Private School Endowments Return 7.4% in 2018

Size matters, as the larger funds outperformed the smaller ones.

Private school endowments in the US returned 7.4% on assets for fiscal year 2018, down from 11.8% the previous year, according to a study from Commonfund, an asset manager for non-profit organizations. 

The annual study of independent school endowment management practices was conducted by Commonfund in conjunction with the National Business Officers Association. A total of 223 schools representing approximately $12 billion in combined endowment assets provided data for the study.

The participating institutions are comprised of day schools, boarding schools, and schools that are a combination of the two. The schools are private, nonprofit institutions enrolling students from kindergarten through 12th grade. Approximately 10% of the student population in the US attends an independent school, according to the National Association of Independent Schools.

This year’s study found that trailing 10-year returns rose to an average of 5.5% net of fees from 5.2% the previous year. Meanwhile trailing five-year returns declined to an average of 7.3% from 7.9%, and average three-year returns rose to 6.2% from 4.4% a year ago.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“Just like we see with colleges and universities, independent schools are facing rising costs and limits on their ability to raise tuition,” said Cathleen Rittereiser, executive director of the Commonfund Institute. “Raising non-tuition sources of revenue is an imperative, maximizing the returns of their endowments is an important part of that strategy.”

Data gathered in the study was segmented into three size groups: institutions with endowment assets of more than $50 million; those with assets between $10 million and $50 million; and those with less than $10 million in assets.

The results from the study indicate that size matters for these endowments as the larger ones on average outperformed the smaller ones. Schools with assets over $50 million reported an average return of 8.2% in 2018, while those with assets between $10 million and $50 million reported a return of 7.4%, and those with less than $10 million in assets reported a 6.2% return.

Schools with assets over $50 million also reported the highest return for the three, five-, and 10-year time periods. Over the past 10 years, the largest schools reported an average return of 6.3%, while institutions with assets between $10 million and $50 million reported an average return of 5.5%, and those with assets under $10 million saw a 4.4% average return.

The asset allocations for private school endowments stayed relatively unchanged during fiscal year 2018, according to the study. Participating institutions reported having an average of 33% of their endowments invested in alternative strategies, down from 35% in 2017; 28% in US equities, down from 27% in 2017; 22% in non-US equities, up from 20% in 2017; 13% in fixed income, which is unchanged from the previous year; and 4% in short-term securities, cash, or “other,” down from 5% in 2017.

Within the 33% allocated to alternative strategies, marketable alternative strategies accounted for the largest sub-allocation, at 18%, followed by private equity, which accounted for 6%. Energy and natural resources accounted for a 3% allocation, and venture capital and private equity real estate (noncampus) were at 2% each, while commodities and managed futures and distressed debt accounted for 1% each.

Related Stories:

US Educational Endowments Return 8.2% in 2018

Endowment Index Falls 9% in 2018

The Secret of Smaller Endowments and Foundations’ Outperformance

Tags: , , ,

Despite Strong Returns, New Mexico Exits Core Real Estate Strategy

Pension cites Berkshire’s lack of ability to ‘scale up going forward.’

The New Mexico State Investment Council (SIC) withdrew from one of its eight core real estate funds, redeeming its exposure to Berkshire’s open-ended real estate fund during its recent board meeting, citing unwariness on the account’s future potential.

The Berkshire Multifamily Income Realty Fund (BMF) launched in 2015 as a core-plus real estate fund focused on acquiring recently built multifamily assets within prime submarkets across the United States located nearby office and retail investments.

The SIC had concerns “about the fund’s ability to continue scale up going forward,” a spokesperson for the organization told CIO. “We like the manager and the returns for the fund were positive, but we decided to go in a different direction.”

The evergreen fund raised $525 million by the end of September 2018, according to an SEC filing. The GP lowered the minimum commitment size to the fund from $5 million to $1 million between 2017 and 2018.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The investment committee approved the withdrawal of the council’s $75 million commitment to the fund, which was approved in September 2015. As of September 30, 2018, the SIC’s net asset value (NAV) in the BMF was $98.9 million and represented 4.8% of New Mexico fund’s total real estate portfolio, according to a report. The fund had distributed $6.99 million to the SIC since its commitment.

The fund had a since-inception internal rate of return (IRR) of 10.3% and x1.3 equity, the spokesperson added.

The remainder of the SIC’s core real estate portfolio remains well diversified manager-wise, with seven other strategies managed by Heitman, Invesco, Jamestown, Lion, PRISA, UBS, and USAA.

During the meeting, the SIC also made substantial commitments to other private equity and infrastructure strategies. The council voted to approve a $100 million commitment to Brookfield Infrastructure IV (BIF IV), and an equal amount to TA XIII, a global growth equity fund focused on the middle market.

The allocation to Brookfield Infrastructure IV is the third commitment from the SIC to the asset manager’s relatively successful core infrastructure fund series. It previously committed $100 million to BIF II and $75 million to BIF III. The SIC has a $200 million to $250 million annual pacing plan for its real assets portfolio, the spokesperson added, “but is opportunity-driven and could be changing [in the near future].”

Related Stories:

How Vince Smith at New Mexico State Investment Council is Using Real Estate to Weather Late Cycle and Rising Rates

New Mexico State Investment Council Reveals FY 2018 Investment Plan


Tags: , , ,

«