Preqin: IPO Activity on the Uptick With PE, VC

(November 7, 2012) — There are currently 42 private equity- and venture capital-backed companies globally set to list in the coming weeks, seeking to raise $8.4 billion in public offerings, Preqin’s initial public offering (IPO) pipeline data reveals.

Twenty-four of the 42 companies are buyout-backed, and a further 18 VC-backed companies have currently filed for an IPO.

According to Preqin’s findings, there are currently 31 North America-based PE- and VC-backed companies in the IPO pipeline, seeking to raise $6.1 billion in listings.

“We are only in the opening weeks of Q4 2012, yet the $4 billion raised from 19 PE- and VC-backed public offerings has already provided an indication that this quarter looks set to eclipse the lows witnessed in Q3 2012, which saw the lowest levels of PE- and VC-backed IPO activity since 2009,” according to Manuel Carvalho, Preqin’s manager of private equity deals.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

Furthermore, according to Preqin, between January and October, North America-based PE- and VC-backed IPOs accounted for 61% of the number and 64% of the value of public offerings globally. “This is a marked increased in the prominence of North American IPOs, which since 2009 have typically accounted for less than half of global PE- backed IPO activity,” Preqin stated in a release.

Carvalho concluded by noting that improved market conditions have led to a wave of IPOs in October of this year. He asserted that while nothing is guaranteed in the IPO pipeline, if public market conditions (particularly in the US) remain solid in the coming weeks, then Q4 2012 could likely witness continued exit activity via the public markets for PE- and VC-backed companies.

(November 7, 2012) — Pension funds are not keeping a watchful eye on their liability-driven investment (LDI) managers and could suffer as a result, a consulting firm has warned.

“Many pension funds see their LDI managers put swaps or gilts in place to hedge out risk and then walk away,” said Pete Drewienkiewicz, head of manager research at UK-based investment consultant Redington. “CIOs and trustees cannot just ‘set and forget’.”

Drewienkiewicz said putting triggers into place for an LDI strategy did not mean investors could walk away from the portfolio thinking the job was done.

“Trigger rates are useful, but they should not mean all responsibility is delegated. Many pension funds do not consider what would happen if these triggers are not hit and derisking does not happen in the time frame they thought.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

CIOs and trustees should be more demanding of their LDI managers, Drewienkiewicz said, and encourage them to take a more opportunistic approach to managing their portfolio.

“There are assets, such as long-term leases and social housing, which need less collateral than swaps, for example, and several buyout managers are already using them, making them a good match should a pension fund be moving in that direction. Some of these are also desirable for pension funds under a Solvency II framework, should that be implemented in its proposed form,” Drewienkiewicz said.

Redington also urges its clients to demand better reporting from their LDI manager when setting up their initial contract, Drewienkiewicz said, to ensure the strategy was appropriate for the fund’s overall framework.

“Investors have to understand what risks an LDI manager is taking. Just because they are running a passive mandate, it does not mean it is low risk,” said Drewienkiewicz. “Pension funds have to be sure of their risk limits – not to prevent their manager taking risk necessarily, but to understand what is going on throughout their entire portfolio.”

For an in-depth examination of LDI and its evolution, see aiCIO‘s dedicated edition released later this month.