Home > News > Asset Allocation > Public Equities Drag Orange County Pension Investments 7.8% Lower in 2022
Asset Allocation

Public Equities Drag Orange County Pension Investments 7.8% Lower in 2022

The portfolio’s market value dropped by more than $2 billion last year to $20.2 billion.

By Michael Katz




The Orange County Employees Retirement System’s investment portfolio lost 7.8% in 2022, as public equity losses helped drag the market value of its portfolio down to $20.2 billion from $22.5 billion at the end of 2021, according to its annual comprehensive financial report.

OCERS also reported that its annualized returns, net of fees, over the trailing three-, five- and 10-year periods were 6.2%, 6.1% and 6.9%, respectively, as of year-end 2022.

The pension fund’s global public equity portfolio fell 18.5% during the year, with U.S. equities tumbling 19.1% and non-U.S. equities dropping 14.7%, while emerging market equities were the worst-performing asset class, diving 25.1% in 2022. At the same time, the fixed-income markets failed to provide a safe port in the storm, losing 10.5% during the year.

OCERS blamed the public market losses on “persistently high inflation” and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It also said that as inflation remained well above expectations throughout the year and central banks ratcheted up interest rates, it “brought an end to more than a decade of easy money Federal Reserve policy.”

Real assets were the top-performing asset class for the pension fund, returning 18.7% during the year and easily beating its benchmark’s return of 10.98%. Within the asset class, private real assets returned 24.5%, as energy and infrastructure assets benefitted from high inflation, and the real estate portfolio gained 14.2%, thanks to a strong performance from the industrial and multifamily sectors.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Risk mitigation assets returned a shade more than 7%, which trounced the benchmark’s 0.24% loss for the year. Meanwhile, the pension fund’s private equity investments returned 0.54%, underperforming their benchmark, which returned 2.52% last year.

The pension fund noted that because it is customary to report private market performance on a quarterly lag, its year-end performance for many private equity, private credit and private real assets managers will reflect returns as of the end of 2022’s third quarter.

OCERS’ asset allocation as of the end of 2022 was 44% public equity, 16% private equity, 14% real assets, 9% risk mitigation, 8% core fixed income, 7% credit and 2% cash and cash equivalents.


Related Stories:

Orange County Pension CIO Resigns

Why Is OCERS Looking at Dumping Ray Dalio’s Prized Hedge Fund?

OCERS: An Institutional Laboratory

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Home > News > Asset Allocation > How SWIB’s New Actively Managed Portfolio Aims to Be ‘Different’
Asset Allocation

How SWIB’s New Actively Managed Portfolio Aims to Be ‘Different’

Wisconsin’s Select Equity fund, launched just four months ago, aims to use such techniques as long-short pairings.

By Larry Light



Passive investing has long been the preferred choice among asset allocators, especially pension funds. After all, active investing has historically been a laggard, and it costs more than just following an index. This year through July, a mere 36% of active funds and exchange-traded funds beat their index benchmarks, according to a research report by Bank of America Global Securities.

But, assuming institutions’ results resemble retail ones, what about the one-third of active strategies that can best the indexes? Finding that is a quest of the State of Wisconsin Investment Board (assets under management: $143 billion). SWIB oversees the assets of the state’s retirement system, which is 106% funded, and under CIO Edwin Denson, it has striven to add alpha through active investing.

Toward that end, SWIB on April 1 launched a special actively managed portfolio called Select Equity. This concentrated portfolio aims eventually to own 50 to 70 stocks and be valued overall at up to $20 billion. So far, it has bought around 35 stocks. Like other active equity investments at SWIB, this fund will be internally managed and focus on fundamental analysis—and it also has an intriguing long-short structure.

“We have a lot of information in the organization,” including quantitative capabilities, says Susan Schmidt, who joined SWIB a year ago and oversees public equities. “We have phenomenal scale.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

For Schmidt, who previously ran U.S. equities at Aviva Investors, a London-based asset manager, active investing “allows us to be nimble and do better than the index.”

While not revealing what specific stocks the fund invests in, Schmidt says SWIB is ahead of its benchmark—the MSCI World Index, up 14.7% year to date—thus far in its short life: “We want modest turnover and are not playing” with quarterly results in mind.

To hear Schmidt tell it, the new portfolio sounds as if it adopts a value approach when she says, “We want to find something the market is missing” and stocks “with a catalyst in their future.” But she adds that she does not “adhere to a style box” and can buy growth, value or core stocks, albeit names that are not wildly expensive.

She casts her portfolio members as “growth at a reasonable price.” Select Equity will not buy momentum stocks. Ditto for deep value shares, which Schmidt fears “could go out of business,” leaving the fund with a loss.

The long-short tactic is a means to protect the fund’s gains and, Schmidt says, is structured to “enhance capital efficiency.” A particular stock will be offset by a short position against a basket of stocks (which Select Equity creates) in the same sector as the long position. The short basket is equal weighted and avoids potential merger targets—which usually spike in price after an acquisition proposal surfaces—and stocks with low liquidity.

SWIB’s new actively managed vehicle is “different,” Schmidt says.

Being different always is risky. But it also carries the alluring potential of being very successful.


Related Stories:

Why Bother With Active Management When Mechanistic Passive Does Best Historically?

New Champs: Index Funds Edge Past Actives in Stock Market Share

Why the Time May Be Ripe for a Return to Active Management

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«