QE2 & Fixed-Income Heavy Portfolios

aiCIO Editor-in-Chief Kip McDaniel speaks with Bob Prince, co-CIO of Bridgewater Associates, and Bryan Belton and Eddie Qian of PanAgora on the Federal Reserve's second round of Quantitative Easing (QE2).

With the second round of Quantitative Easing (QE2) now public knowledge, investors worldwide are wondering what effects this policy will have on their portfolio. Even more than the average investor, however, institutional funds – and pension funds in particular – have moved heavily into fixed-income investments in recent years, either through risk parity or liability-driven investment strategies. Understandably, they are wondering how the Federal Reserve’s announcement that it will purchase $600 billion in US Treasuries will affect their investments.

To help these investors, aiCIO has reached out to the vendors offering such strategies, and asked them to comment on the future of their industry. Everything must be taken with a grain of salt, of course – they are, as they would admit, selling something – but such firms wouldn’t be in business long if they lost their client’s money. So here it is: what the men of Bridgewater Associates and PanAgora Asset Management think of QE2 and its effects on bond-heavy portfolio.

QE2 in the short-term…

Bob Prince, co-CIO, Bridgewater Associates: “Given that risk parity portfolios hold a balanced allocation across asset classes, they derive their returns from the aggregate risk premium across asset classes rather than the pricing of any one asset class. The aggregate risk premium of risky assets vs. cash is now relatively high and QE2 is likely to bring it down. This would be good for the returns of risk parity portfolios in the near term.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Eddie Qian, CIO, PanAgora: “Almost all asset classes have risen in value in the anticipation of QE2. If you look across all asset class, it’s a liquidity injection. So risk parity has performed quite well in the last two months. In the short term, I think it could still be positive.”

Bryan Belton, Director of Macro-Strategies, PanAgora: “One of the things I’ve learned: don’t fight the Fed. They have been very explicit about what they want to do. QE2, the buying of $600 billion in Treasuries, they clearly want to move yields lower. In general, it is not a good idea to bet against them. Last week, watching the non-farm payroll figures come out – exceptional number – [I saw] ten-years yields spiked, and then it fell lower and lower and lower. If there was a reason for them to spike, it was that, but people don’t want to fight the Fed.”

QE2 in the long-term…

Bob Prince of Bridgewater Associates: “Longer term, these influences come and go, leaving a moderate amount of volatility around the longer term expected return of the risk parity portfolio, ultimately leading to an expected return to risk ratio of about 0.6.”

Bryan Belton of PanAgora: “Over a longer-term view, QE2 works or it doesn’t work. What they’re trying to do, they’re very explicit, is prevent Japan. They believe that deflation is a greater risk than inflation. If it doesn’t work, by definition we find ourselves in a Japan-like scenario. We believe that if QE2 doesn’t work, we will see QE3, QE4, QE5 – the limit is not QE2. The point is, if it doesn’t work, look at a risk parity portfolio in a Japan scenario. We have done this analysis and from 1996 to today, compared to a 60/40 portfolio – risk parity performs extremely well. If QE2 does work, the fear is inflation. How do risk parity portfolios perform there? We also looked at 1970s as a case study, and what we found was that risk parity outperformed 60/40 in that environment – spiking interest rates and high inflation isn’t great for equities either.”

QE2 on other asset classes…

Few investors hold only fixed-income investments, of course. The price of other assets will be affected by such liquidity injections, of course, and we asked the same vendors what they thought QE2 would do to the price of other assets held by institutions.

Bob Prince of Bridgewater Associates: “A risk parity portfolio is a balanced portfolio, it is not bond heavy. In our opinion, the aggregate pricing of risk premiums across asset classes is now high. QE2 will distribute another wave of liquidity through financial markets that should contribute to declining risk premiums. On the other hand, the unusual nature of the economic environment, reflected in the need for quantitative easing, is an important reason that risk premiums are high and are likely to remain high over time.”

Bryan Belton of PanAgora: “A meaningful allocation to real assets (TIPS and commodities) is critical for promoting long term wealth creation in an inflationary environment.”



<none>

CalPERS to Commit $500 Million to Environmentally-Friendly Companies

The country’s largest public pension fund has said it will pour $500 million into 'green' companies, focusing on “top performers that have improved share value and also done good for the environment.”

(November 11, 2010) — The California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), aims to invest $500 million in a ‘green’ portfolio in an effort to limit greenhouse-gas emissions and improve the environment. The investment is in addition to about $2 billion CalPERS has committed to green-related investments in the past four years.

“This new index has kept pace with non-environmental investments in recent years, and has outperformed our external environmental managers who have focused solely on excluding polluting companies from their portfolios,” George Diehr, CalPERS investment committee chairman, said in a statement. CalPERS Board President Rob Feckner added that until now, the fund has invested in external managers whose funds screen out the “worst offending” public companies. But, he said the fund’s new green initiative — which relies on internal management — is a more robust and quantitative strategy.

The internal team responsible for managing the strategy will model it after HSBC’s Global Climate Change Benchmark Index (HSBC CCI), according to CalPERS. To be included in the portfolio, companies must derive a material portion of their revenues from low-carbon energy production, such as wind, solar, biofuels and other alternative energy; water, waste and pollution control; energy efficiency and management including building insulation, fuel cells and energy storage; and carbon trading and other capital deployment and financial products.

“Research shows that a positive inclusionary methodology for investing in common stock companies is more successful than a negative exclusionary approach that uses subjective rather than quantitative selection criteria,” Diehr said.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Since 2006, the $219 billion public fund has committed $500 million to external managers in its Global Equity asset class who restrict companies with a negative environmental footprint.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«