder Claims Over Oil Disaster

The firm has asked US District Judge Keith P. Ellison to restrict any surviving investor fraud claims to owners of BP American depositary receipts, Bloomberg is reporting.

(May 9, 2011) — BP has asked a judge to discard investor claims over the oil spill last year, which caused massive stock market losses.

In June of last year, President Obama sat down with BP officials and agreed to a $20 billion fund for claims that would be funded by BP, but run by the government. The intense political pressure from the US led BP to suspend its quarterly dividend payments.

Yet, shareholders have continued to voice discontent. Led by the pensions of both New York and Ohio, shareholders are now claiming billions of dollars in losses over the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, seeking recovery from BP and its directors and officers. While BP has publicly reiterated its commitment to safety, investors are claiming that the firm violated US securities laws by misleading them about the spill and its aftermath.

According to a filing, obtained by Bloomberg, the investors aim to “transform a matter involving allegedly negligent safety processes into an action for securities fraud’’ and that “securities laws do not protect investors against negligence.’’

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Since the crisis, pension funds have continued to be active participants in putting pressure on BP. In early April, two large US pension funds — the $234.7 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the $156.8 billion Tallahassee-based Florida State Board of Administration (FSBA) — joined a list voting against BP at its annual general meeting over anger at the oil spill. “CalPERS is concerned with the absence of information related to key performance indicators and re-evaluation of the board’s role in oversight of risk management,” the nation’s largest public pension said in a statement.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«