QE vs. Factor Investing | Chief Investment Officer

Investors relying on long-only factors are at the whim of central banks rather than company fundamentals, two managers have argued.

Anthony Lawler and Adam Glinsman, fund managers at Swiss group GAM, warned in a report that investing with the view that factors such as value and quality will push up equity prices in the near-term “introduces single-factor bet risk into a portfolio.”

“This factor—company and security-level fundamentals—could continue to underperform if prices remain disconnected from fundamental drivers,” the managers wrote. “Instead, market technicals and macro issues—namely the size of central bank balance sheets and the methods of quantitative easing [QE]—could continue to be the main factor in determining prices.”

The US Federal Reserve ended its massive QE program in 2014 after buying $4.5 trillion of assets. Each new wave of QE sparked stock market rallies, while the decision to end it caused yields on US treasury bonds to spike in 2013.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

During the US’ first round of QE, which ran from December 2008 to March 2010, MSCI’s World Quality index gained 45% according to data from FE Analytics. The firm’s momentum and minimum volatility indexes both rose by roughly 21%. The second round, from September 2012 to December 2013, saw the three indexes rise by between 17% and 27%.

In Europe, the European Central Bank earlier this year increased its QE program by a third to €80 billion ($88 billion) a month, including corporate bond purchases. The Bank of England reintroduced QE following the UK’s vote to leave the European Union in June, planning to add £60 billion ($73.4 billion) of government bonds to its balance sheet.

Fundamental valuation metrics such as price-to-earnings ratios “have taken a backseat to central bank policy in driving price determination,” Lawler and Glinsman wrote. “All liquid assets, including equities and bonds, have rallied with the rising tide of liquidity provided by the world’s central banks. There has not been much reward for seeking out fundamental value. Either you were in the boat—long equities and bonds—as the tide rose or you were not.”

The University of Texas Investment Management Company (UTIMCO) has appointed Mark Warner as interim CIO and chief executive following Bruce Zimmerman’s resignation earlier this week.

Warner, currently a senior managing director leading natural resources investments, will helm the $37 billion endowment until a permanent replacement is found.

“We have the utmost confidence in Mark Warner and his ability to provide leadership and make progress while we conduct a national search for UTIMCO’s next CEO/CIO,” said Jeffrey Hildebrand, UTIMCO board chair and vice chairman of the UT System Board of Regents.

The board also authorized on Thursday the creation of a search advisory committee and the hiring of an executive search firm to help select Zimmerman’s successor.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

“We have a tremendous opportunity to build on UTIMCO’s strong foundation, and I have no doubt that the opening will attract the best possible talent to both protect and grow our investments for the benefit of Texas public higher education,” Hildebrand continued.

Warner first joined UTIMCO in 2007 to manage its natural resources investments. Most recently he was responsible for several portfolios including emerging markets and private equity.

He holds an MBA from Southern Methodist University’s Cox School of Business.