Police Pension Fund Sues Goldman Sachs for 1MDB Records

Sergeants Benevolent Association calls Malaysian scandal ‘worst-ever fleecing of a sovereign wealth fund.’

A New York City police pension fund is suing Goldman Sachs to obtain corporate records to determine whether the firm violated its duties in connection with a Malaysian fraud and money-laundering scandal. The case has entangled Malaysian government-owned investment fund 1Malaysia Development Bhd, better known as 1MDB.

The complaint was filed with The Delaware Court of Chancery on behalf of The Sergeants Benevolent Association Annuity Fund. It seeks to determine whether the firm violated fiduciary duties, duties of loyalty, or other duties in connection with the fraud and money-laundering plan.

An estimated $4.5 billion was allegedly misappropriated and fraudulently diverted from 1MDB, and the pension fund said that “the scandal has the potential to result in significant fines and penalties” for Goldman Sachs.

Goldman Sachs and its senior officials arranged a series of bond offerings for 1MDB in 2012 and 2013 that raised a total of $6.5 billion and earned the company “unusually outsized fees” of nearly $600 million, the suit contends.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“As it would be later revealed, however, the company’s involvement in these bond offerings were at the center of a wide-ranging fraud and money-laundering scheme that may amount to one of the largest heists in history,” said the complaint, “and certainly the worst-ever fleecing of a sovereign wealth fund.”

The complaint also said that at least $2.7 billion was misappropriated for purposes of paying bribes and kickbacks to foreign officials, “ensuring Goldman Sachs continued to benefit from its business with 1MDB, and personally enriching the individuals involved.”

As a Goldman Sachs stockholder, the pension fund said it is seeking to enforce its rights to inspect certain corporate books and records of Goldman Sachs. In May it sent a request to Goldman Sachs’s general counsel for documents related to 1MDB. Despite receiving 117 documents from the firm, the fund said those documents “fall far short” of what they were looking for. The fund is asking the court to enter a summary order directing Goldman Sachs to produce the requested books and records for inspection.

The complaint said that in early 2009 two Goldman Sachs managing directors, Tim Leissner and Roger Ng, persuaded officials in the oil-rich Malaysian state of Terengganu to establish a sovereign wealth fund known as the Terengganu Investment Authority (TIA). Later that year, the two worked closely with Malaysian businessperson Low Taek Jho to help TIA raise approximately $1.4 billion.

Months later, newly elected Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, took over TIA and renamed it 1Malaysia Development Bhd. As a sovereign wealth fund, 1MDB said it sought to finance infrastructure and economic development around the country.

“From 1MDB’s inception, Leissner and Ng, using Low’s close personal relationships with Najib and other Malaysian government officials, played a central role in the Goldman Sach’s relationship with 1MDB,” said the complaint.

The complaint said that about the same time, Goldman Sachs rejected Low’s application  for a private wealth management account with the company’s private bank because it could not validate the source of his wealth.

“Despite the questions about Low’s financial history, Goldman Sachs continued to use Low as an intermediary between it and Malaysian officials,” said the complaint.  

Then-Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein personally met with Low and Prime Minister Najib in November of 2009, purportedly to discuss a potential relationship between Goldman Sachs and 1MDB. Blankfein met with Low at least two more times, in 2012 and 2013. As a result, 1MDB engaged Goldman Sachs as underwriter and arranger in three separate bond offerings, which raised a total of $6.5 billion.

But beginning in 2015, news outlets began reporting on the extent of the misconduct surrounding the 1MDB funds, and the sovereign wealth fund became the subject of international criminal and regulatory investigations for fraud and money laundering. In July of that year, The Wall Street Journal reported that Malaysian investigators had tracked nearly $700 million in deposits to Najib’s personal bank accounts.

The complaint says Goldman Sachs’s former president Gary Cohn knew of and personally supported the 1MDB deals, despite the objections of officials like David Ryan, who was then president of Goldman Sachs Asia-Pacific Ex-Japan. It said Ryan conveyed his concerns after visiting with 1MDB officials, but that he was effectively sidelined from the deals and left the company within a year.

“The backing of a domineering and powerful personality like Cohn afforded significant cover to those involved in the 1MDB business,” said the complaint, “and drowned out the voices of those who were uncomfortable with the plans to raise billions of dollars for the fund.”

Related Stories:

Mubadala Suspends Future Goldman Ventures Due to 1MDB Scandal

US Recovers More Than $700 Million Stolen from Malaysian Sovereign Wealth Fund

US to Return $196 Million Stolen from Malaysian State Fund

Tags: , , , ,

Miami Pension Files Lawsuit Against Carl Icahn over Insider Trading Allegations

The Miami Firefighter Relief and Pension Fund alleges Icahn purchased shares of HP, knowing that Xerox would offer to purchase them later at a premium.


The Miami Firefighter Relief and Pension Fund (MFRPF) has filed a lawsuit against Carl Icahn and his affiliated investment vehicles, alleging they breached their fiduciary duty of loyalty by purchasing $1.2 billion of HP Inc. common stock with knowledge that Xerox was intending to buy the stock at a premium price soon afterwards, subsequently generating a substantial profit for Icahn.

The pension said that Icahn “effectively controls Xerox based upon being its largest single shareholder,” and has been active in his responsibilities, including replacing at least five out of the seven board members, selling subsidiary organizations, replacing the company CEO, and threatening proxy contests.

“Icahn is party to a confidentiality agreement with Xerox pursuant to which he and his affiliates receive non-public information regarding the company,” the pension said.

On April 25, 2019, Xerox CEO John Visentin said during a call with analysts that “we’re never going to comment on the potential targets. But we’re building a deep M&A pipeline that will support our revenue road map.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The nonconfidential portions of Icahn’s June 30, 2019, disclosure with the SEC shared that Icahn held no HP common stock at the time. Icahn is the founder of Icahn Enterprises, chairman of Federal-Mogul, a developer of powertrain components, and former advisor to President Donald Trump.

Xerox sent a letter to HP’s board of directors on November 5, 2019, offering to buy the company for $33.5 billion. HP’s stock jumped from $18.40 to $21.64 per share when news of the offer went public.

The Miami Firefighter’s pension asserts that Icahn breached his contract of confidentiality with Xerox, and deprived the company of the benefit of its bargain by buying such a large amount of shares before the acquisition. “[Icahn was] enriched at Xerox’s expense,” the lawsuit says. “It is against equity and good conscience to permit [Icahn] to retain any profits made, or dividends received, from investing in HP common stock.”

“Permitting [Icahn] to retain the HP common stock [he] acquired and any dividends received appurtenant thereto is unjust, in light of circumstances, under equitable principles of New York law.”

Icahn and affiliated defendants’ ownership of HP common stock rose in market value by approximately $128 million after news of the potential acquisition went public. They were entitled to dividends of approximately $11 million on or about January 2, 2020, bringing their total profits from acquiring HP stock to roughly $140 million.

“The wrongful acts [executed by Icahn] have caused harm to Xerox and will continue to subject Xerox to harm because the adverse consequences of the injurious actions are still in effect and ongoing,” the pension said.

Speculation of insider trading was in part originated when Gordon Haskett analyst Don Bilson said that an activist investor could be targeting HP common stock because of a huge spike in recent trading volume came about despite the lack of an obvious catalyst.

Related Stories:

Lawsuit Accuses CBS Execs of Insider Trading

Washington State Investment Board Advances Lawsuit Against Brazilian Company


Add Carl Icahn to the List Opposing MMT

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

«

Thank you so much for your interest in our content. Please register to access this complimentary archived content. By registering, you will receive our newsletter which can be opted out of at any time.

 

 

Already Registered? Click here to confirm.