Proposed UK Pension Reform Could Cut Benefits for Millions

Government proposal suggests lowering the rate at which it increases payments to compensate for inflation.

The UK government has issued a pension reform Green Paper that includes proposals that could significantly reduce retirement benefits to millions of Britons.

The Green Paper contains proposals calling for companies to lower their pension indexation, which is the annual rate at which they increase payments to compensate for inflation. It is suggested that this could be done by allowing plans to reduce indexation to the statutory minimum, or to allow plans that base their indexation on the Retail Price Index (RPI) to switch to the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

“There may be a case for rationalizing indexation so that there is a level playing field across the sector,” said the UK’s Department for Work and Pensions, which issued the Green Paper.

Although the UK Government switched its indexation from RPI to CPI for pension purposes in 2010, some 75% of private pension plans in the UK still base their indexation on RPI.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Because the CPI has been lower than RPI in nine of out the last 10 years, and 22 years out of the last 27, up to 2015, allowing pension to move from RPI to CPI would likely have a considerable impact on retirees’ benefits.  According to pension consultants Hymans Robertson, switching from RPI to CPI would take away £20,000 in benefits over an average pension participant’s life. The group also said that moving to statutory indexation was an even more extreme measure that would “ride roughshod over schemes trust deed and rules.”

The statutory minimum applies to defined benefit pensions (also known as final salary pensions) accrued after April 1997, and before 2005, and which must be increased each year by inflation capped at 5%. Pensions accrued after 2005 must be increased by inflation capped at 2.5% each year.

Despite calling for pension reform proposals, the British government maintains a relatively positive outlook on the future of British pension funds. While “recognizing that the system may not be operating optimally in all areas, our main conclusion is that there is not a significant structural problem with the regulatory and legislative framework” of defined benefit pension plans,” said the Green Paper’s executive summary.  

The Green Paper will review the powers of The Pensions Regulator, and encourage a debate making a fair compromise between the needs employers, members, the Pension Protection Fund, according to the Department for Work and Pensions.

“People need to have confidence in their pension and it is vital that they feel that they are secure,” Richard Harrington, the UK’s Minister for Pensions, said in a release. “With recent high-profile cases highlighting the risks inherent in defined benefit pensions, we want to ensure that these important pension schemes remain sustainable for the future and that the right protections are in place for members.”

After the 2008 financial crisis, record-low interest rates and reduced expectations for future investment returns have increased estimates of deficits in UK. pension funds, and pension liabilities have grown more than their assets have. 

“This has led to a number of commentators to declare that there is a fundamental problem with DB schemes,” said the Green Paper. “The Government understands people’s concerns; however, it does not recognize this view of the pensions system,” and “we also expect the vast majority of members to receive their benefits in full.”

Despite the government’s relatively positive view of the state of the pension fund system, it does acknowledge that there is room for improvement. “This Green Paper seeks to identify where there may be particular problems or issues in order to start an informed discussion on the best way to improve the management and oversight of the risks inherent in providing [defined benefit] pensions.”

In the UK, the average defined benefit pension in payment is a little under £7,000 per year, which is equal to approximately 25% of the median gross earnings of full-time employees in the country, according to the Office for National Statistics. There are approximately 11 million people relying on defined benefit plans, which hold around £1.5 trillion of assets.

The number of Britons participating in private sector defined benefit schemes has been in steady decline, as active memberships have fallen by more than 50% over the past 10 years, according to the UK’s Pension Protection Fund. And the proportion of defined benefit plans open to new members has dropped to 13% in 2016, from 35% in 2006.

By Michael Katz

As Investors Search for More Alternatives to Boost Returns, Private Equity Tops the List

Institutional investors complain about not finding the right opportunities, terms and possible partners, particularly when investing in private equity, real estate, infrastructure and hedge fund deals.

Institutional investors are ramping up their appetite for alternatives, including exotics such as unlisted infrastructure and private debt, but continue to be dissatisfied with hedge funds, according to Preqin’s H1 2017 Investor Outlook.

The study also found that institutional investors are looking to invest in a wider range of alternative asset classes. One-third of investors now commit to four or more asset classes, up from one-quarter a year ago, while almost one in 10 invest across all alternatives, the study found.

More specifically, Preqin said 9% of institutions invest in all six alternative asset classes, one-fifth have exposure to five or more, and over one-third (34%) invest in four or more. This represents a notable increase over the past 12 months: a year ago, only a quarter of respondents invested in at least four asset classes, and just 13% had exposure to five or more separate markets. The six alternative asset classes are hedge funds, private equity, real estate, infrastructure private debt and natural resources.

Driven by the need to diversify and generate higher returns, there is now more than $7.7 trillion in hedge funds and private capital managed globally. This is an increase of $300 billion during 2016. “Participation in multiple alternative asset classes is now the norm for the majority of institutional investors, with alternatives portfolios becoming more and more diverse,” Preqin said. But this growth in alternatives is not equal among all the choices.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

First, institutional investors have too many choices. Preqin said there are almost 18,000 alternatives funds open for investment, “but for investors, finding the true outperformers is a difficult prospect, particularly when the majority is finding that the marketing documents they receive are not meeting their needs.”

On a sector basis, the most popular alternative allocations (based on survey respondents) are real estate (61%), private equity (57%), hedge funds (51%), natural resource (40%), private debt (37%), and infrastructure (36%). Of these, the sectors which have been designated as reducing allocation in the next year are hedge funds (31%) and natural resources (23%), followed by small reduced allocations in the range of 6% to 11% for the other alternatives.

When it comes to both institutional investors and their alternative asset managers having their goals aligned, private equity ranks at the top, while hedge funds again get the lowest survey ratings because investors “decided not to invest in a fund due to the proposed terms and conditions.”

When it comes to making an actual investment, institutional investors complain about not finding the right opportunities, terms and possible partners. This is most critical when investing in private equity, real estate, infrastructure and hedge fund deals, the survey said. This happens despite the proliferation of offering documents investors receive monthly. The report found that investors receive 20 documents a month from hedge funds, and 17 from private equity and real estate managers.  The quality of these documents was also rated and found that materials from infrastructure and real estate deals most often “met the needs” of investors. Natural resources and real estate documents were rated on the opposite side of the needs spectrum. .

Private Equity: The Darling of Alternatives in 2017

Of all the alternatives, private equity has moved to the top of the list in terms of institutional interest. “As we move into the first half of 2017, institutional investor sentiment towards private equity is more positive than ever,” the study said. In this category, 84% of institutional investors had a positive view of private equity, up from 59% two years ago. On the downside, 70% of respondents said fund managers “may be overpaying for assets which could be difficult to realize if prices fall at a later date.” Investors also were concerned about the exit environment (51% of respondents, up from 24% this time last year) and deal flow (41%, up from 34%).

The future also looks good for this sector, with 89% of investors looking to invest the same amount or more capital in private equity in 2018, while 76% plan to make their next commitment in 1Q 2017 and 7% intend to do so in 2Q 2017. An additional 11% plan to invest in the second half of 2017, and only 6% expect to wait until 2018 or later for their next commitment. 

On a geographic basis, investors think the best opportunities for private equity worldwide are in North America (61%), Europe (44%), Asia (21%) and emerging markets (19%).

By Chuck Epstein

«

You have reached your limit of two free articles